阅读说明：本技术 一种儿童用药评价方法、系统及计算机设备 (Child medication evaluation method and system and computer equipment ) 是由 张伶俐 曾力楠 黄亮 杨春松 张川 陈哲 刘丹 李海龙 伯贞艳 李汶睿 林茂 于 2020-06-18 设计创作，主要内容包括：本发明涉及数据处理技术领域,具体涉及一种儿童用药评价方法、系统及计算机设备。包括构建儿童临床用药的合理用药评价模型；获取儿童临床用药数据,并从中提取出分类信息；根据分类信息将儿童临床用药数据对应导入合理用药评价模型进行数据比对,得出比对结果；将所有比对结果按照分类信息进行汇总,生成儿童临床用药的合理性评价结果。本发明可以有效提高对儿童临床用药的合理性评价效率,以便于实现对儿童临床用药的监测。(The invention relates to the technical field of data processing, in particular to a method and a system for evaluating drug use of children and computer equipment. Constructing a reasonable medication evaluation model of clinical medication of children; acquiring clinical medication data of children, and extracting classification information from the clinical medication data; according to the classification information, the children clinical medication data are correspondingly imported into a reasonable medication evaluation model for data comparison to obtain a comparison result; and summarizing all comparison results according to classification information to generate a rationality evaluation result of the clinical medication of the children. The invention can effectively improve the rationality evaluation efficiency of the clinical medication of children, so as to conveniently monitor the clinical medication of children.)

1. A method for evaluating medication for children, comprising:

constructing a reasonable medication evaluation model of clinical medication of children;

acquiring clinical medication data of children, and extracting classification information from the clinical medication data;

according to the classification information, the children clinical medication data are correspondingly imported into a reasonable medication evaluation model for data comparison to obtain a comparison result;

and summarizing all comparison results according to classification information to generate a rationality evaluation result of the clinical medication of the children.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of constructing a rational medication evaluation model of clinical medication for children comprises:

acquiring existing child medication index data;

extracting key information from existing child medication index data, wherein the key information comprises child age segmentation information, disease burden information, drug metabolism information and medication characteristic information;

and establishing a reasonable medication evaluation index system for the children according to the key information, and generating a reasonable medication evaluation model according to the reasonable medication evaluation index system for the children.

3. The method for evaluating the medication intake of children according to claim 2, further comprising:

adopting a Delphi expert consulting method to obtain correction data;

and correcting and optimizing the child rational medication evaluation index system by using the correction data.

4. The method for evaluating the medication of children as claimed in claim 1, wherein the process of obtaining the clinical medication data of children comprises:

acquiring a prescription list of clinical medication for children;

reading the contents of a prescription order for the children to take medicine, and acquiring the basic information of the children clinical medicine taking;

and classifying and sorting the basic information of the clinical medication of the children to obtain the clinical medication data of the children.

5. The method for evaluating the medication intake of children according to claim 1, further comprising:

determining the rationality evaluation result of the clinical medication of children in each hospital;

generating a corresponding evaluation report of the rationality of the clinical medication of the children according to the evaluation result of the rationality of the clinical medication of the children in each hospital;

and feeding back corresponding children clinical medication reasonability evaluation reports to hospitals.

6. The method as claimed in claim 5, wherein the classification information extracted from the clinical medication data of children includes drug selection information, medication course information, usage amount information and drug cost information.

7. A medication evaluation system for children, comprising:

the construction unit is used for constructing a reasonable medication evaluation model of clinical medication of children;

the acquisition unit is used for acquiring the clinical medication data of the children and extracting classification information from the clinical medication data;

the comparison unit is used for correspondingly importing the clinical medication data of the children into a reasonable medication evaluation model according to the classification information to carry out data comparison so as to obtain a comparison result;

and the summarizing unit is used for summarizing all comparison results according to the classification information to generate a rationality evaluation result of the clinical medication of the children.

8. The system for evaluating children's medication according to claim 7, wherein the obtaining unit is further configured to obtain existing child medication index data; when the construction unit is used for constructing a reasonable medication evaluation model of clinical medication of children, the construction unit is specifically used for:

extracting key information from existing child medication index data, wherein the key information comprises child age segmentation information, disease burden information, drug metabolism information and medication characteristic information;

and establishing a reasonable medication evaluation index system for the children according to the key information, and generating a reasonable medication evaluation model according to the reasonable medication evaluation index system for the children.

9. A computer device, comprising:

a memory to store instructions;

a processor for reading the instructions stored in the memory and executing the method according to the instructions as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6.

10. A computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon instructions which, when executed on a computer, cause the computer to perform the method of any one of claims 1-6.

Technical Field

The invention relates to the technical field of data processing, in particular to a method and a system for evaluating drug use of children and computer equipment.

Background

The rational drug administration evaluation refers to the evaluation of safety, effectiveness, economy and appropriateness of clinical drug administration.

Safety: rather than an absolute notion of whether a drug has adverse effects or side effects, the emphasis is placed on achieving maximum therapeutic efficacy with minimal risk of medication for the drug user.

Effectiveness: the expected purpose is achieved through the action of the medicine. The clinical effectiveness indexes comprise cure, significant efficiency, good conversion rate, inefficiency and the like.

The economic efficiency is as follows: the cost and the benefit of medication are considered, namely, the lowest possible medicine expense is exchanged for the largest possible treatment benefit, the limited medical resources are reasonably used, and the medicine expense burden of the patient is reduced.

Appropriateness: is an important index for realizing reasonable medication. Including appropriate indications, appropriate medication, appropriate administration (time, dosage, course, and route of administration), appropriate patient, appropriate information, and appropriate observations.

The method is particularly important for monitoring and evaluating the reasonable medication of special patient groups, especially for children patients, but currently, the reasonable medication evaluation monitoring of the clinical medication of the children patients is mainly evaluated manually by means of sophisticated experts, and a uniform evaluation system and system are not formed yet to efficiently and automatically complete the reasonable medication evaluation of the clinical medication of the children patients, so that the supervision of the medication of the children is realized.

Disclosure of Invention

Aiming at the defects in the prior art, the invention provides a method and a system for evaluating the medication of children and computer equipment, which can effectively improve the rationality evaluation efficiency of the clinical medication of children when applied, so as to conveniently monitor the clinical medication of children.

In a first aspect, the present invention provides a method for evaluating medication for children, comprising:

constructing a reasonable medication evaluation model of clinical medication of children;

acquiring clinical medication data of children, and extracting classification information from the clinical medication data;

according to the classification information, the children clinical medication data are correspondingly imported into a reasonable medication evaluation model for data comparison to obtain a comparison result;

and summarizing all comparison results according to classification information to generate a rationality evaluation result of the clinical medication of the children.

Based on the content of the invention, a rational medication evaluation model of the clinical medication of the children can be constructed, the clinical medication data of the children are imported into the rational medication evaluation model to obtain corresponding comparison results, and then the comparison results are summarized to obtain the rationality evaluation result of the clinical medication of the children. The evaluation method for the children drug use replaces the traditional manual evaluation method, so that the rationality evaluation efficiency of the children clinical drug use can be effectively improved, and the supervision of the children clinical drug use is conveniently realized.

In one possible design, the process of constructing a rational medication evaluation model for clinical medication of children comprises:

acquiring existing child medication index data;

extracting key information from existing child medication index data, wherein the key information comprises child age segmentation information, disease burden information, drug metabolism information and medication characteristic information;

and establishing a reasonable medication evaluation index system for the children according to the key information, and generating a reasonable medication evaluation model according to the reasonable medication evaluation index system for the children.

Based on the content of the invention, the existing children drug use index data can be collected to establish a children reasonable drug use evaluation index system, and then a reasonable drug use evaluation model is generated according to the children reasonable drug use evaluation index system, so that the evaluation range of the reasonable drug use evaluation model is more comprehensive.

In one possible design, the method further includes:

adopting a Delphi expert consulting method to obtain correction data;

and correcting and optimizing the child rational medication evaluation index system by using the correction data.

Based on the content of the invention, a Delphi expert consultation method is adopted to consult various qualified experts for the established children rational medication evaluation index system to perform statistical induction to obtain corresponding correction data, and then the correction data is used for performing correction optimization on the children rational medication evaluation index system, so that the evaluation result obtained by using a rational medication evaluation model is more accurate.

In one possible design, the process of obtaining clinical medication data for a child includes:

acquiring a prescription list of clinical medication for children;

reading the contents of a prescription order for the children to take medicine, and acquiring the basic information of the children clinical medicine taking;

and classifying and sorting the basic information of the clinical medication of the children to obtain the clinical medication data of the children.

Based on the invention, the clinical medication data of the children can be obtained by processing the prescription sheet of the clinical medication of the children, so that the method is very convenient and fast.

In one possible design, the method further includes:

determining the rationality evaluation result of the clinical medication of children in each hospital;

generating a corresponding evaluation report of the rationality of the clinical medication of the children according to the evaluation result of the rationality of the clinical medication of the children in each hospital;

and feeding back corresponding children clinical medication reasonability evaluation reports to hospitals.

Based on the invention, after the rationality evaluation results of the clinical medication of children in each hospital are obtained, the corresponding results are arranged into the rationality evaluation reports of the clinical medication of children and fed back to each hospital, so that the supervision of the clinical medication of children in each hospital is realized.

In one possible design, the classification information extracted from the clinical medication data of children includes drug selection information, medication course information, usage amount information, and drug cost information.

Based on the invention, the rationality evaluation of the clinical medication of children can be completed from multiple aspects, so that the evaluation result is more detailed and comprehensive.

In a second aspect, the present invention provides a medication evaluation system for children, comprising:

the construction unit is used for constructing a reasonable medication evaluation model of clinical medication of children;

the acquisition unit is used for acquiring the clinical medication data of the children and extracting classification information from the clinical medication data;

the comparison unit is used for correspondingly importing the clinical medication data of the children into a reasonable medication evaluation model according to the classification information to carry out data comparison so as to obtain a comparison result;

and the summarizing unit is used for summarizing all comparison results according to the classification information to generate a rationality evaluation result of the clinical medication of the children.

In one possible design, the obtaining unit is further configured to obtain existing child medication index data; when the construction unit is used for constructing a reasonable medication evaluation model of clinical medication of children, the construction unit is specifically used for:

extracting key information from existing child medication index data, wherein the key information comprises child age segmentation information, disease burden information, drug metabolism information and medication characteristic information;

and establishing a reasonable medication evaluation index system for the children according to the key information, and generating a reasonable medication evaluation model according to the reasonable medication evaluation index system for the children.

In one possible design, the system further includes:

the acquisition unit is used for acquiring correction data by adopting a Delphi expert consultation method;

and the correction unit is used for correcting and optimizing the child rational medication evaluation index system by using the correction data.

In one possible design, the system further includes:

the determination unit is used for determining the rationality evaluation result of the clinical medication of children in each hospital;

the generating unit is used for generating a corresponding evaluation report of the rationality of the clinical medication of the children according to the evaluation result of the rationality of the clinical medication of the children in each hospital;

and the feedback unit is used for feeding back the corresponding children clinical medication reasonability evaluation report to each hospital.

In a third aspect, the present invention provides a computer apparatus comprising:

a memory to store instructions;

a processor configured to read the instructions stored in the memory and execute the method of any of the first aspects according to the instructions.

In a fourth aspect, the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon instructions which, when run on a computer, cause the computer to perform the method of any of the first aspects.

In a fifth aspect, the present invention provides a computer program product comprising instructions which, when run on a computer, cause the computer to perform the method of any of the first aspects above.

Drawings

In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly described below, it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and for those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained according to the drawings without creative efforts.

FIG. 1 is a schematic flow diagram of the process of the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of the system of the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a computer device according to the present invention.

Detailed Description

The invention is further described with reference to the following figures and specific embodiments. It should be noted that the description of the embodiments is provided to help understanding of the present invention, but the present invention is not limited thereto. Specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are merely illustrative of example embodiments of the invention. This invention may, however, be embodied in many alternate forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein.

It should be understood that the terms first, second, etc. are used merely for distinguishing between descriptions and are not intended to indicate or imply relative importance. Although the terms first, second, etc. may be used herein to describe various elements, these elements should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one element from another. For example, a first element could be termed a second element, and, similarly, a second element could be termed a first element, without departing from the scope of example embodiments of the present invention.

It should be understood that the term "and/or" herein is merely one type of association relationship that describes an associated object, meaning that three relationships may exist, e.g., a and/or B may mean: a exists alone, B exists alone, and A and B exist at the same time, and the term "/and" is used herein to describe another association object relationship, which means that two relationships may exist, for example, A/and B, may mean: a alone, and both a and B alone, and further, the character "/" in this document generally means that the former and latter associated objects are in an "or" relationship.

It is to be understood that in the description of the present invention, the terms "upper", "vertical", "inside", "outside", and the like, refer to an orientation or positional relationship that is conventionally used for placing the product of the present invention, or that is conventionally understood by those skilled in the art, and are used merely for convenience in describing and simplifying the description, and do not indicate or imply that the device or element referred to must have a particular orientation, be constructed in a particular orientation, and be operated, and therefore should not be considered as limiting the present invention.

It will be understood that when an element is referred to as being "connected," "connected," or "coupled" to another element, it can be directly connected or coupled to the other element or intervening elements may be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being "directly adjacent" or "directly coupled" to another element, there are no intervening elements present. Other words used to describe the relationship between elements should be interpreted in a similar manner (e.g., "between … …" versus "directly between … …", "adjacent" versus "directly adjacent", etc.).

In the description of the present invention, it should also be noted that, unless otherwise explicitly specified or limited, the terms "disposed," "mounted," and "connected" are to be construed broadly, e.g., as meaning fixedly connected, detachably connected, or integrally connected; can be mechanically or electrically connected; they may be connected directly or indirectly through intervening media, or they may be interconnected between two elements. The specific meanings of the above terms in the present invention can be understood in specific cases to those skilled in the art.

The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of example embodiments of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms "a", "an" and "the" are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms "comprises," "comprising," "includes," and/or "including," when used herein, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, numbers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.

It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions/acts noted may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two figures shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the figures may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality/acts involved.

In the following description, specific details are provided to facilitate a thorough understanding of example embodiments. However, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the example embodiments may be practiced without these specific details. For example, systems may be shown in block diagrams in order not to obscure the examples in unnecessary detail. In other instances, well-known processes, structures and techniques may be shown without unnecessary detail in order to avoid obscuring example embodiments.