阅读说明：本技术 水力轴流式涡轮机或泵的转轮 (Runner for hydraulic axial flow turbine or pump ) 是由 斯图尔特·库尔森 塞思·史密斯 沃尔特·里格勒尔 托马斯·奥特 于 2018-04-17 设计创作，主要内容包括：一种用于水力涡轮机或泵的螺旋桨型转轮,包括轮毂(1)和多个叶片(2、3),其中,最多且包括两个的叶片(3)使用螺栓固定到轮毂(1),并且其余叶片(2)焊接到轮毂,并且其中,每个螺栓连接的叶片(3)由两个焊接的叶片(2)邻接。(A propeller-type runner for a water turbine or pump, comprising a hub (1) and a plurality of blades (2, 3), wherein the maximum and including two blades (3) are fixed to the hub (1) using bolts and the remaining blades (2) are welded to the hub, and wherein each bolted blade (3) is adjoined by two welded blades (2).)

1. A propeller-type runner for a water turbine or pump, the runner comprising a hub (1) and a plurality of blades (2, 3), wherein a maximum of and including two blades (3) are fixed to the hub (1) using bolts and the remaining blades (2) are welded to the hub, and wherein each bolted blade (3) is adjoined by two welded blades (2).

2. Runner according to claim 1, wherein the total number of blades (2, 3) is three and exactly one blade (3) is fixed to the hub (1) using bolts.

3. Runner according to claim 1, wherein the total number of blades (2, 3) is four and exactly one blade (3) is fixed to the hub (1) using bolts.

4. Runner according to claim 1, wherein the total number of blades (2, 3) is four and exactly two blades (3) are fixed to the hub (1) using bolts.

5. Runner according to claim 1, wherein the total number of blades (2, 3) exceeds four and exactly two blades (3) are fixed to the hub (1) using bolts and the bolted blades (3) are located on opposite sides of the hub (1).

Technical Field

The present invention relates to a hydraulic axial flow turbine or pump device having a propeller-type rotating element or wheel.

Background

The runner of an axial flow water pump or turbine includes a hub and a plurality of runner blades secured to the hub. In the prior art, basically four different designs of such wheels are known. The runner may be made by: integrally casting the hub and the runner blade; welding individually cast runner blades to a hub; bolting individually cast runner blades to a hub; or each runner blade is cast integrally with a segment of the hub and the segments are arranged in an annular array which is held together by a shrink ring. Examples of known wheels are shown in U.S. patent application publications 2009/0092496 and 2015/0017004.

These designs provide the advantage that one or more of the blades may be attached to the hub at a dam or other turbine mounting location (at the site) with the individual blades bolted or welded to the hub. Transporting the hub alone or with less than all of its runner blades attached thereto reduces transportation costs and difficulties. The same applies to designs comprising blades cast integrally with a section of the hub. However, these designs involve other disadvantages. Welding of the runner blades to the hub at the site is a difficult task, which is often beyond the skill of the field personnel. The runner with bolted blades is expensive because the installation is complicated and requires additional milling. This also applies to designs that include blades cast integrally with sections of the hub. Another disadvantage of wheels with bolted blades is that the design involves a larger size hub because the trunnions require a large amount of space. However, runner designs with bolted blades and small size hubs are known, but these designs are even more expensive (e.g. US 2015/0017004).

Disclosure of Invention

It is an object of the present invention to provide a rotor for a propeller-type axial flow water pump or turbine which can be transported without difficulty and high cost, can be assembled on site without special skills of field personnel, and is less costly than a rotor with bolted blades.

this object is achieved by a wheel according to claim 1. Further advantageous embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the dependent claims.

The inventors have realised that in order to avoid difficulties during transportation of a propeller type rotor, it is sufficient to detach only one or two blades of the rotor from the hub. The other blades may remain fixed to the hub, so these blades need not be bolted. With respect to cost, it is advantageous to weld the stationary blades to the hub. Welding is performed in the factory, rather than at the field.

Drawings

The invention will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings:

Figure 1 is a cross-sectional axial view of a propeller type rotor according to the present invention.

Detailed Description

Figure 1 shows schematically a cross-sectional axial view of a propeller type rotor. The hub of the wheel is indicated with 1. The runner comprises four blades, and two of the blades are fixed to the hub by welding. One of which is indicated with 2. The other two blades are constructed (constrained) to be detachable, which means that the blades are bolted. One of the bolted blades is indicated with 3. In fig. 1, the bolted blades are shown in a disassembled position, as is the case with the transport rotor. It is clear that by removing the bolted blades, the size of the runner in the vertical direction of fig. 1 is greatly reduced. In many cases it is sufficient to configure even just one of the blades to be detachable to avoid difficulties arising during transportation of the runner.

In fig. 1, it can also be seen that the mounting flanges (trunnions) of the bolted blades 3 are relatively large. The hub 1 is not large enough in size so that all blades cannot be made detachable with such large trunnions. Since only two blades 3 are constructed to be detachable and two blades 2 adjoining each bolted blade 3 are welded to the hub 1, a space is left on the hub 1 and a large trunnion can be accommodated by the relatively small hub 1. The welded blade does not require trunnions. The large trunnion improves the structural stability of the hub with bolted blades. Furthermore, the large trunnion does not require a complicated design and can be produced at low cost.

Fig. 1 is meant to be an example of the present invention. Of course, the invention is also applicable to rotors having different numbers of blades. In any case, each of the at most (and including) two bolted blades 3 must be adjoined by two blades 2, which are fixed to the hub 1 by welding. It is clear that one of the two adjoining welded blades 2 must be located on one side of the bolted blade 3 and the other adjoining welded blade 2 must be located on the other side of the bolted blade 3. This means that a bolted blade 3 does not abut another bolted blade 3.

If two bolted blades 3 are incorporated in the rotor according to the invention, it is advantageous that the two bolted blades 3 are located on opposite sides of the hub 1 in order to minimize the size of the rotor during transport to the site and to facilitate balancing of the rotor.