Infection risk evaluation method, infection risk evaluation system, and infection risk evaluation program
阅读说明:本技术 感染风险评价方法、感染风险评价系统以及感染风险评价程序 (Infection risk evaluation method, infection risk evaluation system, and infection risk evaluation program ) 是由 汤川系子 于 2019-06-18 设计创作,主要内容包括:一种感染风险评价方法,基于家庭成员各自的罹患信息、家庭成员的所属组织中的感染症的流行信息、以及对儿童和家庭成员间的感染风险进行了数值化而得到的1个以上的第1感染风险系数,算出表示儿童感染了感染症的感染风险的程度的第1感染风险值(S106),基于第1感染风险值,算出表示儿童在儿童所属的儿童设施的集体中感染感染症的感染风险的程度的第2感染风险值(S107),进行基于第1感染风险值来对儿童感染了感染症的感染风险进行评价的第1评价(S108)、和基于第2感染风险值来对儿童在集体中感染所述感染症的感染风险进行评价的第2评价(S109)。(An infection risk evaluation method calculates a 1 st infection risk value (S106) indicating the degree of infection risk of a child infected with an infection, based on the information on the occurrence of each family member, the prevalence information of the infection in the organization to which the family member belongs, and 1 or more 1 st infection risk coefficients obtained by digitizing the infection risk between the child and the family member, calculates a 2 nd infection risk value (S107) indicating the degree of infection risk of a child infected with an infection in a group of child facilities to which the child belongs, based on the 1 st infection risk value, and performs a 1 st evaluation (S108) for evaluating the infection risk of a child infected with an infection, based on the 1 st infection risk value, and a 2 nd evaluation (S109) for evaluating the infection risk of a child infected with an infection in a group, based on the 2 nd infection risk value.)
1. An infection risk evaluation method in an infection risk evaluation system for evaluating the infection risk of an infection in a child facility,
the computer of the infection risk assessment system is provided,
acquiring information on the occurrence of infection in each of 1 or more family members of a child,
acquiring prevalence information on prevalence of an infection in 1 or more organizations to which the 1 or more family members belong,
calculating a 1 st infection risk value indicating a degree of infection risk of the child with the infection based on the suffering information, the prevalence information, and 1 or more 1 st infection risk coefficients obtained by quantifying the infection risk between the child and each of the 1 or more family members,
calculating a 2 nd infection risk value based on the 1 st infection risk value, the 2 nd infection risk value representing a degree of infection risk of the child infecting the infection in a collective of the child facilities to which the child belongs,
performing at least one of an 1 st evaluation and a 2 nd evaluation, said 1 st evaluation comparing said 1 st infection risk value with a predetermined 1 st reference value and evaluating the infection risk of said child being infected with said infection, said 2 nd evaluation comparing said 2 nd infection risk value with a predetermined 2 nd reference value and evaluating the infection risk of said child in said collective infection with said infection,
and outputting the evaluation result of at least one of the 1 st evaluation and the 2 nd evaluation.
2. The method for evaluating infection risk according to claim 1,
the infection information is associated with a 1 st value indicating that the infection is infected and a 2 nd value indicating that the infection is prevailing in the belonging tissue, for each predetermined time, for each of the 1 or more family members,
the 1 st infection risk value is calculated by adding, per the predetermined time, a 1 st sum and a 2 nd sum, the 1 st sum being a sum of all the 1 or more family members of a 1 st multiplication value of the 1 st value and a 1 st infection risk coefficient corresponding to the 1 st value, and the 2 nd sum being a sum of all the 1 or more family members of a 2 nd multiplication value of the 2 nd value and a 2 nd infection risk coefficient corresponding to the 2 nd value,
the 2 nd infection risk coefficient is a coefficient obtained by digitizing the infection risk with the organization to which the family member belongs, for each of the 1 or more family members.
3. The method for evaluating infection risk according to claim 2,
the 2 nd infection risk value is a value obtained by calculating a sum or an average of sums in the group of 1 st infection risk values calculated for the children constituting the group every predetermined time.
4. The method for evaluating infection risk according to claim 2 or 3,
the 1 st infection risk value is corrected so as to be increased in the case of having an increasing tendency, and is corrected so as to be decreased in the case of having a decreasing tendency.
5. The method for evaluating infection risk according to claim 2,
obtaining a voice recognition result of a voice recognition device installed in the organization,
the prevalence information includes a 3 rd value indicating prevalence of the infection, the 3 rd value being a value determined for each predetermined time using the voice recognition result for each of the 1 or more affiliated tissues,
the 2 nd value is generated using the 3 rd value.
6. The method for evaluating infection risk according to any one of claims 1 to 5,
the evaluation result in the 1 st evaluation is output to a manager terminal of the collective manager, and the evaluation result in the 2 nd evaluation is output to a guardian terminal of a guardian of the child.
7. The method for evaluating infection risk according to any one of claims 1 to 6,
the evaluation results in the 1 st evaluation comprise the temporal passage of the 1 st infection risk value,
the evaluation results in the 2 nd evaluation comprise the passage in time of the 2 nd infection risk value.
8. The method for evaluating infection risk according to claim 2,
in the suffering information, the 1 st value is obtained from a guardian terminal of a guardian of the child.
9. The method for evaluating infection risk according to any one of claims 1 to 8,
determining the child having the 1 st infection risk value greater than the 1 st reference value as a monitoring subject child,
detecting whether the monitoring target child returns the toy to the toy housing apparatus using a camera provided in the child facility,
when it is detected that the child to be monitored returns the toy, a sterilizing liquid is sprayed from a sterilizing device to the toy.
10. An infection risk evaluation system for evaluating the risk of infection of an infectious disease in a child facility, comprising:
an acquisition unit (1) that acquires information relating to the occurrence of infection in 1 or more family members of a child;
a 2 nd acquisition unit that acquires epidemic information on an epidemic situation of an infection in 1 or more affiliated tissues of the 1 or more family members;
a 1 st infection risk value calculation unit that calculates a 1 st infection risk value indicating a degree of infection risk that the child is infected with the infectious disease, based on the acquired 1 st infection risk coefficient obtained by digitizing the infection risk between the child and each of the 1 or more family members, the acquired prevalence information, and the acquired 1 st infection risk coefficient;
a 2 nd infection risk value calculation unit that calculates a 2 nd infection risk value indicating a degree of infection risk of the child infecting the infectious disease in the group of child facilities to which the child belongs, based on the 1 st infection risk value;
an evaluation unit that performs at least one of a 1 st evaluation and a 2 nd evaluation, the 1 st evaluation comparing the 1 st infection risk value with a predetermined 1 st reference value and evaluating the infection risk of the child being infected with the infection, the 2 nd evaluation comparing the 2 nd infection risk value with a predetermined 2 nd reference value and evaluating the infection risk of the child being infected with the infection in the group; and
and an output unit that outputs an evaluation result of at least one of the 1 st evaluation and the 2 nd evaluation.
11. An infection risk evaluation program for evaluating the infection risk of an infectious disease in a child facility, wherein a computer functions as a 1 st acquisition unit, a 2 nd acquisition unit, a 1 st infection risk value calculation unit, a 2 nd infection risk value calculation unit, an evaluation unit, and an output unit,
the 1 st acquisition unit acquires information on a condition of infection of 1 or more family members of a child,
the 2 nd acquisition unit acquires epidemic information on an epidemic situation of an infectious disease in 1 or more of the affiliated tissues of the 1 or more family members,
the 1 st infection risk value calculation unit calculates a 1 st infection risk value indicating a degree of infection risk that the child is infected with the infectious disease, based on the acquired 1 st infection risk coefficient obtained by digitizing the infection risk between the child and each of the 1 or more family members,
the 2 nd infection risk value calculation unit calculates a 2 nd infection risk value indicating a degree of infection risk of the child infecting the infection in the collective child facility to which the child belongs, based on the 1 st infection risk value,
the evaluation unit performs at least one of 1 st evaluation and 2 nd evaluation, the 1 st evaluation comparing the 1 st infection risk value with a predetermined 1 st reference value to evaluate the infection risk of the child being infected with the infection, the 2 nd evaluation comparing the 2 nd infection risk value with a predetermined 2 nd reference value to evaluate the infection risk of the child being infected with the infection in the group,
the output unit outputs an evaluation result of at least one of the 1 st evaluation and the 2 nd evaluation.
12. An infection risk evaluation method in an infection risk evaluation system for evaluating the infection risk of an infectious disease in a facility,
the computer of the infection risk assessment system is provided,
acquiring information on the occurrence of infection in each of 1 or more family members of a facility visitor,
acquiring prevalence information on prevalence of an infection in 1 or more organizations to which the 1 or more family members belong,
calculating a 1 st infection risk value indicating a degree of infection risk of the facility visitor with the infection disease based on the acquired information on the presence, the acquired information on the prevalence, and 1 or more 1 st infection risk coefficients obtained by quantifying the infection risk between the facility visitor and each of the 1 or more family members,
calculating a 2 nd infection risk value based on the 1 st infection risk value, the 2 nd infection risk value representing a degree of infection risk of the facility visitor to the infection in a collective of the facilities visited by the facility visitor,
performing at least one of an evaluation 1 and an evaluation 2, the evaluation 1 comparing the infection risk value 1 with a predetermined reference value 1 to evaluate the infection risk of the facility visitor having the infection, the evaluation 2 comparing the infection risk value 2 with a predetermined reference value 2 to evaluate the infection risk of the facility visitor having the infection in the collective,
and outputting the evaluation result of at least one of the 1 st evaluation and the 2 nd evaluation.
13. A method for evaluating the risk of infection,
comprising repeating the process n times by a computer while changing k from 1 to n, where k and n are natural numbers, and n is 2 or more,
the treatments include the 1 st treatment to the 6 th treatment,
in the 1 st process, the kth patient information is acquired,
in the 2 nd process, the kth popularity information is acquired,
in the 3 rd process, Ro (k) indicating a degree of possibility that the kth child is currently infected is calculated based on the kth acquiring information, the kth epidemic information, and a plurality of kth infection risk coefficients,
in the 4 th process, kth information based on a comparison between the ro (k) and a 1 st predetermined value is transmitted to a terminal of a person in charge of a class to which a plurality of children including the kth child belong, the plurality of children being 1 st to nth children,
in the 5 th process, an infection risk value is calculated, where (Ro (1) … … + Ro (k) … … + Ro (n) -Ro (k)/(n-1), and (Ro (1) … … + Ro (k) … … + Ro (n) -Ro (k)/(n-1) indicates the degree of possibility of infection of the kth child in the class,
transmitting (n + k) th information based on a comparison of the infection risk value and a 2 nd predetermined value to a terminal of a k-th person in the 6 th process,
the kth acquiring information indicates a plurality of infectious disease acquiring conditions of kth plurality of fellow persons living together with the kth child,
the kth plurality of co-occupiers includes the kth figure,
the kth epidemic information represents a kth plurality of epidemic conditions of infection in a kth plurality of buildings that the kth plurality of co-residents visit periodically,
a plurality of infectious disease epidemics in the kth plurality of residents and the kth plurality of buildings correspond one-to-one,
the kth infection risk factor represents a plurality of affinities of the kth child to the kth plurality of co-occupiers,
the kth plurality of siblings and the kth plurality of infection risk coefficients correspond one-to-one,
a nursery, kindergarten or elementary school has the class.
Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to techniques for assessing the risk of infection of an infectious disease in a pediatric facility.
Background
Specifically,
Disclosure of Invention
However, in
An infection risk evaluation method according to an aspect of the present disclosure is an infection risk evaluation method in an infection risk evaluation system for evaluating an infection risk of an infectious disease in a child facility,
the computer of the infection risk assessment system is provided,
acquiring information on the occurrence of infection in each of 1 or more family members of a child,
acquiring prevalence information on prevalence of an infection in 1 or more organizations to which the 1 or more family members belong,
calculating a 1 st infection risk value indicating a degree of infection risk of the child with the infection based on the suffering information, the prevalence information, and 1 or more 1 st infection risk coefficients obtained by quantifying the infection risk between the child and each of the 1 or more family members,
calculating a 2 nd infection risk value based on the 1 st infection risk value, the 2 nd infection risk value representing a degree of infection risk of the child infecting the infection in a collective of the child facilities to which the child belongs,
performing at least one of an 1 st evaluation and a 2 nd evaluation, said 1 st evaluation comparing said 1 st infection risk value with a predetermined 1 st reference value and evaluating the infection risk of said child being infected with said infection, said 2 nd evaluation comparing said 2 nd infection risk value with a predetermined 2 nd reference value and evaluating the infection risk of said child in said collective infection with said infection,
and outputting the evaluation result of at least one of the 1 st evaluation and the 2 nd evaluation.
The general or specific technical means may be implemented by a method, a system, an integrated circuit, a computer program, or a computer-readable recording medium, or may be implemented by any combination of an apparatus, a system, a method, an integrated circuit, a computer program, and a computer-readable recording medium. Examples of the computer-readable recording medium include nonvolatile recording media such as CD-ROM (Compact Disc-Read Only Memory).
According to the present disclosure, the risk of infection of children with infectious diseases in groups and the risk of infection of children with infectious diseases can be accurately grasped. Further advantages and effects in one aspect of the present disclosure are apparent from the description and the accompanying drawings. The advantages and/or effects are provided by the features described in the several embodiments, the description, and the drawings, respectively, but all of them need not necessarily be provided in order to obtain one or more of the same features.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a diagram showing an example of the overall configuration of an infection risk evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Fig. 2 is a block diagram showing an example of the configuration of the server shown in fig. 1.
Fig. 3 is a diagram showing an example of the data structure of the family information DB.
Fig. 4 is a diagram showing an example of a data structure of the family information DB.
Fig. 5 is a diagram showing an example of a data structure of the belonging suffering information DB.
Fig. 6 is a diagram showing an example of the data structure of the infection risk coefficient DB.
FIG. 7 is a diagram showing a table used for explaining specific examples of the 1 st infection risk value.
Fig. 8 is a sequence diagram showing an example of processing performed by the infection risk evaluation system of the present disclosure to acquire family risk information and related risk information.
Fig. 9 is a flowchart showing an example of processing of the server of the infection risk evaluating system according to the present disclosure.
Fig. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a data structure of region infection information.
Fig. 11 is a diagram showing a 1 st display screen displayed on the parent terminal.
Fig. 12 is a diagram showing an example of the 2 nd display screen displayed on the parent terminal.
Fig. 13 is a diagram showing an example of the 3 rd display screen displayed on the parent terminal.
Fig. 14 is a diagram showing an example of the 4 th display screen displayed on the parent terminal.
Fig. 15 is a diagram showing an enlarged view of the graph display section of fig. 12.
Fig. 16 is a diagram showing an example of the configuration of the infection risk evaluation system according to
Fig. 17 is a block diagram showing an example of the configuration of a server according to
FIG. 18 is a block diagram showing an example of the structure of the bacteria removing device.
Fig. 19 is a flowchart showing an example of processing of the server according to
Description of the reference symbols
10. 10A server
11. 61 communication device
12. 201, 302, 401, 501 processor
13 memory
20 guardian terminal
30 intelligent sound box
40 manager terminal
50 pick-up head
60 degerming device
121 the 1 st acquisition part
122 nd acquisition unit
123 st infection risk value calculation unit
124
125 evaluation part
126 output unit
127 determination unit for monitoring target person
128 return detection unit
129 bacteria elimination control part
131 family information DB
132 family suffering information DB
133 belonging to the suffering information DB
134 infection risk coefficient DB
150 toy receiving apparatus
AF family Risk values
Risk value to which AM belongs
Detailed Description
(procedure to obtain a solution of the present disclosure)
In child facilities such as a kindergarten, a nursery house, an nursing home, and a primary school, when an infectious disease such as Norovirus (Norovirus) and influenza is prevalent, the effect of the infectious disease is spread to most children, and therefore, it is necessary to prevent the prevalence of the infectious disease in the future and to minimize the prevalence of the infectious disease even if the infectious disease is already prevalent. Therefore, it is necessary to accurately grasp the infection risk of the child infecting infection in the class and the like to which the child belongs and notify the guardian, and accurately grasp the infection risk of the child infecting infection and notify the manager of the child facility.
Here, infection of a child by an infectious disease depends not only on the physical condition of the child and the physical condition of family members of the child, but also on the prevalence of the infectious disease in organizations (for example, companies, schools, kindergartens, nursing homes, and the like) to which the family members belong. In addition, it is not sufficient to accurately grasp the infection risk in the group to which children belong, and it is also necessary to evaluate the infection risk of each child individually, and to evaluate the infection risk of each child comprehensively.
However, in the above-mentioned
Further, in
The present disclosure provides an infection risk evaluation method and the like that can accurately grasp the risk of infection of children in a collective and the risk of infection of children infected with an infectious disease.
One aspect of the present disclosure is an infection risk evaluation method in an infection risk evaluation system for evaluating an infection risk of an infection in a child facility,
the computer of the infection risk assessment system is provided,
acquiring information on the occurrence of infection in each of 1 or more family members of a child,
acquiring prevalence information on prevalence of an infection in 1 or more organizations to which the 1 or more family members belong,
calculating a 1 st infection risk value indicating a degree of infection risk of the child with the infection based on the suffering information, the prevalence information, and 1 or more 1 st infection risk coefficients obtained by quantifying the infection risk between the child and each of the 1 or more family members,
calculating a 2 nd infection risk value based on the 1 st infection risk value, the 2 nd infection risk value representing a degree of infection risk of the child infecting the infection in a collective of the child facilities to which the child belongs,
performing at least one of an 1 st evaluation and a 2 nd evaluation, said 1 st evaluation comparing said 1 st infection risk value with a predetermined 1 st reference value and evaluating the infection risk of said child being infected with said infection, said 2 nd evaluation comparing said 2 nd infection risk value with a predetermined 2 nd reference value and evaluating the infection risk of said child in said collective infection with said infection,
and outputting the evaluation result of at least one of the 1 st evaluation and the 2 nd evaluation.
According to this configuration, the 1 st infection risk value is calculated using not only the information on the occurrence of family members of the child, but also the prevalence information of infection of each family member and the 1 st infection risk coefficient between the child and each family member. Therefore, the risk of infection of the child with the infectious disease can be accurately grasped.
In addition, a 2 nd infection risk value is calculated using the 1 st infection risk value. Therefore, the risk of infection of a child with an infectious disease in a group of child facilities to which the child belongs can be accurately grasped.
Further, at least one of the 1 st evaluation for comparing the 1 st infection risk value with the 1 st threshold value and the 2 nd evaluation for comparing the 2 nd infection risk value with the 2 nd threshold value is performed, and the evaluation result is outputted. When the evaluation result of the 1 st evaluation is output, the manager who sees the collective evaluation result of the 1 st evaluation can suppress the prevalence of infectious diseases in the collective by taking measures to avoid the child at high risk of infection coming into close contact with other children, or to stop the child at high risk of infection from entering the garden, for example.
In addition, when the evaluation result of the 2 nd evaluation is output, the guardian who sees the evaluation result of the 2 nd evaluation can prevent the child from suffering from the infectious disease by, for example, stopping the child from entering the garden.
In the above aspect, the infection information may be associated with a 1 st value indicating that the infection is caused and a 2 nd value indicating that the infection is prevailing in the belonging tissue for each predetermined time period for each of the 1 or more family members,
the 1 st infection risk value is calculated by adding, per the predetermined time, a 1 st sum and a 2 nd sum, the 1 st sum being a sum of all the 1 or more family members of a 1 st multiplication value of the 1 st value and a 1 st infection risk coefficient corresponding to the 1 st value, and the 2 nd sum being a sum of all the 1 or more family members of a 2 nd multiplication value of the 2 nd value and a 2 nd infection risk coefficient corresponding to the 2 nd value,
the 2 nd infection risk coefficient is a coefficient obtained by digitizing the infection risk with the organization to which the family member belongs, for each of the 1 or more family members.
According to this configuration, the 1 st total sum of all the family members of the 1 st multiplication value calculated by the following operation is calculated for each predetermined time: the 1 st multiplication value is the 1 st value indicating that each family member suffered from an infectious disease x the 1 st infection risk coefficient of each family member. Further, a 2 nd total of all the family members of the 2 nd multiplication value calculated by: the 2 nd multiplication value ═ represents the 2 nd value of the infection that is currently prevailing in the organization to which each family member belongs x the 2 nd infection risk coefficient for each family member. Then, a value obtained by adding the 1 st sum and the 2 nd sum at predetermined time intervals is calculated as a 1 st infection risk value. Therefore, the 1 st infection risk value can be accurately calculated in units of a predetermined time.
In the above-described aspect, the 2 nd infection risk value may be a value obtained by calculating a sum or an average of sums in the group of 1 st infection risk values calculated for the children constituting the group every predetermined time period.
According to this configuration, the 2 nd infection risk value can be accurately calculated in units of a predetermined time.
In the above-described aspect, the 1 st infection risk value may be corrected so as to be increased when the value has a tendency to increase, and may be corrected so as to be decreased when the value has a tendency to decrease.
According to this configuration, the 1 st infection risk value is increased when the 1 st infection risk value calculated for each predetermined time tends to increase and the infection is in an enlarged situation, and the 1 st infection risk value is decreased when the 1 st infection risk value calculated for each predetermined time tends to decrease and the infection is in a reduced situation. As a result, the 1 st infection risk value can be calculated taking into consideration the situation where the infection is in an enlarged state and the situation where the infection is in a reduced state.
In the above-described aspect, the speech recognition result of the speech recognition apparatus provided in the belonging organization may be acquired,
the prevalence information includes a 3 rd value indicating prevalence of the infection, the 3 rd value being a value determined for each predetermined time using the voice recognition result for each of the 1 or more affiliated tissues,
the 2 nd value is generated using the 3 rd value.
According to this configuration, the 3 rd value indicating the prevalence of an infectious disease in the organization to which the infectious disease belongs is generated using the voice recognition result of the voice recognition device such as a smart speaker, and is reflected in the prevalence information and the suffering information.
In the above-described aspect, the evaluation result in the 1 st evaluation may be output to a manager terminal of the collective manager, and the evaluation result in the 2 nd evaluation may be output to a guardian terminal of a guardian of the child.
According to this configuration, it is possible to notify the collective manager of a child who is likely to be infected with an infectious disease, and to allow the collective manager to take necessary measures for the child in order to prevent the prevalence of an infectious disease in the collective. In addition, the monitoring person can be informed of the collective infection risk, and judgment materials for judging whether to bring the child into the garden can be prompted.
In the above aspect, the evaluation result in the 1 st evaluation may include a temporal transition of the 1 st infection risk value,
the evaluation results in the 2 nd evaluation comprise the passage in time of the 2 nd infection risk value.
According to this configuration, since the temporal transition of the 1 st infection risk value or the temporal transition of the 2 nd infection risk value is output, it is possible to indicate whether the infection disease is in an expansion situation or a contraction situation.
In the above-described aspect, in the suffering information, the 1 st value may be obtained from a guardian terminal of a guardian of the child.
According to this configuration, the 1 st value indicating whether or not each of the family members has an infectious disease is input through the terminal device of the guardian.
In the above aspect, the child having the 1 st infection risk value larger than the 1 st reference value may be determined as a child to be monitored,
detecting whether the monitoring target child returns the toy to the toy housing apparatus using a camera provided in the child facility,
when it is detected that the child to be monitored returns the toy, a sterilizing liquid is sprayed from a sterilizing device to the toy.
According to this configuration, when the toy played by the child to be monitored is returned to the toy storage device, the toy is sterilized, and therefore, contact infection can be prevented.
The present disclosure may also be implemented as a computer program that causes a computer to execute the characteristic steps included in such a method. It is to be understood that such a computer program may be distributed via a non-transitory recording medium readable by a computer such as a CD-ROM or a communication network such as the internet.
The embodiments described below are all specific examples of the present disclosure. The numerical values, shapes, constituent elements, steps, and the order of the steps shown in the following embodiments are examples, and are not intended to limit the present disclosure. Among the components of the following embodiments, those not recited in the independent claims indicating the highest concept will be described as arbitrary components. In all the embodiments, the contents may be combined.
(embodiment mode 1)
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present disclosure will be described with reference to the drawings. Fig. 1 is a diagram showing an example of the overall configuration of an infection risk evaluation system according to
The infection refers to a disease caused by invasion and reproduction of pathogens into an organism, such as influenza, red dysentery, malaria, norovirus and the like.
The child facility refers to a facility to which a subject child belongs, and includes child facilities such as a kindergarten, an nursing home, a primary school, and a nursery.
The child refers to a person who goes to or goes to a child facility, for example, a child who goes to a kindergarten, a nursing home, or the like, and a child of a primary school or a secondary school, belonging to the child.
The infection risk evaluation system includes a
The
The parent terminal 20 is configured by, for example, a personal computer installed in the family of the target child to be evaluated of the risk of infection or a mobile terminal owned by the parent of the target child, and transmits family presence information (an example of presence information) to the
In fig. 1, only one guardian terminal 20 is shown for convenience of explanation, but this is an example, and a plurality of guardian terminals 20 corresponding to a plurality of households may exist.
The smart speaker 30 is installed in an organization to which the family member of the target child belongs, and is used by the
Here, the smart speaker 30 has been described as performing voice recognition using the processor 302, but the present disclosure is not limited thereto, and an external server may perform voice recognition. In this case, the smart speaker 30 may transmit the voice signal collected by the microphone 301 to the external server, receive the voice recognition result of the external server, and transmit the result to the
Here, the affiliated organization to which the father or mother of the subject child belongs, for example, belongs. In addition, the affiliated organization includes, for example, a brother, a sister, a school to which the sister belongs, a kindergarten, and an child care facility, which are family members of the subject child. In the case where the organization is a workplace, the smart sound box 30 is installed, for example, in an activity room of the workplace. In addition, when the organization is a school, the smart sound box 30 is installed in, for example, a classroom of the school.
In fig. 1, for convenience of explanation, one smart sound box 30 is illustrated, but this is an example, and the smart sound boxes 30 are respectively installed in organizations such as a school to which brother belongs, a workplace to which dad belongs, and a school to which brother belongs. In addition, when a plurality of families participate, the smart sound box 30 is also provided to an organization to which family members of each family belong.
The manager terminal 40 is configured by, for example, a personal computer provided in a child facility to which the target child belongs, or a mobile terminal held by a manager (e.g., a master teacher) of a class to which the target child belongs. Specifically, the manager terminal 40 includes a processor 401 that manages the overall control of the manager terminal 40, a display unit 402 that displays various images under the control of the processor 401, an operation unit 403 that receives an operation from the manager, and a communication unit 404 that transmits various data under the control of the processor 401.
The
The
The infection information server 70 is a server managed by, for example, a hospital or a doctor's office, and provides regional infection information indicating the distribution of infected persons in each region when an infectious disease is currently ongoing.
Fig. 2 is a block diagram showing an example of the configuration of the
The 1
The 2
For example, when a voice recognition result indicating the prevalence of an infection such as influenza is acquired from the smart speaker 30 installed in the school in brother, the 2
In this way, when the voice recognition result is transmitted from the smart speaker 30, the 2
The 1 st infection risk
Here, the 1 st infection risk value is a numerical value indicating the degree of infection risk that a subject child is infected with an infectious disease. The 1 st infection risk coefficient is a coefficient obtained by quantifying the risk of infection between the subject child and each family member. Details of the calculation of the 1 st infection risk value will be described later.
The 2 nd infection risk
The
The
In the following, the
The
The
Fig. 3 is a diagram showing an example of the data structure of the
The family information DB131 assigns a family information table to each of the subject child and the family member. In the example of fig. 3, the family information DB131 is configured by a family information table 131A of "small Δ" as the target child, and 4 family information tables 131B, 131C, 131D, and 131E corresponding to "dad", "mom", "brother", and "brother" as family members of the target child, respectively.
The family information table 131A has fields of "name", "love", "age", "class", "face", and "family of the same living. The name field stores the name of the subject child. The title of the subject child is stored in the title field. The age field stores the age of the subject child. In the "face" field, image data of the face of the subject child is stored. The "family" field stores family members of the same family of the subject child. Here, "dad", "mom", "brother", and "brother" are stored.
The family information tables 131B to 131E have fields of "relationship", "name", "love", "age", and "belonging", respectively. In the "relationship" field, the relationship with respect to the subject child is stored. The "name", "love", "age" are the same as those in the family information table 131A. The "belonging" field stores the organization to which the family member belongs. Here, the tissues of "dad", "mom", "brother" and "brother" are "Songzhi electric", "professional woman", "A scholar" and "B nursing home", respectively.
Fig. 4 is a diagram showing an example of the data structure of the family
The family occurrence information DB132 is a table created using the family occurrence information acquired by the 1
The family suffering information DB132 has fields of "suffering from" and "belonging" with respect to family members, respectively. Information indicating whether or not the family member has an infectious disease is stored in the "suffering" field. Here, "1" is stored when the patient is suffering from the disease, and "0" is stored when the patient is not suffering from the disease. The "1" stored in the "suffering" field is an example of the 1 st value.
The "belonging" field stores information indicating the prevalence of infection in the organization to which the family member belongs. Here, "1" is stored when the user is popular, and "0" is stored when the user is not popular. A "1" stored in the "home" field is an example of a 2 nd value.
For example, the "suffering" field of "dad" on this day (1/10/2018) stores "1", and the "belonging" field stores "0". Thus, it is shown that: "dad" suffered from an infection, but no epidemic was seen at dad's workplace.
In the example of fig. 4, on this day, family acquisition information indicating that dad and brother are acquired and mom and brother are not acquired is transmitted from the guardian terminal 20, and therefore, the 1
In fig. 4, "1" and "0" written in "belong" reflect the contents of the belonging suffering information DB133 shown in fig. 5. For example, "1" is written in the "belonging" field of brother on the day of fig. 4, because "1" indicating the prevalence of infectious disease is registered in the field indicating "a scholar" to which brother belongs on the day of belonging suffering information. Note that writing of "1" and "0" in the "belonging" field in the family presence information DB132 is performed by the 1
Fig. 5 is a diagram showing an example of the data structure of the belonging
For example, the "a scholar" field on this day stores "1". This is because the speech recognition result transmitted from the smart speaker 30 in the university a on the day includes speech that is intended for the epidemic infection. Therefore, the 2
In addition, "0" is stored in the "songzhi electric" field on this day. This is because the speech recognition result transmitted from the songzi smart speaker 30 on the day does not include a speech indicating the prevalence of an infection. Therefore, the 2
The family occurrence information DB132 shown in fig. 4 and the belonging occurrence information DB133 shown in fig. 5 may be created for each type of infectious disease, or may be created regardless of the type of infectious disease.
Fig. 6 is a diagram showing an example of the data structure of the infection
Here, since the contact with the target child is made in the order of "brother", "mom", "brother", "dad", the 1 st infection risk coefficient of each family member takes a value that increases in this order. The 1 st infection risk coefficient RF of the brother is determined as follows, considering that the closer the age and the closer the contact with the child to be treated. That is, when the age difference between the child and the brother is 1 or less, the 1 st infection risk coefficient RF of the brother or the brother is determined to be "1". On the other hand, in the case where the age difference of the child — brother or brother is larger than 1, the 1 st infection risk coefficient RF of brother or brother is determined to be "0.5".
The 2 nd infection risk coefficient RM also has the 2 nd infection risk coefficient and the 2 nd infection risk coefficient of each family member in the same manner as the 1 st infection risk coefficient RF. The integrated 2 nd infection risk coefficient is a value for determining the weight of the 2 nd infection risk coefficient RM, and here, "0.3" is adopted. Here, the reason why the overall 2 nd infection risk coefficient is set to a value smaller than the overall 1 st infection risk coefficient is that the presence or absence of infection of the family member affects the infectious infection more greatly than the prevalence of the infectious infection in the tissue to which the family member belongs, in the target child.
The 2 nd infection risk coefficient of each family member represents the 2 nd infection risk coefficient RM between the subject child and the family member, and takes a value in the range of "0" to "1". In addition, for the 2 nd infection risk coefficient of each family member, the value of the 2 nd infection risk coefficient of brother and the value of the 2 nd infection risk coefficient of brother take larger values than the value of the 2 nd infection risk coefficient of dad and the value of the 2 nd infection risk coefficient of mom under the consideration that children are more susceptible to secondary infection than adults.
< 1 st infection risk value >
Next, a specific example of calculating the 1 st infection risk value by the 1 st infection risk
Here, the 1 st infection risk value on the present day is represented by Ro, the 1 st infection risk value on the previous day is represented by R-1, the 1 st infection risk value on 2 days is represented by R-2, … …, and the 1 st infection risk value on n days is represented by R-n.
The 1 st infection risk value Ro is represented by the following formula (1).
Ro ═ family risk value AF + associated risk value AM (1)
The family risk value AF is represented by formula (2).
AF=1·ΣRF(c)·DF(c) (2)
Here, c is an index indicating the relationship of each of 1 or more family members with respect to the subject child, and for example, RF (c) · DF (c) for dad of the child is denoted as RF (dad) · DF (dad), and RF (c) · DF (c) for brother of the child is denoted as RF (brother) · DF (brother). The expression Σ rf (c) df (c) means: the RF (c) and DF (c) are obtained for 1 or more family members, and the RF (c) and DF (c) of each family member obtained for the whole family member are added. The first "1" on the right side of formula (2) represents the overall 1 st infection risk factor. Equation (2) is an example of the 1 st sum of the 1 st total of all the family members of the 1 st multiplication value of the 1 st infection risk coefficient corresponding to the 1 st value and the 1 st value.
The associated risk value AM is represented by formula (3).
AM=0.3·ΣRM(c)·DM(c) (3)
The first "0.3" on the right side of formula (3) represents the overall 2 nd infection risk factor. Equation (3) is an example of the 2 nd sum of the 2 nd membership of the family member, which is the 2 nd multiplication value of the 2 nd infection risk coefficient corresponding to the 2 nd value.
In the example of fig. 7, the formula (2) is represented by the following formula (4).
AF is 1 · (RF (dad) · DF (dad) + RF (mom) · DF (mom) + RF (brother) · DF (brother)) (4)
Therefore, when the values in fig. 6 and 7 are substituted into equation (4), the family risk value AF is calculated as follows.
AF=1×(0.3·1+0.8·0+0.5·0+1·1)=1.3
In the example of fig. 7, the formula (3) is represented by the following formula (5).
AM ═ 0.3 · (RM (dad) · DM (dad) + RM (mom) · DM (mom) + RM (brother) · DM (brother)) (5)
Therefore, when the values in fig. 6 and 7 are substituted into equation (5), the associated risk value AM is calculated as follows.
AM=0.3·(0.1·0+0.1·0+0.5·1+1·1)=0.45
Therefore, the 1 st infection risk value Ro was calculated to be 1.3+0.45 to 1.75.
In this way, the 1 st infection risk
The 1 st infection risk
< 2 nd infection risk value >
Next, a specific example of calculating the 2 nd infection risk value by the 2 nd infection risk
The 2 nd infection risk
Specifically, the 2 nd infection risk value is calculated by the following formula (6).
Here, ro (k) represents the 1 st infection risk value on the day of a child k belonging to the subject class. Additionally, Σ ro (k) means that a plurality of 1 st infection risk values for a plurality of children belonging to the subject class are added. A plurality of children correspond one-to-one with a plurality of 1 st infection risk values.
Alternatively, the 2 nd infection risk value can be calculated by the following formula (7).
Here, N is the number of children in the subject class.
Further, if a class other than the target class participates, the 2 nd infection risk
Thus, the 2 nd infection risk value of each class is calculated every 1 day and is continuously stored in the
When the infection risks between shifts are compared, the 2 nd infection risk value may be calculated using the formula (7), i.e., the average value.
< modification of the 1 st infection risk value >
Next, the 1 st infection risk
Specifically, the 1 st infection risk value Ro is corrected as shown in the formula (8) when the corrected 1 st infection risk value is Rop.
When Ro- (R-1) ≥ 0, Rop ═ Ro +1
In the case where Ro- (R-1) < 0, Rop ═ Ro-0.2 (8)
That is, the 1 st infection risk value Ro is added with 1 when the present day is increased and subtracted with 0.2 when the present day is decreased.
Here, although a scheme of adding a fixed value "1" and subtracting a fixed value "0.2" is shown, this is an example, and a value other than "1" or "0.2" may be adopted as the fixed value.
In addition, when the 1 st infection risk value Ro can be expressed by the function f (x), it can be corrected by the following formula (9).
In the case where f' (0) ≧ 0, Rop ═ Ro +1
In the case where f' (0) < 0, Rop ═ Ro-0.2 (9)
Since x is an argument for determining a day and x is 0 indicates the day, f (0) is Ro.
By correcting the 1 st infection risk value in this manner, an appropriate 1 st infection risk value can be calculated in consideration of the situation where the infection is in an enlarged state and the situation where the infection is in a reduced state.
The 2 nd infection risk value may be calculated using the 1 st infection risk value after correction.
In this case, the 2 nd infection risk value is represented by the following formula (10) obtained by replacing ro (k) of formula (6) with rop (k) or formula (11) obtained by replacing ro (k) of formula (7) with rop (k).
< treatment >
Next, the processing of the infection risk evaluation system of the present disclosure will be described. Fig. 8 is a sequence diagram showing an example of processing performed by the infection risk evaluation system of the present disclosure to acquire family risk information and related risk information.
The smart sound box 30 transmits the voice recognition result to the
By repeating the above processing, the belonging information DB133 stores the belonging information.
Upon receiving input of information indicating whether or not a part or all of family members have an infectious disease and information indicating a disease name of the infectious disease, the parent terminal 20 generates family disease information including the information and transmits the family disease information to the server 10 (S11).
In the
The above processing is repeated every predetermined time (here, every 1 day), and the family development information is stored in the family
Fig. 9 is a flowchart showing an example of the processing of the
The region infection information is a table in which regions are set on the horizontal axis and periods are set on the vertical axis, and the number of patients with infectious diseases in each region is represented every 1 cycle. Regional infection information is information that a physician reports the total number of patients diagnosed with an infectious disease in a hospital in each region. Here, one region shown on the horizontal axis of fig. 10 is set in units of, for example, a city, a street, or a village. In fig. 10, a home in which the target child lives, a region including at least child facilities, and a plurality of regions adjacent to the region are set on the horizontal axis. The regional infection information may be periodically published throughout the year or periodically published at a time when the infectious disease is prevalent.
Refer back to fig. 9. In S102, the
For example, the
In S103, the 1 st infection risk
In S104, the 1 st infection risk
In S105, the 1 st infection risk
In S106, the 1 st infection risk
In S107, the 2 nd infection risk
In S108, the
In addition, there may be a plurality of the 1 st reference values. For example, when two 1 st reference values are TH1 and TH2 (> TH1), the 1 st evaluation result of "high" may be used when the 1 st infection risk value is larger than TH2, the 1 st evaluation result of "medium" may be used when the 1 st infection risk value is in the range of TH1 to TH2, and the 1 st evaluation result of "low" may be used when the 1 st infection risk value is smaller than
In S109, the
In S110, the
The 2 nd reference value may be a plurality of values as in the 1 st reference value. In this case, the 2 nd evaluation result is 3 or more levels of evaluation results such as "high", "medium", and "low" as in the 1 st evaluation result. For example, when the 2 nd reference value is TH3 or TH4 (> TH3), the value of TH3 may be 0.3, and the value of TH4 may be 0.7, for example.
In S111, the
< display frame >
Fig. 11 is a diagram showing an example of the 1 st display screen G1 displayed on the parent terminal 20. The 1 st display screen G1 is a screen on which a notification from a child facility to which the subject child belongs is displayed. Here, the 1 st display screen G1 displays a list of schedules of target children on the current day in the child facility. A health button B1 indicating health is displayed on the bottom of the 1 st display screen G1. When the guardian inputs an operation (for example, tapping) to select the health button B1 and the operation unit 203 receives the operation, the processor 201 displays a 2 nd display screen G2 shown in fig. 12 on the display unit 202.
Fig. 12 is a diagram showing an example of the 2 nd display screen G2 displayed on the parent terminal 20. The 2 nd display screen G2 includes a graph display section R21 in which the health status of the dandelion group to which the subject child belongs is displayed in a graph. In the graph display field R21, a graph showing the time transition of the 2 nd infection risk value with the 2 nd infection risk value set on the vertical axis and the day set on the horizontal axis is displayed. In this graph, the 2 nd evaluation result becomes "high" on this day, and therefore, a message to be noticed is displayed.
A suggestion display column R22 is displayed on the lower side of the graph display column R21. The advice display R22 shows the in-home precautions for the infectious disease, such as "please wash hands, rinse mouth". In addition, a message M1 of "do there are sick persons in the family" is displayed in the suggestion display column R22. When the guardian inputs the operation of the selection message M1 and the operation unit 203 receives the operation, the processor 201 displays the 3 rd display screen G3 shown in fig. 13 on the display unit 202.
Fig. 13 is a diagram showing an example of the 3 rd display screen G3 displayed on the parent terminal 20. The 3 rd display screen G3 is a screen for inputting whether or not each of the family members is suffering from an infectious disease.
The 3 rd display screen G3 includes a main screen R1 for displaying a list of the relationships between the family members as a tree, and a patient name input button R2 displayed below the main screen R1. On the home screen R1, icons R3 indicating the individual family members are displayed. Here, 4 icons R3 corresponding to dad, mom, brother, and brother except for the subject child are displayed.
The disease name input button R2 is a button for inputting the disease name of a family member, and here, disease name input buttons R2 corresponding to disease names such as "flu", "norovirus", and "cold" are displayed.
When the guardian inputs an operation for selecting a desired family member and the operation is received through the operation unit 203, the processor 201 moves the cursor R4 to the icon R3 of the family member. When the patient name input button R2 is selected, the operation unit 203 receives the patient name of the selected family member. The processor 201 associates the received name of the disease with the identifier of the selected family member and transmits the name of the disease to the
Refer back to fig. 12. A message M2 of "link to hospital information" is also displayed in the advice display column R22. When the operation of selecting the "link" portion of the message M2 is input by the guardian and the operation unit 203 receives the operation, the processor 201 displays a 4 th display screen G4 shown in fig. 14.
Fig. 14 is a diagram showing an example of the 4 th display screen G4 displayed on the parent terminal 20. The 4 th display screen G4 is a screen for displaying a list of hospitals in the vicinity of the child to be displayed. The 4 th display screen G4 includes a list display section R41 for displaying a list of hospitals in the vicinity. The identification number, hospital name, URL, and congestion status of the nearby hospital are displayed in the list display section R41 in association with each other.
Since the congestion status is displayed in the list display section R41, the guardian can easily determine which hospital should be selected. When the guardian inputs an operation to select a site of the URL in the list display section R41 and the operation is received by the operation unit 203, the processor 201 displays a home page of the corresponding hospital on the display unit 202.
An access map display field R42 is displayed below the list display field R41, and an access map display field R42 shows access maps to the hospitals displayed in a list in the list display field R41. In the access map display section R42, the identification numbers of the hospitals are displayed at the positions of the hospitals whose list is displayed in the list display section R41. Therefore, the guardian can easily recognize the position of each hospital whose list is displayed in the list display section R41.
Fig. 15 is a diagram showing the graph display field R21 of fig. 12 in an enlarged manner. As shown in fig. 15, the graph display field R21 has the 2 nd infection risk value set on the vertical axis, and a graph gr1 showing the time lapse of the 2 nd infection risk value is shown. On the horizontal axis, 0 indicates the current day and-1 indicates the previous day. Here, a graph gr1 of-6 to 0 is shown, showing the time course of the 2 nd infection risk value from 6 days ago to the present day.
Since the graph gr1 shows the time course of the 2 nd infection risk value from several days ago to the present day, the guardian can confirm whether the infection is in an enlarged situation or a reduced situation in the subject class. Therefore, the guardian can easily determine whether the subject child should be present or absent on the present day. In the example of fig. 15, the increase tends to occur from 6 to 2 days ago, but since the change is made from 2 days ago to the decrease until the present day, it is found that the present day is in a decrease situation.
Here, the 2 nd infection risk value from 6 days ago is shown, but this is an example, and the 2 nd infection risk value from a day before 7 days or from a day after 5 days may be shown.
In addition, the 2 nd infection risk value is shown in fig. 15, but the 1 st infection risk value may also be shown. In addition, the graph gr1 shown in fig. 15 can also be displayed on the guardian terminal 20 and the manager terminal 40. In this case, the manager terminal 40 may display at least one of the graph gr1 indicating the 1 st infection risk value and the graph gr1 indicating the 2 nd infection risk value.
As described above, according to
In addition, the 1 st infection risk value is used to calculate the 2 nd infection risk value. Therefore, the risk of infection of the child with an infectious disease in the class of the subject to which the child belongs can be accurately grasped.
Further, since the 1 st evaluation result and the 2 nd evaluation result are inputted, it is found that the administrator of the target class of the 1 st evaluation result can suppress the prevalence of infection in the target class by taking measures such as avoiding the child at a high infection risk from coming into close contact with other children or stopping the child at a high infection risk from entering the park.
In addition, the guardian who sees the evaluation result of
The 2 nd infection risk value may be determined for each child as follows.
The number of children in the class is n, the 1 st infection risk value of the 1 st child is Ro (1), … …, the 1 st infection risk value of the k child is Ro (k), … …, the 1 st infection risk value of the nth child is Ro (n), the 2 nd infection risk value of the 1 st child is (Ro (2) + … … + Ro (k) + … … + Ro (n)), … …, the 2 nd infection risk value of the k child is (Ro (1) + … … + Ro (k-2) + Ro (k-1) + Ro (k +2) + … … + Ro (n)), … …, and the 2 nd infection risk value of the nth child is (Ro (1) + … … + Ro (k) + … … + Ro (n-1)). The 2 nd infection risk value of the 1 st child may be (Ro (2) + … … + Ro (k) + + … … + Ro (n))/(n-1), … …, the 2 nd infection risk value of the k th child may be (Ro (1) + … … + Ro (k-2) + Ro (k-1) + Ro (k +2) + … … + Ro (n))/(n-1), … …, and the 2 nd infection risk value of the n th child may be (Ro (1) + … … + Ro (k) + + … … + Ro (n-1))/(n-1). Furthermore, (Ro (1) + … … + Ro (k-2) + Ro (k-1) + Ro (k +1) + Ro (k +2) + … … + Ro (n)), (Ro (1) … … + Ro (k) … … + Ro (n)) -Ro (k)) can also be expressed.
(embodiment mode 2)
- 上一篇:一种医用注射器针头装配设备
- 下一篇:电线导体、包覆电线、线束及电线导体的制造方法