阅读说明：本技术 口腔护理工具以及用于制造此类口腔护理工具的方法 (Oral care implement and method for manufacturing such oral care implement ) 是由 A.乔尔 B.黑尔 A.森特克安德森 S.温斯可 M.许布纳 于 2018-04-10 设计创作，主要内容包括：本发明提供了一种包括头部和柄部的口腔护理工具,头部具有长度延伸部并且柄部具有长度延伸部,头部和柄部的长度延伸部一起限定口腔护理工具的沿纵向轴线的总长度延伸部。口腔护理工具的总长度延伸部为约194mm至约197mm,并且柄部的长度延伸部与口腔护理工具的总长度延伸部的比率为约0.59至约0.65。(the present invention provides an oral care implement comprising a head and a handle, the head having a length extension and the handle having a length extension, the length extensions of the head and the handle together defining an overall length extension of the oral care implement along a longitudinal axis. The overall length extension of the oral care implement is from about 194mm to about 197mm, and a ratio of the length extension of the handle to the overall length extension of the oral care implement is from about 0.59 to about 0.65.)

1. an oral care implement (10) comprising a head (12) and a handle (14), the head (12) having a length extension (18) and the handle (14) having a length extension (20), the length extensions (18,20) of the head (12) and the handle (14) together defining an overall length extension (16) of the oral care implement (10) along a longitudinal axis (22), the overall length extension (16) of the oral care implement (10) being from about 194mm to about 197mm, wherein

A ratio of the length extension (20) of the handle (14) to the overall length extension (16) of the oral care implement (10) is about 0.59 to about 0.65.

2. The oral care implement (10) according to claim 1, wherein a ratio of the length extension (20) of the handle (14) to the overall length extension (16) of the oral care implement (10) is from about 0.60 to about 0.64, preferably from about 0.61 to about 0.63, further preferably about 0.62.

3. the oral care implement (10) according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the overall length extension (16) of the oral care implement (10) is from about 195mm to about 196mm, preferably about 195 mm.

4. the oral care implement (10) according to any of the preceding claims wherein the length extension (20) of the handle (14) is from about 119mm to about 123mm, preferably about 121 mm.

5. The oral care implement (10) according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the length extension (18) of the head (12) is about 72mm to about 76mm, preferably about 74 mm.

6. The oral care implement (10) according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the handle (14) comprises a thumb rest (32) having an area (40) of about 202mm2 to about 360mm2, preferably the thumb rest (32) is made of a thermoplastic elastomeric material.

7. The oral care implement (10) according to claim 6, wherein the area (40) of the thumb rest (32) is about 250mm2 to about 353mm2, preferably about 270mm2 to about 350mm2, even further preferably about 290mm2 or about 340mm 2.

8. The oral care implement (10) according to claim 6 or 7, wherein the area (40) of the thumb rest (32) has a concave shape.

9. The oral care implement (10) according to any one of claims 6 to 8, wherein a portion of the thumb rest (32) is inclined relative to the remainder of the thumb rest (32) by an angle a of about 20 ° to about 25 °, preferably about 24 °.

10. The oral care implement (10) according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the overall length extension (16) of the oral care implement (10) is about 195mm, a ratio of the length extension (20) of the handle (14) to the overall length extension (16) of the oral care implement (10) is about 0.62, and the area (40) of the thumb rest (32) is about 290mm2 or about 340mm 2.

11. the oral care implement (10) according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the handle (14) is formed of at least two, preferably three, different materials (24,28, 30).

12. The oral care implement (10) according to claim 11, wherein one material is a polypropylene material (24,28) and one material is a thermoplastic elastomer material (30).

13. The oral care implement (10) according to claim 11 or 12, wherein the thermoplastic elastomer (30) has a shore a hardness of from about 30 to about 60, preferably about 40.

14. a method for manufacturing an oral care implement (10) according to any of the preceding claims, the method comprising the steps of:

-a first part (24) of injection moulded polypropylene material forming an underlying base structure (26) of the oral care implement (10),

-injection moulding a second part (28) of polypropylene material over the first part (24),

-injection moulding a third part (30) of thermoplastic elastomer material over the first part (24) and the second part (28).

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the third component (30) forms a thumb rest (32) on a front surface (34) of the oral care implement (10), and a palm grip (36) on the rear surface (38) of the oral care implement (10) opposite the front surface (34).

Technical Field

The present invention relates to an oral care implement comprising a head and a handle, the head having a length extension and the handle having a length extension, the length extensions of the head and the handle together defining an overall length extension of the oral care implement along a longitudinal axis.

Background

The head and handle of oral care implements, such as manual and electric toothbrushes, are well known in the art. Generally, bristle tufts for cleaning teeth are attached to a bristle carrier or mounting surface of a brush head intended for insertion into a user's mouth. A handle is typically attached to the head, which is held by the user during brushing. The head is permanently connected to or repeatedly attachable to and detachable from the handle.

In order to effectively clean the teeth, it is necessary to provide adequate contact pressure between the free ends of the bristle tufts and the teeth. Generally, the contact pressure depends not only on the bending stiffness and displacement of the bristles, but also on the handle and head characteristics of the toothbrush, in particular the shape, size and bending stiffness of the handle and the brush head. Typically, the handle of the toothbrush has the shape of a linear rod to be held and manipulated by the user as desired. However, it has been seen in the past that such handles are neither comfortable to hold nor easy to manipulate in the oral care cavity of a user.

generally, shanks having greater lengths exhibit lower bending stiffness than shorter shanks having similar cross-sectional areas. However, relatively long handles with relatively low thicknesses tend to flex away easily, and relatively low bending stiffness results in reduced plaque removal efficiency on the tooth surface. In addition, such handles provide poor maneuverability in the oral cavity during brushing. To compensate for said low bending stiffness of the longer shank, the size of the cross-sectional area of the shank may be increased. However, a relatively thick handle may also reduce the convenience of rotating the brush in the hand, thereby impeding the user from reaching all areas in the mouth. Therefore, the maneuverability of the entire brush is insufficient.

In order to achieve and maintain good oral health, and to prevent gingivitis, it is important to thoroughly clean the teeth and gums, especially in difficult to reach areas (e.g., in the area of the posterior molars). In addition, the gap between the teeth and the periodontal tissue (the so-called gingival sulcus) must be thoroughly cleaned, which requires a well coordinated brushing technique. It is known that lack of good removal of plaque in the gingival sulcus can lead to gingivitis, i.e. inflammation of the gingival tissue. In addition, it is known that users/consumers use different brushing techniques, and therefore when using all types of brushing techniques, it is crucial to identify the best ergonomics of the toothbrush in order to provide a good sensory feel during brushing.

It is an object of the present disclosure to provide an oral care implement that overcomes at least one of the above disadvantages, in particular, that provides for higher comfort and improved operability of the oral care implement in an oral care cavity during brushing by optimizing the ergonomics of the overall toothbrush. It is also an object of the present disclosure to provide a method for manufacturing such an oral care implement.

Disclosure of Invention

According to one aspect, there is provided an oral care implement comprising a head and a handle, the head having a length extension and the handle having a length extension, the length extensions of the head and the handle together defining an overall length extension of the oral care implement along a longitudinal axis, the overall length extension of the oral care implement being from about 194mm to about 197mm, wherein a ratio of the length extension of the handle to the overall length extension of the oral care implement is from about 0.59 to about 0.65.

according to one aspect, there is provided a method for manufacturing such an oral care implement, the method comprising the steps of:

-injection moulding a first part of polypropylene material forming an underlying base structure of the oral care implement,

-injection moulding a second part of polypropylene material over the first part,

-injection moulding a third part of thermoplastic elastomer material over the first and second parts.

Drawings

The invention is described in more detail below with reference to various embodiments and the accompanying drawings, in which:

Fig. 1 shows a side view of an exemplary embodiment of an oral care implement according to the present disclosure;

FIG. 2 shows a top view of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 shows a portion of the handle of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 shows a graph emphasizing the impact of toothbrush ergonomics on the overall consumer product experience;

FIG. 5 illustrates a "slanted" grip pattern;

FIG. 6 illustrates a "distal tilt" grip pattern;

FIG. 7 illustrates a "strength" grip pattern;

FIG. 8 illustrates a "precision" grip pattern; and

Fig. 9 shows a "chopsticks" grip pattern.

Detailed Description

An oral care implement according to the present disclosure includes a handle and a head to which at least one tooth cleaning element (e.g., a bristle tuft) and/or one or more elastomeric elements can be secured.

The handle and the head of the oral care implement each have a length extension that extends along a longitudinal extension of the oral care implement. The length extension of the head and the length extension of the handle together define an overall length extension of the oral care implement.

The length extension of the handle is defined as the section/portion of the oral care implement that extends from the distal end to the proximal end (i.e., to the end of the handle closest to the head). In other words, the head and handle merge at the proximal end of the handle. At the proximal end of the handle, the distance between the front and rear surfaces of the handle may have a maximum (when seen in side view, see fig. 3). In some cases, an oral care implement is defined as having a head, a handle, and a neck, the latter extending between the head and the handle. Hereinafter and in accordance with the present disclosure, the neck (typically having a smallest cross-sectional area extending substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the overall oral care implement) is defined as a portion of the brush head.

Unexpectedly, consumer testing results indicate that specific ergonomic technical parameters of a manual toothbrush have a significant impact on the overall product experience. As shown in fig. 4, the ergonomic impact on the overall product experience is about 27%. The impact of cleaning/refreshing is about 38%, followed by an impact of softness of about 29%. The impact of the visual appearance of the toothbrush on the overall product experience is only about 6%. From these test results, the ergonomics of manual toothbrushes is a major driver of consumer/user appeal; surprisingly, the effect is similar to that of softness. In other words, the ergonomics of the toothbrush is as important as softness in order to achieve the desired product experience of the toothbrush. Without proper ergonomics, toothbrushes do not clean with sufficient cleaning satisfaction in all areas of the mouth.

in addition, consumer test results indicate that the following parameters are key drivers of ergonomics and therefore have a significant impact on the overall product experience: an overall length extension of the oral care implement, a ratio of the length extension of the handle to the overall length extension of the oral care implement, a size of a thumb rest area, a direction of curvature (concave/convex) of the thumb rest, and an angle of the thumb rest. These parameters are varied and tested to identify the desired combination of parameters.

In principle, there are five different grip patterns or ways to hold a toothbrush during brushing: "lean", "distal lean", "strength", "precision", and "chopsticks". These grip patterns may be defined by the following characteristics (see fig. 5 to 9):

"Tilt": is frequently used; the handle weight lies loosely in the palm; the thumb extends relative to the index finger; similar to cutting with a knife, allows for good grasping and navigation. Most commonly used for brushing teeth, as this is a common pattern used for multiple occasions of the day (e.g., eating, combing, brushing). In most cases, consumers using this style are applying scrubbing techniques (i.e., moving back and forth) to clean their teeth.

"distal tilt": is very common; the handle weight lies loosely in the palm; the thumb and ring finger are opposite each other; similar to cutting with a knife, allows for good grasping and navigation. It is also common to brush teeth, as this is a common pattern for multiple occasions of the day (e.g., eating, combing, brushing). In most cases, consumers using this style are applying scrubbing techniques (i.e., moving back and forth) to clean their teeth.

"strength": is not used frequently; the fingers are tightly wrapped around the handle; the thumb is mostly extended or tightly wrapped around the handle; by consumers who believe "greater pressure may better clean" or as one of many varying patterns for areas that consumers need better control during brushing (e.g., at the posterior molars or internal tooth surfaces). Some consumers hold the handle at the lower end in order to reduce pressure. Most children will also use this model when they start brushing their teeth.

"accurate": is not used frequently; the weight of the handle is primarily on the fingertips; the thumb and forefinger being opposite one another; since this is a non-pressure pattern, it is typically used in hard to reach or sensitive areas (e.g., at the inner tooth surface). It is often considered to be a "distal slope" or "sloped" transitional grip, but some consumers use it as their "unique grip style".

The 'chopsticks': are often used in the chopstick area; the index finger and thumb oppose each other, thereby tightly holding the handle. Based on consumer habits, i.e. "chopstick" styles are common in asia; very familiar because it is often used in other contexts; similar to the "exact" pattern, serves as a gentle means for cleaning hard to reach or sensitive areas.

Surprisingly, consumer testing has shown that the overall length extension of the oral care implement along its longitudinal axis (about 194mm to about 197mm, or about 195mm to about 196mm, or about 195mm), in combination with the ratio of the length extension of the handle to the overall length extension of the oral care implement (about 0.59 to about 0.65, or about 0.60 to about 0.64, or about 0.61 to about 0.63, or about 0.62), provides an improved overall product experience to the user/consumer. When any of the above grip patterns is applied, the maneuverability of the toothbrush according to the present disclosure is significantly improved. Consumer testing has shown that the toothbrush of the present disclosure allows for a well-coordinated brushing technique. These consumer tests were conducted by american americans in germany. The consumers of the test panel applied a combination of the above grip patterns and given their assessment with respect to ergonomics (see table 1 below).

The handle extension may be about 119mm to about 123mm, or about 121 mm. The head extension may be about 72mm to about 76mm, or about 74 mm.

the handle of the oral care implement may include a thumb rest having an area of about 202mm2 to about 360mm2, or about 250mm2 to about 353mm2, or about 270mm2 to about 350mm2, or about 290mm2, or about 340mm 2. Such thumb rest may be made of a thermoplastic elastomer, for example, having a shore a hardness of about 30 to about 60, or about 40, to prevent the oral care implement from slipping too much when used in wet conditions. The handle may be made of two or three different materials, one of which may be a polypropylene material.

At least a portion of the thumb rest may have a concave shape. A portion of the area of the thumb rest is inclined at an angle a of about 20 ° to about 25 °, or about 24 °, relative to the area of the remainder of the thumb rest.

The overall length extension of the oral care implement may be about 195mm, the ratio of the length extension of the handle to the overall length extension of the oral care implement may be about 0.62, and the area of the thumb rest is about 290mm2 or about 340mm2, and the angle a may be about 24 °. Such ergonomics can improve the control and maneuverability of the oral care tool during brushing (see table 1 below).

The thumb rest or gripping region may be attached to the front surface of the handle in a region near the proximal end (i.e., closest to the head). The thumb rest may include a plurality of ribs extending substantially perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the oral care implement. Such ribs may allow a user/consumer to use the oral care implement with even more control. The user/consumer can better grip and manipulate the handle of the oral care implement during brushing. Such handles can provide further improved control and greater comfort during brushing, particularly in wet conditions.

A method for manufacturing an oral care implement according to the present disclosure may include the steps of:

-injection moulding a first part of polypropylene material forming an underlying base structure of the oral care implement,

-injection moulding a second part of polypropylene material over the first part,

-injection moulding a third part of thermoplastic elastomer material over the first part and/or the second part.

The third component of thermoplastic elastomer material may form a thumb rest on a front surface of the oral care implement and a palm grip on a rear surface opposite the front surface for grasping by the fingers and thumb of the user/consumer. Such a handle configuration may even further resist slippage during use. The thermoplastic elastomer material may extend through apertures provided in the underlying chassis and/or the second component of the handle.

The oral care implement may be a manual toothbrush or an electric toothbrush. The oral care implement may also be a proximal pick, a plaque scraper, or a tissue/tongue cleaner.

The following is a non-limiting discussion of exemplary embodiments of oral care implements and components thereof according to the present disclosure, wherein reference is made to the accompanying drawings.

Fig. 1 and 2 show two projections of an oral care implement 10 (i.e., toothbrush 10 of the present disclosure). Fig. 1 shows a side view of toothbrush 10, while fig. 2 shows a corresponding top view.

toothbrush 10 includes a head 12 and a handle 14. The overall length extension 16 of the toothbrush 10 along its longitudinal axis 22 is made up of the length extension 18 of the head 12 and the length extension 20 of the handle 14. The overall length extension 16 of the toothbrush 10 is about 195mm, while the length extension 18 of the head 12 is about 74mm, and the length extension 20 of the handle 14 is about 121 mm. Thus, the ratio of the length extension 20 of the handle 14 to the overall length extension 16 of the toothbrush 10 is about 0.62. The handle has a distal end 52 furthest from the head 12 and a proximal end 54 closest to the head 12.

The length extension 20 of the handle 14 extends from a distal end 52 to a proximal end 54, i.e., to the end of the handle 14 closest to the head 12. The head 12 and handle 14 merge at the proximal end 54 of the handle 14. At the proximal end 54 of the handle 14, the distance 56 between the front surface 34 and the rear surface 38 of the handle 14 may have a maximum value (when viewed in side elevation, see fig. 3).

the handle 14 may be made of three different materials: the first part 24 of polypropylene material provided by the injection molding step forms the underlying base structure 26. A second part 28 of another polypropylene material is injection moulded over the first part 24 and a third part 30 of a thermoplastic elastomer material is injection moulded over the first and second parts 24, 28. The third piece 30 of thermoplastic elastomer material may provide a thumb rest 32 on a front surface 34 of the handle 14, and a palm grip 36 on a rear surface 38 of the handle 14, the rear surface 38 being opposite the front surface 34.

The polypropylene material of the first part and the polypropylene material of the second part may differ only in colour. Both polypropylene materials are relatively hard compared to the thermoplastic elastomer material of the third component. The thermoplastic elastomer material of the third component may have a shore a hardness of about 30 to about 60, or about 40.

The thumb rest 32 has an area 40 of about 290mm2 or about 340mm 2. The thumb rest 32 is concave in shape, i.e., the thumb rest curves inwardly relative to the handle. As shown in fig. 3, a portion of the thumb rest 32 is inclined at an angle a relative to the remainder of the thumb rest 32. The angle α may be about 24 ° and is defined between the first line 42 and the second line 44. The first line 42 extends between a highest point or peak 46 of the thumb rest 32 and a lowest point 48 of the thumb rest 32 (as shown in the side view of FIG. 3). The second line 44 extends between a lowest point 48 of the thumb rest 32 and an endpoint 50 (i.e., the farthest point of the thumb rest 32 closest to a distal end 52 of the handle 14).

Fig. 4 shows a graph 70 that highlights the impact of toothbrush ergonomics 60 on the overall consumer product experience. Consumer test results indicate that the impact of ergonomics 60 on the overall product experience is about 27%. The impact of clean/refresh 62 is about 38% followed by the impact of softness 64 is about 29%. The impact of the visual appearance 66 of the toothbrush on the overall product experience is only about 6%.

there are five different grip patterns or ways to hold the toothbrush during brushing. Fig. 5 shows an "inclined" grip pattern, fig. 6 shows a "distal inclined" grip pattern, fig. 7 shows a "power" grip pattern, fig. 8 shows a "precision" grip pattern, and fig. 9 shows a "chopsticks" grip pattern. The above describes the properties when using the corresponding grip pattern.

Comparative experiment

Consumer testing was performed by 20 trained and experienced panelists. Panelists were asked to score the toothbrushes on an ergonomic and manipulability scale of "0" to "10", where "10" represents the best score. The panelists brushed their teeth in front of the mirror, thereby reflecting the actual use.

The following toothbrushes were tested: exemplary embodiment 10 according to fig. 1-3, and comparative examples 100, 200, 300, and 400 according to the toothbrush specifications of table 1.

Table 1: toothbrush specification

The test results clearly show the performance advantages in ergonomics and maneuverability of the toothbrush of the present disclosure (exemplary embodiment 10) as compared to toothbrushes according to comparative examples 100, 200, 300, and 400. Although the toothbrush of the exemplary embodiment 10 obtained a rating of "7.56" on a scale of "0" to "10", the comparative examples 100, 200, 300, and 400 received only a rating between "3.2" and "6.0".

The data set forth in Table 1 clearly illustrates the specific configuration/ergonomic synergy of toothbrush embodiment 10. In particular, the data shows that a particular combination of a total length extension of the toothbrush of about 194mm to about 197mm, and a ratio of the length extension of the handle to the total length extension of the toothbrush of about 0.59 to about 0.65 provides improved maneuverability and control over toothbrushes having parameters below or above the ranges. For example, the comparative exemplary embodiment 400 has an overall length extension of about 195 mm. However, because the ratio of the length extension of the handle to the overall length extension of the toothbrush is relatively high (i.e., 0.66), the performance of the toothbrush is relatively poor, resulting in only a "6.0" score. Also, while the ratio of the length extension of the handle to the overall length extension of the toothbrush of the comparative example embodiment 300 is about 0.62, the score of the toothbrush is also relatively low ("5.95") because the overall length extension of the toothbrush is too short (about 193 mm).

In the context of this disclosure, the term "substantially" refers to an arrangement of elements or features that, while in theory would be expected to exhibit exact correspondence or behavior, may in fact render something somewhat less precise. Also, the term represents the extent to which: quantitative values, measurement values, or other related representations may vary from the stated reference without resulting in a change in the basic function of the subject matter at issue.

The dimensions and values disclosed herein are not to be understood as being strictly limited to the exact numerical values recited. Rather, unless otherwise specified, each such dimension is intended to mean both the recited value and a functionally equivalent range surrounding that value. For example, a dimension disclosed as "40 mm" is intended to mean "about 40 mm".