阅读说明：本技术 一种scr催化剂性能评价及寿命预估方法 (SCR catalyst performance evaluation and service life estimation method ) 是由 姚燕 杨恂 杨晓宁 王乐乐 孔凡海 宋玉宝 王丽朋 雷嗣远 马云龙 鲍强 卿梦磊 于 2021-07-19 设计创作，主要内容包括：本发明涉及一种SCR催化剂性能评价及寿命预估方法,包括如下步骤：确定催化剂的氨逃逸阈值；对当前时间催化剂进行检测试验,得到当前实际氨逃逸值,并对催化剂的初始性能进行评估；对催化剂运行设定时间后的氨逃逸值进行预估计算；催化剂运行设定时间后进行检测试验,得到设定时间的氨逃逸实测值,并对催化剂在设定时间的性能进行评估；综合两次比较结果,对催化剂的性能进行评估；根据设定时间的氨逃逸实测值,计算剩余运行寿命预估值。本发明可及时分析催化剂性能优劣的原因并采取相应措施,通过对催化剂寿命进行预估可提前制定检修计划,为SCR催化剂的实际运行过程提供依据,防止提前更换催化剂造成损失,同时保证了机组的环保性能符合要求。(The invention relates to a method for evaluating performance and estimating service life of an SCR catalyst, which comprises the following steps: determining an ammonia slip threshold for the catalyst; detecting and testing the catalyst at the current time to obtain a current actual ammonia escape value, and evaluating the initial performance of the catalyst; carrying out pre-estimation calculation on an ammonia escape value after the catalyst operates for a set time; carrying out a detection test after the catalyst runs for a set time to obtain an ammonia escape measured value of the set time, and evaluating the performance of the catalyst at the set time; integrating the two comparison results to evaluate the performance of the catalyst; and calculating a residual operation life estimated value according to the ammonia escape measured value at the set time. The invention can analyze the cause of the catalyst performance in time and take corresponding measures, can make a maintenance plan in advance by estimating the service life of the catalyst, provides basis for the actual operation process of the SCR catalyst, prevents the loss caused by replacing the catalyst in advance, and ensures that the environmental protection performance of a unit meets the requirement.)

1. A method for evaluating the performance and estimating the service life of an SCR catalyst is characterized by comprising the following steps: the method comprises the following steps:

s1: obtaining the design life T of the catalyst to be evaluated₀(ii) a Determining an ammonia slip threshold of said catalyst

S2: carrying out a denitration efficiency-ammonia escape detection test on the catalyst at the current time to obtain a current actual ammonia escape valueAccording to the ammonia escape threshold of the catalystAnd current actual ammonia slip valueCarrying out comparative evaluation on the initial performance of the catalyst;

s3: carrying out pre-estimation calculation on the ammonia escape value after the catalyst operates for the set time t to obtain an ammonia escape estimated value of the set time

S4: after the catalyst is operated for a set time t, a denitration efficiency-ammonia escape detection test is carried out to obtain an ammonia escape measured value at the set timeAmmonia slip prediction based on set timeAnd measured value of ammonia slip at set timeCarrying out comparative evaluation on the performance of the catalyst at a set time t;

S5：evaluating the performance of the catalyst based on the comparison of S2 and S4; ammonia escape measured value according to set timeAnd calculating a residual operation life estimated value delta T.

2. The method for evaluating the performance and estimating the lifetime of an SCR catalyst according to claim 1, wherein: at S1, the ammonia slip thresholdThe catalyst ammonia slip data are the average of the experimental statistics.

3. The method for evaluating the performance and estimating the lifetime of an SCR catalyst according to claim 1, wherein: in S1, the catalyst is: multiple layers of new catalysts are connected in series, or the new catalyst and the in-service catalyst are combined, or the catalyst is detected for the first time after regeneration.

4. The method for evaluating the performance and estimating the lifetime of an SCR catalyst according to claim 1, wherein: in S2, the comparison of the initial performance of the catalysts was evaluated as: if it isIs greater thanThe initial performance of the catalyst is poor ifIs less than or equal toThe initial performance of the catalyst is good.

5. The method for evaluating the performance and estimating the lifetime of an SCR catalyst according to claim 1, wherein: in S3, the setting time T is less than the design life T₀。

6. The method for evaluating the performance and estimating the lifetime of an SCR catalyst according to claim 1, wherein: at S3, the estimated value of ammonia slip is setComprises the following steps:

wherein:

an estimated value of ammonia slip for a set time, in mul/L,

t is a set time in units of h.

7. The method for evaluating the performance and estimating the lifetime of an SCR catalyst according to claim 1, wherein: in S4, the catalyst is evaluated for comparison at a set time t as: if it isIs greater than or equal toThe actual degradation rate is slower than the design degradation rate and the catalyst performs well if it is not usedIs less thanThe actual degradation rate is faster than the design degradation rate and the catalyst is less performing.

8. The method for evaluating the performance and estimating the lifetime of an SCR catalyst according to claim 1, wherein: in S5, the performance evaluation of the catalyst includes:

(1) if it isAnd isThe initial performance of the catalyst is poor, but the actual degradation rate is slower than the design degradation rate, the catalyst meets the design requirements,

(2) if it isAnd isThe initial performance of the catalyst is poor and the actual degradation rate is faster than the designed degradation rate, the catalyst itself has quality problems,

(3) if it isAnd isThe catalyst performs well initially and the actual degradation rate is slower than the designed degradation rate, the catalyst performs well,

(4) if it isAnd isThe initial performance of the catalyst is good, but the actual degradation rate is faster than the designed degradation rate, and the catalyst itself has no quality problems.

9. The method for evaluating the performance and estimating the lifetime of an SCR catalyst according to claim 1, wherein: in S5, the estimated remaining operating life Δ T is:

ΔT＝T₀-T，

T＝9576+13158′In(C_NH3,2)，

wherein:

at is an estimated value of remaining operating life, in units of h,

T₀for the design life, in units of h,

t corrects run time in units of h.

10. The method for evaluating the performance and estimating the lifetime of an SCR catalyst according to claim 1, wherein: in S5, if the remaining operation life prediction value Δ T is less than 0, the catalyst is deactivated in advance.

Technical Field

The invention belongs to the technical field of SCR denitration catalysts, and particularly relates to a method for evaluating the performance and estimating the service life of an SCR catalyst.

Background

Under the requirement of deep emission reduction of the current coal-fired power plant, the denitration reactor is generally provided with SCR catalysts according to a mode of 3 layers or more than 3 layers. When the performance of the whole catalyst can not meet the design requirement, the catalyst needs to be additionally installed or replaced by a new catalyst or the deactivated catalyst needs to be regenerated and the like according to the detection result of the catalyst.

According to an SCR denitration reaction formula, under the condition of sufficient ammonia nitrogen molar ratio, the denitration efficiency is only the intrinsic capacity of the catalyst, but because escaping ammonia generated by excessive ammonia injection and sulfur trioxide in the flue gas generate ammonium bisulfate, the ammonium bisulfate has great influence on downstream cold end equipment of a unit, the quality of coal ash and the like, the SCR flue gas denitration technology can be considered to be an ammonia control technology under the condition of finishing the emission requirement of nitrogen oxides under certain conditions.

As the core of SCR denitration technology, effective detection and evaluation on the chemical performance of a catalyst are important guarantees for safe operation of a coal-fired unit, and the current denitration performance evaluation method of the catalyst mainly comprises the following steps: a single-layer activity evaluation method and an ammonia escape method for the denitration efficiency of the whole catalyst. The catalyst activity is an indicator of the test results of the SCR catalyst under the designed flue gas conditions (temperature, flue gas amount), and is a relative value for evaluating the change in the catalyst performance. The denitration efficiency-ammonia escape method of the whole catalyst is to perform pilot-plant test bench detection and evaluation on the catalyst according to the designed arrangement layer number, which is beneficial to eliminating the influence of external factors such as the uniformity of a reactor flow field, the uniformity of ammonia spraying and the like.

Disclosure of Invention

The invention aims to provide a method for evaluating the performance and estimating the service life of an SCR (selective catalytic reduction) catalyst, which is used for solving the problem that the performance and the service life of the catalyst cannot be evaluated in time by the conventional evaluation method.

In order to achieve the purpose, the invention adopts the technical scheme that:

an SCR catalyst performance evaluation and service life estimation method comprises the following steps:

s1: obtaining the design life T of the catalyst to be evaluated₀(ii) a Determining an ammonia slip threshold of said catalyst

S2: carrying out a denitration efficiency-ammonia escape detection test on the catalyst at the current time to obtain a current actual ammonia escape valueAccording to the ammonia escape threshold of the catalystAnd current actual ammonia slip valueInitial performance of the catalystComparative evaluation can be performed;

s3: carrying out pre-estimation calculation on the ammonia escape value after the catalyst operates for the set time t to obtain an ammonia escape estimated value of the set time

S4: after the catalyst is operated for a set time t, a denitration efficiency-ammonia escape detection test is carried out to obtain an ammonia escape measured value at the set timeAmmonia slip prediction based on set timeAnd measured value of ammonia slip at set timeCarrying out comparative evaluation on the performance of the catalyst at a set time t;

s5: evaluating the performance of the catalyst according to the comparison results of S2 and S4, analyzing the reason of the performance of the catalyst and taking measures; ammonia escape measured value according to set timeAnd calculating a residual operation life estimated value delta T and making a maintenance plan.

Preferably, in S1, the ammonia slip threshold valueThe catalyst ammonia slip data are the average of the experimental statistics.

Preferably, in S1, the catalyst is: multiple layers of new catalysts are connected in series, or the new catalyst and the in-service catalyst are combined, or the catalyst is detected for the first time after regeneration.

Preferably, in S2, the comparison of the initial performance of the catalyst is evaluated as: if it isIs greater thanThe initial performance of the catalyst is poor ifIs less than or equal toThe initial performance of the catalyst is good.

Preferably, in S3, the set time T is less than the design life T₀。

Preferably, in S3, the predicted value of ammonia slip is set for a predetermined timeComprises the following steps:

wherein:

an estimated value of ammonia slip for a set time, in mul/L,

t is a set time in units of h.

Preferably, in S4, the catalyst is evaluated in comparison at a set time t as: if it isIs greater than or equal toThe actual degradation rate is slower than the design degradation rate and the catalyst performs well if it is not usedIs less thanThe actual degradation rate is faster than the design degradation rate and the catalyst is less performing.

Preferably, in S5, the performance evaluation of the catalyst includes:

(1) if it isAnd isThe initial performance of the catalyst is poor, but the actual degradation rate is slower than the designed degradation rate, so that the catalyst meets the design requirement due to the existence of coal quality change or good actual operation management of a power plant, the measures are to perform fixed period sampling detection and perform catalyst loading, reloading or regeneration according to the detection result,

(2) if it isAnd isThe initial performance of the catalyst is poor, and the actual degradation rate is faster than the designed degradation rate, so the catalyst has quality problems because the catalyst is inferior catalyst doped with waste or the actual volume amount of the catalyst is insufficient, the measure is to require a catalyst manufacturer to replace the catalyst,

(3) if it isAnd isThe catalyst has good initial performance and the actual degradation rate is slower than the designed degradation rate, the catalyst has good performance for reasonsThe catalyst is a high-quality catalyst, the measure is to calculate the residual operable time, avoid the loss caused by replacing the catalyst in advance,

(4) if it isAnd isThe initial performance of the catalyst is good, but the actual degradation rate is faster than the designed degradation rate, so that the catalyst does not have quality problems, the degradation is accelerated due to the low-load operation of the unit SCR denitration equipment or the change of coal burning conditions, and the measures are to evaluate the coal burning conditions, the flow uniformity of an SCR device and the ammonia spraying uniformity to prevent the reoccurrence.

Preferably, in S5, the estimated remaining operational life Δ T is:

ΔT＝T₀-T，

T＝9576+13158′In(C_NH3,2)，

wherein:

at is an estimated value of remaining operating life, in units of h,

T₀for the design life, in units of h,

t corrects run time in units of h.

Preferably, in S5, if the estimated remaining operating life Δ T is less than 0, the catalyst is deactivated in advance and the catalyst loading or reloading or regeneration should be performed in time.

Due to the application of the technical scheme, compared with the prior art, the invention has the following advantages:

according to the invention, the performance of the catalyst is evaluated, the reason of the performance of the catalyst can be analyzed in time and corresponding measures are taken, and the service life of the catalyst is estimated, so that a maintenance plan can be made in advance, a basis is provided for the actual operation process of the SCR catalyst, the great economic loss caused by the advance replacement of the catalyst is prevented, and the environmental protection performance of a unit is ensured to meet the requirements.

Drawings

FIG. 1 is a graph of the experimental statistical ammonia slip data for the catalyst of this example;

FIG. 2 is a graph fitting the equation for calculating the estimated ammonia slip for a set time according to the present embodiment.

Detailed Description

The technical solutions of the present invention will be described clearly and completely with reference to the accompanying drawings, and it should be understood that the described embodiments are some, but not all embodiments of the present invention. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.

An SCR catalyst performance evaluation and service life estimation method specifically comprises the following steps:

S1：

obtaining the design life T of the catalyst to be evaluated₀The catalyst to be evaluated is a multilayer new catalyst in series connection, or a combination of the new catalyst and an in-service catalyst, or a catalyst detected for the first time after regeneration;

determining an ammonia slip threshold for a catalystThreshold value of ammonia slipThe average value of the ammonia escape data of the catalyst is calculated after unreasonable high values are removed during statistics.

S2：

Carrying out a denitration efficiency-ammonia escape detection test on the catalyst at the current time to obtain a current actual ammonia escape valueAnd according to the ammonia slip threshold of the catalystAnd current actual ammonia slip valueComparative evaluation of the initial performance of the catalysts, in particular:

(1) if the current actual ammonia slip valueGreater than the ammonia slip thresholdThe initial performance of the catalyst is poor;

(2) if the current actual ammonia slip valueLess than or equal to the ammonia escape thresholdThe initial performance of the catalyst is good.

S3：

The ammonia escape value after the catalyst operation set time T is estimated and calculated, and the set time T is less than the design life T₀Obtaining the estimated value of ammonia escape at set timeTime-set ammonia slip predictionThe calculation formula (c) is obtained by fitting experimental data, as shown in fig. 2, specifically:

wherein:

an estimated value of ammonia slip for a set time, in mul/L,

t is a set time in units of h.

S4：

After the catalyst runs for a set time t, carrying out a denitration efficiency-ammonia escape detection test to obtain an ammonia escape measured value at the set timeAmmonia slip prediction based on set timeAnd measured value of ammonia slip at set timeThe performance of the catalyst at a set time t is comparatively evaluated. Specifically, the method comprises the following steps:

(1) prediction of ammonia slip if set timeMeasured value of ammonia slip of not less than set timeThe actual degradation rate is slower than the design degradation rate and the performance of the catalyst is good;

(2) prediction of ammonia slip if set timeMeasured value of ammonia slip less than set timeThe actual degradation rate is faster than the design degradation rate and the performance of the catalyst is poor.

S5：

According to the results of the comparison of S2 and S4, the performance of the catalyst is evaluated, the cause of the performance of the catalyst is analyzed, and measures are taken, specifically:

(1) if the current actual ammonia slip valueGreater than the ammonia slip thresholdAnd a time-set ammonia slip estimateMeasured value of ammonia slip of not less than set timeThe initial performance of the catalyst is poor, but the actual degradation rate is slower than the designed degradation rate, so that the catalyst meets the design requirement due to the fact that coal quality change conditions exist or the actual operation management of a power plant is good, the measures are that fixed period sampling detection is carried out, and the catalyst is additionally installed, replaced or regenerated according to the detection result;

(2) if the current actual ammonia slip valueGreater than the ammonia slip thresholdAnd a time-set ammonia slip estimateMeasured value of ammonia slip less than set timeThe initial performance of the catalyst is poor, and the actual degradation rate is faster than the designed degradation rate, so that the catalyst has quality problems due to the poor catalyst with waste or insufficient actual volume of the catalyst, and the catalyst manufacturer is required to replace the catalyst;

(3) if the current actual ammonia slip valueLess than or equal to the ammonia escape thresholdAnd a time-set ammonia slip estimateMeasured value of ammonia slip of not less than set timeThe initial performance of the catalyst is good, and the actual degradation rate is slower than the designed degradation rate, so that the performance of the catalyst is good because the catalyst is a high-quality catalyst, and the measure is to calculate the residual operable time so as to avoid loss caused by replacing the catalyst in advance;

(4) if the current actual ammonia slip valueLess than or equal to the ammonia escape thresholdAnd a time-set ammonia slip estimateMeasured value of ammonia slip less than set timeThe initial performance of the catalyst is good, but the actual degradation rate is faster than the designed degradation rate, so that the quality problem of the catalyst does not exist, the degradation is accelerated due to the low-load operation of the unit SCR denitration equipment or the change of the coal burning condition, and the measures are to evaluate the coal burning condition, the flow uniformity of an SCR device and the ammonia spraying uniformity to prevent the reoccurrence.

Ammonia escape measured value according to set timeCalculating a predicted value delta T of the residual operation life, making a maintenance plan, and if the predicted value delta T of the residual operation life is less than 0, inactivating the catalyst in advance and timelyCarrying out catalyst loading or reloading or regeneration, specifically:

ΔT＝T₀-T，

T＝9576+13158′In(C_NH3,2)，

wherein:

at is an estimated value of remaining operating life, in units of h,

T₀for the design life, in units of h,

t corrects run time in units of h.

The first embodiment is as follows:

the initially-installed 2-layer catalyst of a 300MW coal-fired unit of a power plant is subjected to performance evaluation and life estimation, and the method specifically comprises the following steps:

s1: design life T of the catalyst to be evaluated₀24000h, the design index of ammonia escape of the catalyst at 24000h is 3 muL/L; as shown in FIG. 1, the ammonia slip threshold of the catalyst is determined0.8 muL/L;

s2: carrying out a denitration efficiency-ammonia escape detection test on the catalyst at the current time to obtain a current actual ammonia escape value1.0 muL/L, is larger than the ammonia escape threshold0.8. mu.L/L, and therefore the initial performance of the catalyst is poor.

S3: carrying out pre-estimation calculation on the ammonia escape value after the catalyst operates for a set time t, wherein the set time t is 16000h, and obtaining the ammonia escape estimated value of the set time1.6 mu L/L;

s4: after the catalyst runs for a set time, carrying out a denitration efficiency-ammonia escape detection test to obtain an ammonia escape measured value at the set timeAt 2.3 μ L/L, the estimated value of ammonia slip is set for a timeMeasured value of ammonia slip less than set timeThe actual degradation rate is faster than the designed degradation rate, and the performance of the catalyst at the set time is poor;

s5: according to the comparison results of S2 and S4, the current actual ammonia slip value1.0 muL/L, is larger than the ammonia escape thresholdThe initial performance of the catalyst is poor, and the estimated value of ammonia escape in set time1.6 μ L/L, measured value of ammonia slip less than set time2.3 muL/L, the actual degradation rate is faster than the design degradation rate, so the actual running time of the catalyst can be judged to be short and the design life is prolonged; and calculating to obtain a corrected operation time T of 20535h and a residual operation life estimated value delta T of 3465h, and making an adding or reloading plan in advance according to a calculation result.

Example two:

the initially-installed 3-layer catalyst of a 600MW coal-fired unit of a certain power plant is subjected to performance evaluation and life estimation, and the method specifically comprises the following steps:

s1: design life T of the catalyst to be evaluated₀24000h, the design index of ammonia escape of the catalyst at 24000h is 3 muL/L; as shown in FIG. 1, the ammonia slip threshold of the catalyst is determined0.8 muL/L;

s2: carrying out a denitration efficiency-ammonia escape detection test on the catalyst at the current time to obtain a current actual ammonia escape value1.2 muL/L, greater than the ammonia escape threshold0.8. mu.L/L, and therefore the initial performance of the catalyst is poor.

S3: carrying out pre-estimation calculation on the ammonia escape value after the catalyst operates for a set time t, wherein the set time t is 21000h, and obtaining the ammonia escape estimated value of the set time2.4 muL/L;

s4: after the catalyst runs for a set time, carrying out a denitration efficiency-ammonia escape detection test to obtain an ammonia escape measured value at the set time1.9 μ L/L, the estimated value of ammonia slip is set for a timeMeasured value of ammonia slip greater than set timeThe actual degradation rate is slower than the designed degradation rate, and the performance of the catalyst at the set time is good;

s5: according to the comparison results of S2 and S4, the current actual ammonia slip value1.2 muL/L, greater than the ammonia escape threshold0.8. mu.L/L of (1),the initial performance of the catalyst is poor, and the estimated value of ammonia escape in set timeMeasured value of ammonia slip at 2.4. mu.L/L, which is greater than set time1.9 muL/L, the actual degradation rate is slower than the designed degradation rate, so that the catalyst can be judged to meet the design requirement due to the existence of coal quality change or good actual operation management of a power plant, the measure is to perform fixed period sampling detection and perform catalyst loading, reloading or regeneration according to the detection result; and calculating to obtain a corrected operation time T of 18022h, a predicted value delta T of the residual operation life of 5978h, wherein the actual operation time of the catalyst exceeds the designed life time, and the efficiency promotion plan of catalyst replacement or regeneration can be delayed.

Example three:

the method specifically comprises the following steps of carrying out performance evaluation and service life prediction on 2 layers of catalysts initially installed in a 350MW coal-fired unit of a certain power plant:

s1: design life T of the catalyst to be evaluated₀24000h, the design index of ammonia escape of the catalyst at 24000h is 3 muL/L; as shown in FIG. 1, the ammonia slip threshold of the catalyst is determined0.8 muL/L;

s2: carrying out a denitration efficiency-ammonia escape detection test on the catalyst at the current time to obtain a current actual ammonia escape value0.8 μ L/L, equal to the ammonia slip threshold0.8. mu.L/L, so that the initial performance of the catalyst is good.

S3: carrying out pre-estimation calculation on the ammonia escape value after the catalyst operates for a set time t, wherein the set time t is 4500h to obtainTime-set ammonia slip prediction0.7 mu L/L;

s4: after the catalyst runs for a set time, carrying out a denitration efficiency-ammonia escape detection test to obtain an ammonia escape measured value at the set timeAt 3.2 μ L/L, the estimated value of ammonia slip is set for a timeMeasured value of ammonia slip less than set timeThe actual degradation rate is faster than the designed degradation rate, and the performance of the catalyst at the set time is poor;

s5: according to the comparison results of S2 and S4, the current actual ammonia slip value0.8 μ L/L, equal to the ammonia slip threshold0.8 muL/L, the initial performance of the catalyst is good, and the estimated value of ammonia slip is set for time0.7. mu.L/L, measured value of ammonia slip less than set time3.2 μ L/L, the actual degradation rate is faster than the designed degradation rate, so it can be judged that the catalyst is abnormally deactivated; and calculating to obtain corrected running time T of 24880h, obtaining a predicted value delta T of the residual running life of-881 h, and inactivating the catalyst in advance, wherein the inactivation reason is searched according to the calculation result, and the catalyst replacement maintenance plan is carried out as soon as possible. After the physical and chemical analysis and on-site investigation of SCR catalyst, the determination machineThe group adopts high-arsenic coal, and proposes a power plant to adjust the design life or adopts measures for delaying the arsenic poisoning of the catalyst, thereby prolonging the service life of the catalyst to the maximum extent.

Example four:

the initially-installed 3-layer catalyst of a 660MW coal-fired unit of a certain power plant is subjected to performance evaluation and service life prediction, and the method specifically comprises the following steps:

s1: design life T of the catalyst to be evaluated₀24000h, the design index of ammonia escape of the catalyst at 24000h is 3 muL/L; as shown in FIG. 1, the ammonia slip threshold of the catalyst is determined0.8 muL/L;

s2: carrying out a denitration efficiency-ammonia escape detection test on the catalyst at the current time to obtain a current actual ammonia escape value0.7 muL/L, less than the ammonia escape threshold0.8. mu.L/L, so that the initial performance of the catalyst is good.

S3: carrying out pre-estimation calculation on the ammonia escape value after the catalyst operates for a set time t, wherein the set time t is 20000h, and obtaining the ammonia escape pre-estimation value of the set time2.2 muL/L;

s4: after the catalyst runs for a set time, carrying out a denitration efficiency-ammonia escape detection test to obtain an ammonia escape measured value at the set timeAt 3.5 μ L/L, the estimated value of ammonia slip is set for a timeMeasured value of ammonia slip less than set timeThe actual degradation rate is faster than the design degradation rate, and the performance of the catalyst is poor;

s5: according to the comparison results of S2 and S4, the current actual ammonia slip value0.7 muL/L, less than the ammonia escape threshold0.8 muL/L, the initial performance of the catalyst is good, and the estimated value of ammonia slip is set for timeMeasured value of ammonia slip of 2.2. mu.L/L, which is less than set time3.5 muL/L, the actual degradation rate is faster than the designed degradation rate, so that the current catalyst can be judged not to meet the design performance requirement; and calculating to obtain a corrected operation time T of 29367h and a residual operation life estimated value delta T of-5367 h, and making an efficiency improvement plan for catalyst regeneration, replacement and the like in advance according to the calculation and actual measurement results. Through on-site investigation of the SCR denitration reactor, the situation of large-area dust deposition in the reactor is found, the plugging rate of the sampled catalyst reaches more than 30%, and the power plant is recommended to strengthen the dust blowing frequency of the SCR denitration device, so that the catalyst is prevented from being deteriorated too fast.

The above embodiments are merely illustrative of the technical ideas and features of the present invention, and the purpose thereof is to enable those skilled in the art to understand the contents of the present invention and implement the present invention, and not to limit the protection scope of the present invention. All equivalent changes and modifications made according to the spirit of the present invention should be covered within the protection scope of the present invention.