System and method for amplifying solar panel output

文档序号:1146459 发布日期:2020-09-11 浏览:5次 中文

阅读说明:本技术 放大太阳能面板输出的系统和方法 (System and method for amplifying solar panel output ) 是由 盖伊·克拉默 于 2018-12-21 设计创作,主要内容包括:提出了放大由太阳能面板产生的输出功率的方法和系统,该太阳能面板具有投射在其表面的一部分上的阴影。该系统和方法利用诸如双凸透镜状片材的折射-反射片和/或衍射光栅片来散射太阳光以照亮阴影,并且因此放大太阳能面板的输出功率。可替选地,当没有阴影投射在面板上时,所述片将附加的太阳光反射至面板上,增加面板的输出功率。可以使用所述片用于将太阳光折射、反射或既折射又反射至面板上。所述片可以与明亮面板或反射面板组合使用,以将附加的太阳光反射至所述面板上,以进一步放大输出。该系统和方法适用于各种类型的太阳能面板例如薄膜太阳能面板、微晶太阳能面板和多晶太阳能面板以及太阳能屋顶瓦片或其他太阳能辐射收集器。(Methods and systems are presented for amplifying output power generated by a solar panel having a shadow cast on a portion of its surface. The system and method utilize refractive-reflective sheets such as lenticular lens-like sheets and/or diffraction grating sheets to scatter sunlight to illuminate shadows and, thus, amplify the output power of the solar panel. Alternatively, when no shadow is cast on the panel, the sheet reflects additional sunlight onto the panel, increasing the output power of the panel. The sheet may be used for refracting, reflecting or both refracting and reflecting the sun onto the panel. The sheet may be used in combination with a bright panel or a reflective panel to reflect additional sunlight onto the panel to further amplify the output. The system and method are applicable to various types of solar panels such as thin film solar panels, microcrystalline solar panels, and polycrystalline solar panels, as well as solar roof tiles or other solar radiation collectors.)

1. A system for amplifying the output of a solar panel, comprising:

a solar panel having a light-receiving surface and a frame having an upper edge and a lower edge; and

a first refraction-reflection sheet having a first side comprising a plurality of refractive elements and a second side;

wherein the first refraction-reflection sheet is disposed in front of and proximate to the lower edge for reflecting sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel, thereby amplifying the output.

2. The system for amplifying the output power of a solar panel of claim 1, wherein said second side has a plurality of refractive elements.

3. The system for amplifying the output power of a solar panel of claim 1, wherein the first refraction-reflection sheet is one of a lenticular sheet, a linear prism sheet, an array prism sheet, and an array prism sheet including a plurality of spherical lenses.

4. The system for amplifying the output power of a solar panel of claim 3, wherein said first refractive-reflective sheet comprises a lenticular sheet, and wherein said plurality of refractive elements comprises a plurality of linear lenticular lenses.

5. The system for amplifying the output of a solar panel of claim 1, wherein the solar panel comprises one of a thin film solar panel, a polycrystalline solar panel, and a single crystal silicon solar cell.

6. The system for amplifying the output of a solar panel of claim 4, wherein said first refraction-reflection sheet is disposed such that said plurality of linear lenticular lenses extend in a direction perpendicular to said light-receiving surface of said solar panel.

7. The system for amplifying an output of a solar panel of claim 1, further comprising a second refraction-reflection sheet similar to said first refraction-reflection sheet and disposed adjacent to said first refraction-reflection sheet for reflecting additional sunlight onto said light receiving surface of said solar panel, thereby further amplifying said output.

8. The system for amplifying an output of a solar panel of claim 1, further comprising a second refraction-reflection sheet disposed on top of said first refraction-reflection sheet for reflecting additional sunlight onto said light receiving surface of said solar panel, thereby further amplifying said output.

9. The system for amplifying the output of a solar panel of claim 1, further comprising a second refraction-reflection sheet disposed substantially above said top edge of said solar panel similar to said first refraction-reflection sheet and oriented to reflect additional sunlight onto said light-receiving surface of said solar panel, thereby further amplifying said output.

10. The system for amplifying the output of a solar panel of claim 1 further comprising an upstanding refraction-reflector sheet positioned in front of said solar panel and oriented such that sunlight passes through said refraction-reflector sheet and is scattered under the action of said refracting elements to fall on a surface of said solar panel thereby illuminating shadows on said light receiving surface of said solar panel and further amplifying said output reduced by said shadows.

11. The system for amplifying the output of a solar panel of claim 10, wherein said upstanding refraction-reflective sheet is coated with an anti-reflective coating or comprises an anti-reflective film to allow more sunlight to pass through said upstanding refraction-reflective sheet.

12. The system for amplifying the output of a solar panel of claim 1, wherein said second side has a smooth surface coated with a colored or reflective medium for reflecting additional sunlight onto said light receiving surface of said solar panel, thereby further amplifying said output.

13. The system for amplifying an output of a solar panel of claim 1, further comprising a reflective panel disposed below said first refraction-reflection sheet for reflecting additional sunlight onto said light-receiving surface of said solar panel to further amplify said output while also preventing burning of said solar panel.

14. The system for amplifying an output of a solar panel of claim 12, further comprising a reflective panel disposed below said first refraction-reflection sheet for reflecting additional sunlight onto said light receiving surface of said solar panel to further amplify said output while also preventing burning of said solar panel.

15. The system for amplifying the output of a solar panel of claim 13 wherein said reflective panel comprises one of a panel and a mirror having a brightly colored surface.

16. The system for amplifying the output of a solar panel of claim 1 further comprising a first curved support surface disposed below said first refraction-reflection sheet.

17. The system for amplifying the output of a solar panel of claim 9, further comprising first and second curved support surfaces disposed below said first and second refraction-reflection sheets, respectively.

18. The system for amplifying the output of a solar panel of claim 13 further comprising a transparent curved support surface disposed above said reflective panel and supporting said first refraction-reflection sheet.

19. The system for amplifying the output of a solar panel of claim 18 further comprising right and left upright refractive-reflective sheets located on the right and left sides of said solar panel and oriented to reflect additional sunlight onto said light-receiving surface of said solar panel to further amplify said output.

20. The system for amplifying an output of a solar panel of claim 18 further comprising right and left upright reflective panels located on right and left sides of said solar panel and oriented for reflecting additional sunlight onto said light receiving surface of said solar panel to further amplify said output.

21. The system for amplifying an output of a solar panel of claim 20 further comprising a top, left and right reflective panel disposed about said solar panel and oriented to reflect additional sunlight onto said light receiving surface of said solar panel, thereby further amplifying said output.

22. The system for amplifying an output of a solar panel of claim 13, further comprising:

right and left upright reflective panels located on right and left sides of the solar panel and oriented for reflecting additional sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel; and

right and left upstanding refraction-reflection sheets on the right and left upstanding reflection panels, respectively, for scattering the additional sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel to further amplify the output while also preventing burning of the solar panel.

23. The system for amplifying an output of a solar panel of claim 20, further comprising:

right and left upstanding refraction-reflection sheets on the right and left upstanding reflection panels, respectively, for scattering the additional sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel to further amplify the output while also preventing burning of the solar panel; and

a top reflective panel, a top curved support surface located below the top reflective panel, and a top refraction-reflection sheet located below the top curved support surface;

wherein the top reflective panel, the top refracting-reflecting sheet, and the top curved support surface are all stacked together and oriented for reflecting additional sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel to further amplify the output while also preventing burning of the solar panel.

24. The system for amplifying the output of a solar panel of claim 13, further comprising at least one strip of side reflective material covered with a strip of side refractive-reflective material and oriented to reflect additional sunlight on said light receiving surface of said solar panel, thereby further amplifying said output while also preventing burning of said solar panel.

25. The system for amplifying the output of a solar panel of claim 1, further comprising diffraction grating sheets disposed on top of said refraction-reflection sheets for scattering reflected sunlight onto said light receiving surface of said solar panel, thereby further amplifying said output while also preventing burning of said solar panel.

26. A system for amplifying the output of a solar panel, comprising:

a solar panel having a light-receiving surface and a frame having an upper edge and a lower edge; and

at least one refraction-reflection cylinder having an inner surface and an outer lateral surface comprising a plurality of refractive elements;

wherein the at least one refraction-reflection cylinder is disposed in front of and proximate to the lower edge for reflecting sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel, thereby amplifying the output.

27. The system for amplifying an output of a solar panel of claim 26, wherein at least one of said inner and outer surfaces is coated with a reflective material for reflecting additional sunlight onto said light receiving surface of said solar panel, thereby further amplifying said output.

28. The system for amplifying an output of a solar panel of claim 26 further comprising a reflective cylinder having a reflective lateral outer surface, said reflective cylinder disposed inside said at least one refraction-reflective cylinder for reflecting additional sunlight onto said light receiving surface of said solar panel, thereby further amplifying said output.

29. A system for amplifying the output of a solar panel, comprising:

a solar panel having a light-receiving surface and a frame having an upper edge and a lower edge;

a bottom reflective panel, a right reflective panel, and a left reflective panel oriented to reflect additional sunlight on the light receiving surface of the solar panel, thereby amplifying the output; and

a refraction-reflection sheet in front of the light receiving surface for scattering the reflected sunlight from the bottom reflection panel, the right reflection panel and the left reflection panel to prevent burning of the solar panel.

30. The system for amplifying an output of a solar panel of claim 29, further comprising a top reflective panel oriented to reflect additional sunlight on said light receiving surface of said solar panel, thereby further amplifying said output.

31. A system for amplifying the output of a solar panel, comprising:

a solar panel having a light-receiving surface and a frame having an upper edge and a lower edge; and

a diffraction grating sheet for reflecting and scattering sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel, thereby amplifying the output.

32. The system for amplifying the output of a solar panel of claim 31, further comprising a reflective panel disposed below said diffraction grating sheet for reflecting additional sunlight onto said light receiving surface of said solar panel, thereby amplifying the output power generated by said solar panel.

33. The system for amplifying the output of a solar panel of claim 31, wherein a bottom side of said diffraction grating is coated with a reflective material.

34. A method of amplifying output power produced by a solar panel having a surface for receiving sunlight, the method comprising:

placing a first refraction-reflection sheet having a first side comprising a plurality of refractive elements and a second side in front of and proximate to a lower edge of the solar panel such that sunlight strikes the first side and is reflected onto the surface of the solar panel, thereby amplifying the output power generated by the solar panel.

35. The method of claim 34, further comprising placing a second refraction-reflecting sheet adjacent to the first refraction-reflecting sheet for reflecting additional sunlight onto the surface of the solar panel, thereby amplifying the output power produced by the solar panel.

36. The method of claim 34, further comprising stacking a second refraction-reflection sheet on top of the first refraction-reflection sheet for reflecting additional sunlight onto the surface of the solar panel, thereby amplifying the output power produced by the solar panel.

37. The method of claim 34, further comprising placing a second refraction-reflection sheet above and proximate to the solar panel, the second refraction-reflection sheet oriented to reflect additional sunlight onto the surface of the solar panel, thereby amplifying the output power produced by the solar panel.

38. The method of claim 34, further comprising:

placing a second, upright, refraction-reflection sheet in front of the solar panel such that sunlight enters one of the first side of the sheet and the second side of the sheet and exits through an opposite side and onto the solar panel;

wherein the second refraction-reflection sheet scatters sunlight on the surface of the solar panel, thereby illuminating a shadow on the surface of the solar panel, and thereby further amplifying the output power generated by the solar panel.

39. The method of claim 29, wherein placing the refractive-reflective sheet comprises: placing the first side with the plurality of refractive elements facing upward such that sunlight strikes the first side and is reflected onto the surface of the solar panel.

40. The method of claim 34, wherein the second side has a smooth surface, and wherein the method further comprises coating the smooth surface sheet with a color or reflective medium.

41. The method of claim 40, further comprising placing a second refraction-reflecting sheet coated with the color or the reflective medium over the solar panel and orienting the second refraction-reflecting sheet for reflecting additional sunlight onto the solar panel, thereby further amplifying the output power produced by the solar panel.

Technical Field

The present invention relates generally to solar power generation and more particularly to a system and method of amplifying solar panel output.

Background

A solar cell or photovoltaic cell is an electrical device that converts light energy directly into electrical energy through the photovoltaic effect, which is a physical and chemical phenomenon. A solar cell is a form of photovoltaic cell, a device whose electrical characteristics, such as voltage, current, or resistance, change when exposed to light. Thin film solar cells are second generation solar cells made by depositing one or more thin layers or films of photovoltaic material on a substrate such as glass, plastic, or metal. Thin film technology is less expensive than conventional crystalline silicon solar cells, but less efficient.

Solar panels absorb sunlight as an energy source to generate electricity or heat. Photovoltaic modules are packaged, connected components of photovoltaic solar cells. Most photovoltaic modules use crystalline silicon solar cells or thin film cells. Photovoltaic modules are typically rated by their Direct Current (DC) output power.

Solar panels present a problem in that even shadows that occlude a portion of the surface of the panel can reduce power output by as much as 90%. Another problem with solar panels is that in cities where the sun exposure is low and the solar energy is low due to the distance from the equator, the solar panels are expensive and the energy produced is not sufficient to actually recover the cost of the panels in a reasonable time frame.

Lenticular sheets are translucent plastic sheets made by unique and precise compression on their sheets with a pitch and curvature, with a series of vertically aligned plano-convex cylindrical lenses, called lenticules, on one side and a flat surface on the other side. The lenticular lens helps to convert the 2D image into various visual illusions in which a viewer can see a lenticular special effect when the orientation of the lenticular sheet is changed. The lenticular sheet may be made of: acrylic acid, APET, PETG, polycarbonate, polypropylene, PVC or polystyrene. Each of these different materials has different sensitivities to temperature and UV light.

An important characteristic of lenticular sheet material is the density of the lenses. The density of the lenses is expressed as Lenses Per Inch (LPI). The thickness of the lenticular sheet is negatively correlated with LPI; the lower the LPI, the thicker the lenticular sheet. Another important characteristic of lenticular sheets is the viewing angle. The viewing angle of the lenticular sheet is a V-shaped region in which the lenticular image can be clearly viewed. Other characteristics of lenticular lens-like sheeting can be found on the website lens-sheet. Printing on the Lenticular Sheet can be done in an interlaced fashion via an Inkjet Printer, as described in the article "breathing the Right Lenticular Sheet for Inkjet Printer" published by CG Sheng on the domain name ViCGI. com, and the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Lenticular sheets can also be used to display stereoscopic images, as described in the article "History of lenticulars and related autosteroscopic Methods" published by David e.roberts on the domain name of outlook.

Whole body imaging is a true autostereoscopic method (stereoscopic images can be viewed without special glasses). The overall image is composed of a large number of closely packed different microimages, one lens for each microimage, which are viewed by the viewer through an array of spherical convex lenses. This particular type of lens array is referred to as a fly-eye lens array or a monolithic lens array, and is described in detail in "the History of Integrated Print Methods" at Website molecular technology. Fly-eye lenses are commercially available, such as those available on lenticulars, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

Prismatic films, such as those manufactured by Kolon Industries and shown on Kolon IndustriesDCS, BK, LF, collect light from a light source such as LCDBLU by forming fine prismatic structures on a polyester film. Similarly, linear prism sheets, such as those manufactured by Ingemann and shown on Ingemann components.

In a paper "geometrical optics analysis light transmission and reflection characteristics of metallic prism sheets" (opt. eng.45(8), 084004(August 22,2006). doi:10.1117/1.2335871), written by Hwi Kim and Byoungho Lee, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, the light transmission and reflection characteristics of the metallic prism sheets were studied based on geometrical optics methods. For incident light having an arbitrary radiation intensity profile, an analytical method for finding a radiation intensity profile of light transmitted through and reflected by a single metal prism sheet is proposed. An analysis method with respect to a single prism sheet is generalized for analyzing a prism sheet layer composed of a plurality of prism sheets using a simple interaction model between adjacent prism sheets. The light transmission and reflection characteristics of the individual prism sheets and prism sheet layers were compared. It can be seen that the metallic prism sheet may be suitably applied to a transflective device or a brightness enhancement film for a liquid crystal display.

A paper "High-quality interferometric use of a multiprojector" (Optics ExpressVol.12, Issue 6, pp.1067-1076(2004)) written by Hongen Liao, Makoto Iwahara, Nobuhiko Hata, and Takeyoshi Dohi discloses the use of microlens arrays for whole body imaging, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

The article "Ray-optical gain and pseudo-chromatic imaging with Dove-prism arrays" written by Johannes Courtial and John Nelson, which is available at iop.org.and the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, shows that a tile consisting of an array of small, aligned Dove prisms can partially (over the width of the prisms) reverse one component of the Ray direction.

The use of a wave prism sheet to make LCDs look better is discussed in the article "FLAT-PANEL DISPLAYS: wave prism sheet LCDs look book better" available on the year 2007, month 9 and day 1, 2007 and is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

U.S. patent 4,414,316 to Conley, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, discloses a flexible, composite, transparent lenticular screen sheet in the form of a lenticular lens suitable for use in producing three-dimensional optical effects and characterized by having a uniform overall thickness and having uniform fine definition and quality. The lenticular form has a uniform focal length that is precisely related to the overall thickness of the composite sheet to provide a uniform, high quality three-dimensional optical effect throughout the lenticular screen sheet.

U.S. patent 6,995,914 to Conley et al, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, discloses a method of producing lenticular lens-like sheets having anisotropic optical properties.

Us patent 7,731,813 to Raymond et al, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, discloses a method for manufacturing a device for displaying interlaced images. The method comprises providing a film of transparent material and creating an array of lenses in the film by forming parallel sets of lenses on a first side of the film, and then bonding an interlaced image comprising a plurality of sets of elongate image elements to a second side of the film.

U.S. patent 8,411,363 to Niemuth, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, discloses a lenticular sheet comprising a first surface having at least two portions, an opposing second surface, and a plurality of lenticular lenses formed in the first surface. Each section of the first surface comprises a number of lenticular lenses per cm which is different from the number of lenticular lenses per cm of an adjacent section of the first surface.

U.S. patent publication No. 2004/0136079 and U.S. patent publication No. 2005/0286134 to Goggins, the contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, disclose lenticular lenses and methods for making the lenses, and in particular when the lenses are a web of lenticular lenses, make it possible to achieve finishing operations and various end-use applications of the lenses or to adapt them in conformity with the manufacture of the web of lenses.

A diffraction grating is a glass, plastic or metal plate painted with closely spaced parallel lines that produce a spectrum by diffraction and interference of light. A diffraction grating is an optical component with a periodic structure that splits and diffracts light into several beams of light traveling in different directions. The coloration that occurs is a form of structural coloration. The direction of the beam depends on the pitch of the grating and the wavelength of the light, so that the grating acts as a dispersive element. Holographic diffraction gratings are highly efficient imprinted Holographic Optical Elements (HOEs). Diffraction gratings are used to directly view and analyze spectra from different gas tubes and other light sources.

The present invention seeks to address at least some of the above problems found with solar panels by using refractive-reflective structures such as lenticular sheets or cylinders, reflective panels such as mirrors and diffraction grating sheets.

Disclosure of Invention

According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a system for amplifying the output of a solar panel, the system comprising: a solar panel having a light-receiving surface and a frame having an upper edge and a lower edge; and a first refraction-reflection sheet having a first side including a plurality of refraction elements and a second side. The first refraction-reflection sheet is disposed in front of and near the lower edge for reflecting sunlight onto a light receiving surface of the solar panel, thus amplifying an output.

In one embodiment, the second side of the first refraction-reflection sheet also has a plurality of refraction elements.

The first refraction-reflection sheet may be one of a lenticular sheet, a linear prism sheet, an array prism sheet, and an array prism sheet including a plurality of spherical lenses.

In one embodiment, the first refraction-reflection sheet includes a lenticular sheet, and wherein the plurality of refractive elements includes a plurality of linear lenticular lenses.

The solar panel may be a thin film solar panel, a polycrystalline solar panel, or a single crystalline silicon solar cell.

In one embodiment, the first refraction-reflection sheet is disposed such that the plurality of linear lenticular lenses extend in a direction perpendicular to the light receiving surface of the solar panel.

In one embodiment, the system further comprises a second refraction-reflection sheet similar to the first refraction-reflection sheet and disposed adjacent to the first refraction-reflection sheet for reflecting additional sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel, thus further amplifying the output.

In one embodiment, the system for amplifying the output of a solar panel further comprises a second refraction-reflection sheet disposed on top of the first refraction-reflection sheet for reflecting additional sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel, thus further amplifying the output.

In one embodiment, the system for amplifying the output of a solar panel further comprises a second refraction-reflection sheet disposed substantially above the top edge of the solar panel similar to the first refraction-reflection sheet and oriented to reflect additional sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel, thereby further amplifying the output.

In one embodiment, the system for amplifying the output of a solar panel further comprises an upstanding refraction-reflection sheet positioned in front of the solar panel and oriented such that sunlight passes through the refraction-reflection sheet and is scattered by the refracting element to fall on the surface of the solar panel thereby illuminating the shadow on the light receiving surface of the solar panel and further amplifying the output reduced by the shadow.

In one embodiment, the upstanding refraction-reflective sheet is coated with an anti-reflective coating or includes an anti-reflective film to allow more sunlight to pass through the upstanding refraction-reflective sheet.

In one embodiment, the second side of the first refraction-reflection sheet has a smooth surface coated with a color or a reflection medium for reflecting additional sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel, thus further amplifying the output.

In one embodiment, the system for amplifying the output of a solar panel further comprises a reflective panel disposed under the first refraction-reflection sheet for reflecting additional sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel to further amplify the output while also preventing burning of the solar panel.

In one embodiment, the system for amplifying the output of a solar panel further comprises a reflective panel disposed under the first refraction-reflection sheet for reflecting additional sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel to further amplify the output while also preventing burning of the solar panel.

In one embodiment, the reflective panel comprises a panel or mirror having a brightly colored surface.

In one embodiment, the system for amplifying the output of a solar panel further comprises a first curved support surface disposed below the first refraction-reflection sheet.

In one embodiment, the system for amplifying the output of a solar panel further comprises first and second curved support surfaces disposed under the first and second refraction-reflection sheets, respectively.

In one embodiment, the system for amplifying the output of a solar panel further comprises a transparent curved support surface disposed above the reflective panel and supporting the first refraction-reflection sheet.

In one embodiment, the system for amplifying the output of a solar panel further comprises right and left upstanding refraction-reflection sheets positioned on the right and left sides of the solar panel and oriented to reflect additional sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel to further amplify the output.

In one embodiment, the system for amplifying the output of a solar panel further comprises right and left upright reflective panels located on the right and left sides of the solar panel and oriented to reflect additional sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel to further amplify the output

In one embodiment, the system for amplifying the output of a solar panel further comprises a top, left and right reflective panel disposed about the solar panel and oriented to reflect additional sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel, thereby further amplifying the output.

In one embodiment, the system for amplifying the output of a solar panel further comprises: right and left upright reflective panels located on right and left sides of the solar panel and oriented for reflecting additional sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel; right and left upstanding refraction-reflection sheets respectively positioned on the right and left upstanding reflection panels for scattering additional sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel to further amplify the output while also preventing burning of the solar panel.

In one embodiment, the system for amplifying a solar panel further comprises: right and left upright refraction-reflection sheets respectively positioned on the right and left upright reflection panels for scattering additional sunlight onto a light receiving surface of the solar panel to further amplify the output while also preventing burning of the solar panel; and a top reflective panel, a top curved support surface below the top reflective panel, and a top refraction-reflection sheet below the top curved support surface. The top reflective panel, the top refracting-reflecting sheet, and the top curved support surface are all stacked together and oriented for reflecting additional sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel to further amplify the output while also preventing burning of the solar panel.

In one embodiment, the system for amplifying the output of a solar panel further comprises at least one side reflective material strip covered with a side refractive-reflective material strip and oriented to reflect additional sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel, thus further amplifying the output while also preventing burning of the solar panel.

In one embodiment, the system for amplifying the output of a solar panel further comprises a diffraction grating sheet disposed on top of the refraction-reflection sheet for scattering reflected sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel, thereby further amplifying the output while also preventing burning of the solar panel.

In another aspect of the invention, there is provided a system for amplifying the output of a solar panel, the system comprising: a solar panel having a light-receiving surface and a frame having an upper edge and a lower edge; and at least one refraction-reflection cylinder having an inner surface and an outer lateral surface comprising a plurality of refractive elements. At least one refraction-reflection cylinder is disposed in front of and proximate to the lower edge for reflecting sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel, thus amplifying the output.

In one embodiment, at least one of the outer and inner surfaces of the at least one refraction-reflection cylinder is coated with a reflective material for reflecting additional sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel, thus further amplifying the output.

In one embodiment, the system for amplifying the output of a solar panel further comprises a reflective cylinder having a reflective lateral outer surface, the reflective cylinder being disposed inside the at least one refraction-reflective cylinder for reflecting additional sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel, thereby further amplifying the output.

In yet another aspect of the present invention, a system for amplifying an output of a solar panel is provided, the system comprising: a solar panel having a light-receiving surface and a frame having an upper edge and a lower edge; a bottom, right and left reflective panels oriented to reflect additional sunlight on a light receiving surface of the solar panel, thus amplifying the output; and a refraction-reflection sheet located in front of the light receiving surface for scattering the reflected sunlight from the bottom reflection panel, the right reflection panel and the left reflection panel to prevent burning of the solar panel.

In one embodiment, the system for amplifying the output of a solar panel further comprises a top reflective panel oriented to reflect additional sunlight on the light receiving surface of the solar panel, thus further amplifying the output.

In yet another aspect of the present invention, a system for amplifying an output of a solar panel is provided, the system comprising: a solar panel having a light-receiving surface and a frame having an upper edge and a lower edge; and a diffraction grating sheet for reflecting and scattering sunlight onto a light receiving surface of the solar panel, thereby amplifying an output.

In one embodiment, the system for amplifying the output of a solar panel further comprises a reflective panel disposed under the diffraction grating sheet for reflecting additional sunlight onto a light receiving surface of the solar panel, thereby amplifying the output power generated by the solar panel. In another embodiment, the bottom side of the diffraction grating is coated with a reflective material for reflecting additional sunlight onto the light receiving surface of the solar panel, thus amplifying the output power produced by the solar panel.

According to yet another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of amplifying power generated by a solar panel having a shadow cast on a portion of a surface thereof, the method comprising: a catadioptric sheet having a first side and a second side is placed proximate to and substantially in front of the solar panel such that sunlight strikes one of the first side and the second side of the sheet and is reflected onto a surface of the solar panel. The refraction-reflection sheet scatters the reflected sunlight on the surface of the solar panel, thereby illuminating the shadow on the surface of the solar panel, reducing its darkness and thus amplifying the output power produced by the solar panel.

In one embodiment, the first side has a plurality of refractive elements and the second side comprises a smooth surface. In another embodiment, the first side and the second side each have a plurality of refractive elements.

In one embodiment, placing the refractive-reflective sheet comprises placing the first side having the plurality of refractive elements facing upward such that sunlight strikes the first side and is reflected onto a surface of the solar panel. The method may include coating the smooth surface of the second side of the refractive-reflective sheet with a color or with a reflective medium.

In another embodiment, placing the refraction-reflection sheet includes placing the second side having a smooth surface facing upward such that sunlight strikes the second side and is reflected onto the surface of the solar panel.

In one embodiment, the refractive-reflective sheet is a lenticular sheet, and the plurality of refractive elements includes a plurality of lenticular lenses. The plurality of lenticular lenses may be linear or non-linear.

In another embodiment, the refractive-reflective sheet is a linear prism sheet.

In yet another embodiment, the refractive-reflective sheet is an array prism sheet. The array prism sheet may include a plurality of spherical lenses.

In one embodiment, a refractive-reflective sheet is placed on top of a reflective panel that reflects additional sunlight through the refractive-reflective sheet and onto the surface of the solar panel. The reflective panel may include a panel having a bright colored surface or a panel having a reflective surface such as a mirror.

In one embodiment, the refractive-reflective sheet is rectangular and flat. In another embodiment, the refractive-reflective sheet is formed as a cylinder. In yet another embodiment, the refractive-reflective sheet is formed as a concave dish to direct sunlight at the solar panel from multiple angles. In yet another embodiment, the refraction-reflection sheet is formed as a convex panel to further spread sunlight on the solar panel.

In one embodiment, the solar panel and the refraction-reflection sheet are movable to track sunlight. In another embodiment, the catadioptric sheet is directed at the sun at critical times to improve the collection of sunlight.

In one embodiment, the solar panel comprises a plurality of solar panels mounted on a tower.

In one embodiment, the solar panel comprises a thin film solar panel. In another embodiment, the solar panel comprises a single crystalline silicon solar cell. In yet another embodiment, the solar panel comprises a solar roof piece, such as a solar roof panel.

In another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a system for amplifying the output power of a solar panel, the system comprising a solar panel and a refraction-reflection sheet for implementing any one of the aforementioned methods of amplifying the output power of a solar panel.

In yet another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of amplifying output power produced by a solar panel having a shadow of an object cast on a portion of its surface, the method comprising: a catadioptric sheet having a first side and a second side is placed between the object and the solar panel such that sunlight enters one of the first side of the sheet and the second side of the sheet and exits via the opposite side and onto the solar panel. The refraction-reflection sheet scatters sunlight on the surface of the solar panel, thereby illuminating the shadow on the surface of the solar panel, reducing its darkness, and thus amplifying the output power produced by the solar panel.

In one embodiment, the first side has a plurality of refractive elements and the second side comprises a smooth surface. In another embodiment, the first side and the second side each have a plurality of refractive elements.

In one embodiment, placing the refraction-reflection sheet includes placing a first side having a plurality of refractive elements facing a source of sunlight such that sunlight enters the first side and exits a second side having a smooth surface.

In another embodiment, positioning the refraction-reflection sheet includes positioning the second side having a smooth surface facing the solar light source such that sunlight enters the second side and exits the first side having the plurality of refractive elements.

In one embodiment, the refractive-reflective sheet is a lenticular sheet, and the plurality of refractive elements includes a plurality of lenticular lenses.

In another embodiment, the refraction-reflection sheet includes a plurality of convex lenses.

In yet another embodiment, the refractive-reflective sheet comprises an array of dove prisms.

In another embodiment, the refraction-reflection sheet is a corrugated prism sheet.

In one embodiment, the refractive-reflective sheet is positioned substantially in a direction parallel to the solar panel.

In one embodiment, the refractive-reflective sheet is coated with an anti-reflective coating to allow more sunlight to pass through the refractive-reflective sheet. In another embodiment, the refractive-reflective sheet further comprises an anti-reflective film to allow more sunlight to pass through the refractive-reflective sheet.

In yet another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of amplifying output power for a solar panel having a shadow cast on a portion of a surface thereof, the method comprising: placing a first catadioptric sheet having a first side and a second side between the object and the solar panel such that sunlight enters one of the first side of the sheet and the second side of the sheet and exits via the opposite side; and placing a second catadioptric sheet having a first side and a second side proximate to and substantially in front of the solar panel such that sunlight exiting the first catadioptric sheet is reflected from the second catadioptric sheet and onto a surface of the solar panel. Each of the first and second refraction-reflection sheets scatters sunlight on the surface of the solar panel, thereby illuminating a shadow on the surface of the solar panel, reducing its darkness, and thereby amplifying the output power generated by the solar panel.

In one embodiment, the method further comprises placing a reflective panel under the first refraction-reflector sheet for reflecting additional sunlight through the first refraction-reflector sheet and onto the surface of the solar panel.

In yet another aspect of the present invention, a system for amplifying the output power of a solar panel is provided, the system comprising a solar panel, a first refraction-reflection sheet and a second refraction-reflection sheet, for implementing the aforementioned method of amplifying the output power of a solar panel.

Drawings

Embodiments will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1A is a perspective view of a system of two solar panels used to illustrate various embodiments of the present invention, showing a measurement of the current produced by the solar panels given using a multimeter;

FIG. 1B is a perspective view of another system of solar panels, wherein one panel has shadows of objects cast thereon;

FIG. 1C is a perspective view of a refractive-reflective sheet in the form of a single-sided linear lenticular sheet as known in the art;

FIG. 1D is a perspective view of a refraction-reflection sheet in the form of a linear prism sheet as known in the art;

FIG. 1E is a perspective view of a refractive reflector sheet in the form of a prism array sheet comprising spherical convex lens elements, referred to as a fly-eye lens;

FIG. 2A is a perspective view of the system of FIG. 1B, including a catadioptric sheet on the ground in front of and proximate to a lower edge of one of the solar panels, such that sunlight is reflected on the catadioptric sheet and then onto a surface of the solar panel to amplify its output power, according to an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 2B is a perspective view of the system of FIG. 1A without shadows of objects cast on either of the two solar panels;

FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the system of FIG. 1A, including two adjacent refraction-reflection sheets on the ground in front of and proximate to the lower edge of one of the solar panels, such that sunlight is reflected on the refraction-reflection sheets and then onto the surface of the solar panels to amplify its output power, according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4 is a perspective view of the system as shown in FIG. 3, except that two refraction-reflection sheets are stacked on top of each other and in front of and near the ground surface of the lower edge of one of the solar panels, according to an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of the system as shown in FIG. 4, but with a third catadioptric sheet placed on the ground adjacent to the two stacked catadioptric sheets for reflecting additional sunlight onto the surface of the same solar panel, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 6 is a perspective view of the system as shown in FIG. 2B, but with one retro-reflective sheet placed on the ground in front of and near the lower edge of one of the solar panels and another retro-reflective sheet located near the top edge of the same solar panel and angled for reflecting sunlight onto the surface of the solar panel, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 7A is a perspective view of the system of FIG. 1B, including an upstanding refraction-reflection sheet positioned in front of a solar panel having a shadow mask on a portion of its surface such that sunlight passes through the refraction-reflection sheet and onto the surface of the solar panel to amplify the output of the solar panel, according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 7B is a perspective view of the system of FIG. 1A including an upright catadioptric sheet positioned to the front of the solar panel such that sunlight passes through the catadioptric sheet and onto the surface of the solar panel to amplify the output of the solar panel, according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 8A is a perspective view of the system of FIG. 1B including a first refraction-reflection sheet on the ground placed in front of the solar panel near its lower edge and a second upright refraction-reflection sheet in front of the solar panel to amplify the output power of the solar panel, according to an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 8B is a perspective view of the embodiment of FIG. 8A without shadows of objects cast on any of the solar panels;

FIG. 9A is a perspective view of the system of FIG. 1B, including a reflective panel, such as a mirror, as known in the art for reflecting sunlight onto a solar panel that is partially shaded by a shadow to amplify the output power of the solar panel;

FIG. 9B is a perspective view of the system of FIG. 9A without shadows of objects cast on either of the two solar panels;

FIG. 10 is a perspective view of a system similar to that of FIG. 9B, but using a refractive-reflective sheet coated with a reflective material;

FIG. 11A is a perspective view of the system of FIG. 9A, but including a refraction-reflection sheet placed on the reflective panel to amplify the output power of the solar panel, according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 11B is a perspective view of the embodiment of FIG. 11A without a shadow of an object being cast on either of the two solar panels;

FIG. 12 is a perspective view of a system similar to that of FIG. 9B, but additionally having a refractive-reflective sheet coated with a reflective material placed on top of a reflective panel, according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 13 is a perspective view of the system as shown in FIG. 12, but with one of the retro-reflective sheets coated with a reflective material placed on the ground in front of and proximate to the lower edge of one of the solar panels and another of the retro-reflective sheets coated with a reflective material positioned proximate to the top edge of the same solar panel and angled for reflecting sunlight onto the surface of the solar panel, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 14 is a perspective view of a system of solar panels similar to the system of FIG. 1A for comparing the effect of shadows cast by upright refractor-reflector sheets and shadows cast by opaque objects on the power generated by the solar panels;

FIG. 15A is a system of two thin film 7 watt solar panels, shown with voltage measurements used to establish a reference for comparison;

FIG. 15B is a system of the solar panel of FIG. 15A, shown with current measurements used to establish a reference for comparison;

FIG. 16A is the system of solar panels of FIG. 15A with shadows of an object cast on one of the two solar panels, showing current measurements;

FIG. 16B is a system of the solar panel of FIG. 16A, shown with voltage measurements;

FIG. 17A is a system of the solar panel of FIG. 16A including a reflective panel, such as a mirror, placed on the ground in front of the solar panel near its lower edge, showing current measurements;

FIG. 17B is a system of the solar panel of FIG. 17A, but showing voltage measurements;

FIG. 18A is a system of the solar panel of FIG. 16A including a refraction-reflection sheet placed on the ground in front of the solar panel near its lower edge, showing current measurements;

FIG. 18B is a system of the solar panel of FIG. 18A, shown with voltage measurements;

FIG. 19A is a system of the solar panel of FIG. 16A, including a reflective panel, such as a mirror, placed on the ground in front of the solar panel near its lower edge and a refraction-reflection sheet on top of the reflective panel, showing current measurements;

FIG. 19B is a system of the solar panel of FIG. 19A, shown with voltage measurements;

FIG. 20A is a system of solar panels as in FIG. 15A, including three refractor-reflector sheets placed on the ground in front of the solar panels at right angles to the solar panels and near the lower edges of the solar panels, showing current measurements;

FIG. 20B is a system of the solar panel of FIG. 20A, shown with voltage measurements;

FIG. 21 is a system of solar panels including three reflective panels placed on the ground in front of a first solar panel near its lower edge and at right angles to the first solar panel, and three reflective panels placed on the ground in front of a second solar panel near its lower edge and at optimal angles to the second solar panel, each having a refraction-reflection sheet on top of it;

FIG. 22 is a system of solar panels similar to the system of FIG. 21, but wherein both panels have an optimal angle relative to the reflective panel;

FIG. 23 is a system of solar panels similar to the system of FIG. 21, but wherein both panels have a right angle with respect to the reflective panel;

FIG. 24A is a front perspective view of a solar panel having a plurality of refraction-reflection cylinders according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 24B is a paperboard cylinder made of a reflective paperboard material;

FIG. 25A is a perspective view of a system for comparing current of a solar panel having a refraction-reflection cylinder in front of and near a lower edge of the solar panel to a control solar panel;

FIG. 25B is a perspective view of a system for comparing the voltage of a solar panel having a refraction-reflection cylinder in front of and near the lower edge of the solar panel as shown in FIG. 25A to a control solar panel;

FIG. 26A is a perspective view of a system similar to that of FIG. 25A, wherein the refractive-reflective cylinder is additionally fitted with a cylinder made of reflective paperboard material as shown in FIG. 24B, showing current measurements;

FIG. 26B is a perspective view of a system similar to that of FIG. 26A, showing voltage measurements;

FIG. 27A is a perspective view of a system for comparing the performance of a solar panel having a refraction-reflection cylinder in front of and near the lower edge of the solar panel as shown in FIG. 25A with the performance of a solar panel having a refraction-reflection sheet placed in front of and near the lower edge of another solar panel, showing current measurements;

FIG. 27B is a perspective view of a system similar to the system of FIG. 27A, shown with voltage measurements;

FIG. 28 is a perspective view of a system of solar panels, one of which has a transparent riot shield for reflecting solar rays having a refraction-reflection sheet attached thereto, the shield being disposed in front of and proximate to a lower edge of one of the solar panels;

FIG. 29 is a perspective view of a system similar to that of FIG. 28, but with an additional riot shield having attached thereto a refraction-reflection sheet that remains above the top edge of the same solar panel;

FIG. 30 is a perspective view of a system similar to that of FIG. 28, but with a reflective panel, such as a mirror, placed under the blast shield;

FIG. 31 is a perspective view of a system similar to that of FIG. 30, but additionally having two upstanding refraction-reflection sheets placed on the sides of the same solar panel with an anti-riot shield placed in front of it;

FIG. 32 is a perspective view of a system similar to that of FIG. 30, but additionally having two upright reflective panels placed on the sides of the same solar panel with an anti-riot shield placed in front of it;

FIG. 33 is a perspective view of a solar panel having a reflective material coated refraction-reflection sheet placed in front of and near the lower edge of one panel and three reflection panels placed to the sides and above the same solar panel for reflecting solar rays on the same solar panel;

FIG. 34 is a diagram showing a solar panel surrounded by four linear lenticular sheets having the best polarization of linear lenticular lenses that have been observed for reflecting solar rays onto the solar panel;

FIG. 35 is a view similar to that of FIG. 34, but wherein the four linear lenticular sheets are curved in a convex manner relative to the solar panel;

FIG. 36 is a view similar to that of FIG. 34, but wherein the four linear lenticular sheets are curved in a concave manner relative to the solar panel;

FIG. 37 is a view similar to that of FIG. 34, but with the two linear lenticular sheets curved in a convex manner relative to the solar panel and the two linear lenticular sheets curved in a concave manner relative to the solar panel;

FIG. 38 is a diagram showing a solar panel surrounded by four linear lenticular sheets having sub-optimal polarizations of linear lenticular lenses that have been observed for reflecting solar rays onto the solar panel;

FIG. 39 is a view similar to that of FIG. 38, but wherein the four linear lenticular sheets are curved in a convex manner relative to the solar panel;

FIG. 40A is a perspective view of a system of solar panels, one panel surrounded from three sides by reflective panels, each reflective panel comprising a reflective panel and a refraction-reflection sheet placed on top of the reflective panel, showing current measurements;

FIG. 40B is the system of FIG. 40A, but with voltage measurements shown;

FIG. 41A is a system similar to FIG. 40A, but also with a shadow cast on one of the solar panels;

FIG. 41B is a system similar to FIG. 40B, but also with a shadow cast on one of the solar panels;

FIG. 42 is a perspective view of a system of solar panels, one surrounded from 4 sides with reflective panels, two of which are mirrors covered with lenticular lens-like sheeting placed on the sides of the solar panel, and a transparent explosion proof shield with mirror backing to the top and bottom;

FIG. 43 is a perspective view of a system of solar panels, one surrounded from 4 sides with reflective panels, three of which are lenticular sheet covered mirrors placed on the sides and bottom of the solar panel, and a transparent surface such as a storm shield covered with lenticular sheet and having a mirror backing;

FIG. 44 is a perspective view of a system of solar panels, wherein one panel has three reflective panels covered with a refraction-reflector sheet placed in front of and proximate to a lower edge of one of the solar panels;

FIG. 45 is a perspective view of the system of FIG. 44, but additionally having two upright reflective panels with a refraction-reflector cover placed on either side of the panel, the reflective panels having a reflective panel and a refraction-reflector cover;

FIG. 46A is a perspective view of the system of FIG. 40A, but additionally having a refractive-reflective sheet, such as a lenticular sheet, bent and placed in front of the panel with the reflector panel;

FIG. 46B is a top view of the system of FIG. 46A;

FIG. 47 is a perspective view of a system similar to that of FIG. 46A, but without the refraction-reflection sheet placed on the three reflective panels;

FIG. 48 is a perspective view of a system similar to that of FIG. 47, but additionally including a reflective panel, such as a mirror, held above and near the top edge of the solar panel surrounded by other reflective panels;

FIG. 49 is a perspective view of a system of solar panels, one panel having four reflective panels with a refraction-reflector cover in front of and near the bottom edge of its bottom edge, and an additional two strips of reflective material with a refraction-reflector cover attached to the side edges of the panel;

FIG. 50 is a perspective view of a system similar to that of FIG. 49, but featuring an additional strip of reflective material with a refractive-reflective cover attached to the top edge of the panel; and

FIG. 51 is a perspective view of a system of two solar panels, each having a reflective panel with a refractive-reflective cover sheet in front of and near its bottom edge, and one of the panels additionally having a diffraction grating sheet placed on top of the refractive-reflective sheet.

Detailed Description

While the foregoing background has identified certain problems known in the art, the present invention provides, in part, new and useful applications.

Fig. 1A is a perspective view of a prior art system of two 30 watt single crystal solar panels 40, 45. The output currents of solar panels 40 and 45 are substantially the same, making it a good system for comparing various configurations. Fig. 1B is a perspective view of another prior art system of two 2.5 watt amorphous (thin film) solar panels 40, 45, where one solar panel 40 has a shadow 30 of an object 20 that is cast on the solar panel 40 when sunlight 10 is directed at the solar panel. Two multimeters 60, 65 are used to measure the output current of the solar panels 40 and 45, respectively. It has been observed that even local shadows that occlude a portion of the solar panel 40 have a significant effect on the output current, and therefore on its output power. In this example, the panels 40 and 45 are thin film solar panels. As shown, multimeter 65 shows an output current of 0.1A for panel 45, while multimeter 60 shows an output current of 0.01A (10mA) for panel 40. Although only a portion of the surface of the panel 40 is blocked by the shadow 30 of the object 20, the drop in output current is about 90%.

Fig. 1C is a perspective view of a refractive-reflective sheet in the form of a single-sided linear lenticular sheet 800, as known in the art. The linear lenticular sheet 800 has a plurality of refractive elements in the form of a plurality of linear lenticular lenses 810 on a first side thereof. Fig. 1D is a perspective view of a refraction-reflection sheet in the form of a linear prism sheet 900 as known in the art. The linear prism sheet 900 has a plurality of refractive elements in the form of a plurality of linear prism elements 910 on one side thereof. FIG. 1E is a perspective view of a refractive reflective sheet in the form of a prism array sheet comprising spherical convex lens elements, referred to as a fly-eye lens. The array prism sheet 1000 includes spherical elements 1010. In other embodiments (not shown), the prism elements may be conical prisms, pyramidal prisms, dove prisms, or the like. In other embodiments (not shown), the refraction-reflection sheet may be a corrugated prism sheet. In any of the above embodiments, the refractive element may also be formed or located on a second side (not shown) other than the first side.

The inventors have used the refraction-reflection sheet shown in fig. 1C through 1E in combination with solar panels and other reflective panels to amplify the output of solar energy in the presence of shadows or other conditions, as explained below.

FIG. 2A is a perspective view of the system of FIG. 1B, featuring a catadioptric sheet 100 for reducing shadows 30, according to an embodiment of the invention. The refraction-reflection sheet 100 is placed substantially in front of the solar panel 40 and lying on the ground near its lower edge. The refraction-reflection sheet 100 receives solar light from an area around an area covered by the shadow 30. The received sunlight is reflected and scattered onto the surface of the solar panel 40. This causes the shaded portion 230 on panel 40 to become brighter and less dark than the original shading 30 of FIG. 1B. Accordingly, multimeter 60 has been observed to have an output current of about 0.02A. Although still producing an output current (0.10A) that is 80% lower than the output current produced by a solar panel 45 that is part of the solar panel 45 without any shadow masking, the output current of a panel 40 in which the refraction-reflection sheet 100 is placed on the ground in front of the solar panel 40 is twice (i.e., increased by 100%) the output current of the solar panel 40 in the case where the refraction-reflection sheet 100 is not used as shown in fig. 1B. A small change in output voltage was observed. Since the output power of a solar panel is equal to the product of the output voltage and the output current, an increase in the output current produces a similar increase in the output power. Thus, with respect to fig. 2A, the use of the refraction-reflection sheet 100 increases the output power of the solar panel partially blocked by the shadow by 100%.

Fig. 2B is a perspective view of the system of fig. 1A, but with a refraction-reflection sheet 100 placed on the ground in front of the solar panel 40 in the same manner as the embodiment in fig. 2A without shadows of objects cast on either of the two solar panels 40 and 45. Thus, solar panel 45 exposed to sunlight 10 produces a current of 1.16A as indicated by multimeter 65. The placement of the catadioptric sheet 100 on the ground in front of and near the lower edge of the solar panel 40 causes additional sunlight 10 to be reflected onto the solar panel 40. Thus, the output current produced by solar panel 40 and indicated by multimeter 65 was observed to be 1.30A, which is higher than the output current of solar panel 45. Thus using a catadioptric sheet 100 placed on the ground in front of the panel 40 gives an approximately 12% increase in output power when subjected to the same amount of sunlight 10.

Fig. 3 is a perspective view of the system of fig. 2B, but including two adjacent refraction- reflection sheets 100 and 102 on the ground in front of and near the lower edge of the solar panel 40, such that the sunlight 10 is reflected on the refraction-reflection sheets and then onto the surface of the solar panel 40 to amplify its output power, according to an embodiment of the present invention. The refractive-reflective sheet 100 is at the proximal end of the solar panel 40 and the sheet 102 is at the distal end of the solar panel 40. In this case, solar panel 45 produces a current of 1.18A, but solar panel 40 produces 1.35A. Therefore, the improvement in output power is about 14.4%. Thus, the additional refraction-reflection sheet 102 at the distal end of the solar panel 40 provides an additional, albeit not significant, increase in the output power of the solar panel as compared to a solar panel having one refraction-reflection sheet used therewith.

Fig. 4 is a perspective view of the system as shown in fig. 3, except that two refraction- reflection sheets 100 and 102 are stacked on top of each other and in front of and near the lower edge of the solar panel 40 for reflecting sunlight 10 onto the surface of the solar panel 40 on the ground, according to an embodiment of the present invention. In this embodiment, sheets 100 and 102 are linear lenticular sheets each having linear lenticular lenses oriented in the same direction, i.e., having the same polarization. The output current of the solar panel 40 was observed to be 1.36A compared to the output current of 1.16A from the solar panel 45. Thus, an increase of more than 17% was observed. Therefore, the stacking of the refractive-reflective sheets is preferably performed using a single sheet and preferably two adjacent sheets, as is performed in the embodiments of fig. 2B and 3, respectively.

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of the system as shown in FIG. 4, but with a third catadioptric sheet 104 placed on the ground adjacent to the two stacked catadioptric sheets 100 and 102 for reflecting additional sunlight onto the surface of the solar panel 40, according to an embodiment of the invention. The observed current generated by solar panel 40 was 1.42A compared to 1.16A for solar panel 45. Thus, by using two stacked sheets, such as linear lenticular sheets 100, 102 having the same polarization, and an additional adjacent sheet 104 placed from the far end of the stacked sheet relative to the lower edge of the solar panel 40, an increase in output of over 20% in current/power can be achieved.

FIG. 6 is a perspective view of the system as shown in FIG. 2B, but with one catadioptric sheet 100 placed on the ground in front of and near the lower edge of the solar panel 40 and another catadioptric sheet 106 near the top edge of the same solar panel 40 and angled for reflecting sunlight onto the surface of the solar panel, according to an embodiment of the invention. The output current of panel 45 is 1.17A and the output current of panel 40 is 1.52. Thus, the two sheets 100 and 106 increase the output current of the panel 40 by reflecting more sunlight thereon. An improvement of about 30% in output current.

In one embodiment, the refractive-reflective sheets used each have a first side with a plurality of refractive elements and a second side with a smooth surface. In one embodiment, the refractive-reflective sheet is placed on the ground with the side containing the refractive elements facing upward for receiving and reflecting sunlight toward the solar panel. In this embodiment, the smooth surface of the second side of the refraction-reflective sheet may be colored to increase the solar reflectance of the sheet. Alternatively, the smooth surface of the second side of the refraction-reflection sheet may be coated with a reflection medium. In another embodiment, the refraction-reflection sheet is placed on the ground with the smooth side facing upward for receiving and reflecting sunlight toward the solar panel.

In another embodiment, the side containing the refractive elements faces upward and the refractive elements are coated with a reflective coating to increase the amount of reflection of light by the solar panel. The coating may be part of the manufacturing process of the refractive-reflective sheet or may be coated on the top surface of the refractive element. The reflective paint or mirror coating may be silver, chrome, gold, platinum, bronze, red, green, blue or any other suitable color or combination of colors to control the reflected output and increase architectural color choices. Some of these embodiments will be illustrated with reference to fig. 10 and 12 to 13 described below. The resulting refraction-reflection sheet functions somewhat like a mirror booster, but has the added benefit of spreading the reflected light over the solar panel, which avoids burn-out, as further described below.

Turning to fig. 7A, fig. 7A is a perspective view of the system of fig. 1B featuring an upstanding refractor-reflector sheet 200 for reducing shadows, according to another embodiment of the present invention. In this embodiment, the refraction-reflection sheet 200 is placed between the object 20 casting the shadow 30 on the solar panel 40 and the solar panel 40. The sheet 200 is positioned so that sunlight enters one side of the sheet and exits the opposite side and reaches the solar panel. In one embodiment, placing the refraction-reflective sheet 200 between the object 20 and the solar panel 40 includes placing the refraction-reflective sheet 200 such that sunlight enters a first side having a plurality of refractive elements. In another embodiment, placing the refraction-reflective sheet 200 between the object 20 and the solar panel 40 includes placing the refraction-reflective sheet 200 such that sunlight enters the second side having a smooth surface. In another embodiment, placing the refraction-reflection sheet 200 on either side of the object 20 and the solar panel 40 includes placing the refraction-reflection sheet 200 such that sunlight enters the second side having a smooth surface. In yet another embodiment, the refractive-reflective sheet 200 has a plurality of refractive elements on both side surfaces. The refraction-reflection sheet 200 scatters sunlight on the surface of the solar panel, thus illuminating the shadow 330 on the surface of the solar panel, making it less dark, and thus amplifying the output power of the solar panel 40. As seen in fig. 7A, the output current produced using the sheet 200 is 600% of the output current measured without the sheet 200 as measured in the case of fig. 1B. Fig. 7B is a perspective view of the embodiment of fig. 1A with the refractive-reflective sheet 200 erected as in fig. 7A. In this case, the output current of the solar panel 40 (0.96A) is about 80% of the output current of the solar panel 45 (1.2A). Thus, the use of the refraction-reflection sheet 200 in the non-shadow configuration reduces the output current of the solar panel by about 20%, but greatly increases the output current by about 800% in the case where a shadow is cast on the solar panel. Overall, the average output power of a solar panel throughout the day can be increased by using an arrangement as in fig. 7A and 7B in areas where shadows may be cast on the panel for a large portion of the day.

Turning now to fig. 8A, fig. 8A is a perspective view of the system of fig. 1B, featuring two refraction- reflection sheets 100 and 200 for reducing shadows cast on a solar panel 40, according to yet another embodiment of the present invention. In this embodiment, the sunlight 10 casts a shadow 30 of the object 20 towards the solar panel 40 as before. The refraction-reflection sheet 200 is placed between the object 20 and the panel 40 such that the solar light 10 enters one side of the first refraction-reflection sheet 200 and exits toward the panel 40 from the other side. Additionally, another catadioptric sheet 100 is placed on the ground proximate to and generally in front of the solar panel 40 such that some of the sunlight exiting the sheet 200 is reflected on the catadioptric sheet 100 and onto the solar panel 40. The scattering effect of sunlight through both sheet 200 and sheet 100 causes the shadow 430 on the panel 40 to be greatly reduced. The output current observed from the panel 40 was observed to be 800% higher than the output current observed from the panel 45 in which the refraction-reflection sheet was not present. In other words, the current is reduced by only 20% compared to the panel 45 without shading thereon. Fig. 8B is a perspective view of the embodiment of fig. 8A without shadows of objects cast on either of the two solar panels. In this case, the output current (0.09A) of the panel 40 is 90% of the output current (0.1A) of the panel 45. In combination with a small reduction in the output voltage between the panel 45 and the panel 40, it has been observed that the output power of the panel 40 is about 88.76% of the output power of the panel 45. Advantageously, this arrangement greatly improves the performance of a solar panel that is partially occluded by a shadow, with virtually no performance loss when no shadow is present.

In another embodiment, the refractive-reflective sheet 100 has a plurality of refractive elements on both the first side and the second side. When the refraction-reflective sheet 100 is placed on the ground substantially in front of the solar panel 40, the sunlight 10 is reflected on the sheet 100 toward the solar panel 40.

Fig. 9A is a perspective view of the system of fig. 1B featuring a reflective panel 500 placed in front of the solar panel 40 in an attempt to reduce shadows 30 as is known in the art. The reflective panel 500 reflects sunlight onto the surface of the solar panel 40. However, since sunlight is concentrated on a small area of the panel, the shadow 30 is not significantly reduced. The current readings from multimeters 60 and 65 are similar to their readings in FIG. 1B.

Fig. 9B is a perspective view of a system having a reflective panel 500 similar to the reflective panel 500 of fig. 9A, but featuring a system of panels similar to fig. 1A without shadows of objects cast on either of the solar panels 40 and 45. Solar panel 40 produces 1.66A and solar panel 45 produces 1.19A. In this case, the output of the solar panel 40 is about 33% higher than the output of the solar panel 45 because the panel 40 receives both direct sunlight and reflected sunlight. However, the use of a mirror may defeat warranty for solar panel 40 because the reflection of the sun may be concentrated in a small area on the solar panel, which may result in burning of the cells. For example, when the sunlight 10 is in different directions and there is no shadow on the solar panel 40 for fig. 9A, or the sunlight that normally falls directly on the solar panel 40 and the sunlight that is directly reflected from the reflective panel 500 for fig. 9B will both be concentrated in a small area, thus above the rating of the solar panel 40, resulting in burning of the cells on that area. The battery burn is typically not covered by the warranty of the solar panel.

FIG. 10 is a perspective view of a system similar to that of FIG. 9B, but using a refractive-reflective sheet coated with a reflective material in place of a mirror. The refractive-reflective sheet is a linear lenticular sheet 550 coated with a reflective material and placed in front of and on the ground proximate the lower edge of the solar panel 40 with the lenticular lens side facing up, with the lower edge of the solar panel 40. Sunlight 10 is reflected on the sheet 550 and then onto the surface of the solar panel 40. The output current observed from the solar panel was 1.43A compared to 1.15A for the solar panel 45 without the refraction-reflection sheet or the lenticular sheet placed in front thereof. Thus, the output current and thus the output power is increased by 24%. The output current observed for the solar panel 40 is less than that observed using a reflective panel such as a mirror as described in fig. 9B. However, since the plurality of lenticular lenses reflect the solar rays in different directions, the reflected rays on the solar panel 40 are distributed on the surface of the solar panel 40 and are not concentrated in a certain area. The distribution of the solar rays ensures that the rating of the solar panel 40 is not exceeded, and therefore burnout does not occur, while generating a slightly smaller current than observed when using mirrors. Advantageously, damage to the solar panel 40 is avoided while the output power is significantly amplified.

Fig. 11A is a perspective view of the system of fig. 9A, featuring a reflective panel 500 and a refraction-reflection sheet 600 placed on the reflective panel 500 for reducing shadows 30, according to an embodiment of the present invention. The sunlight falling on the refraction-reflection sheet 600 goes through two paths. A portion of the sunlight is reflected onto the refraction-reflection sheet 600 and then reflected to the surface of the panel 40. Another portion of the solar light passes through the refraction-reflection sheet 600, is reflected on the reflection panel 500, passes through the refraction-reflection sheet 600 again, and then falls on the panel 40. Advantageously, more sunlight eventually falls on the panel 40 and, therefore, the output current increases compared to the output current produced by a shaded panel 40 as in fig. 1B. Additionally, although the shadow is cast on a portion of solar panel 40, the power generated by solar panel 40 is close to the power generated by solar panel 45. For example, an output current of 0.29A is observed from the solar panel 40. Thus, the output current of the panel 40 (0.29A) is about 24% of the output current of the panel 45. In the presence of similar shadows cast on panel 40, testing with the same solar panel (not shown) resulted in panel 40 producing only 0.09A. Accordingly, the reflective panel 500 and the refraction-reflection sheet 600 increase the output power by 3.2 times, or 320%, 0.29A/0.09A.

Fig. 11B is a perspective view of the embodiment of fig. 11A without a shadow of an object being cast on either of the two solar panels. In this case, solar panel 40 produces about 20% more power than solar panel 45, as indicated by the fact that: the output current of solar panel 40 is 1.42A and the output current of solar panel 45 is only 1.19A. In both fig. 11A and 11B, the use of the refraction-reflection sheet 600 scatters and scatters the sunlight reflected from the reflection panel 500 onto the cells of the solar panel 40, thereby preventing excessive sunlight from falling on a specific small area of the solar panel 40 to cause burning of the cells, while at the same time increasing the output power over that of a solar panel simply using direct sunlight. Although the power increase is slightly less than that of the system of fig. 9B in which the mirror is used alone (its power increase is 40%), the advantage of avoiding battery burn-out and warranty inefficiencies greatly compensates for the small difference in power increase. In one embodiment, the reflective panel 500 includes a brightly colored surface. In another embodiment, the reflective panel 500 includes a reflective surface of a mirror.

Fig. 12 is a perspective view of a system similar to that of fig. 9B, but additionally having a refractive-reflective sheet 550 coated with a reflective material placed on top of the reflective panel 500, according to an embodiment of the present invention. In this case, the current output observed from solar panel 40 is 1.53A and the current output produced by panel 45 is 1.18A. This corresponds to an increase in output current of about 30.5% (and since the voltage is about the same, the output power increases). The small increase in output current observed in the system of fig. 12, as compared to the case of fig. 10 where the reflective material coated refractive-reflective sheet 550 is used alone without a reflective panel, can be attributed to the small amount of reflective power from the reflective panel 500 in addition to the reflective power achieved by the reflective spray coating on the sheet 550. Similarly, the small increase in output current observed in fig. 12 over the system of fig. 11B may be attributed to the reflective coating applied to the sheet 550 as compared to using a refractive-reflective sheet or linear lenticular sheeting 600 without a reflective coating placed on top of the reflective panel 500.

Fig. 13 is a perspective view of a system similar to that of fig. 12, but utilizing an additional refractive-reflective sheet 552 coated with a reflective material and positioned over the solar panel 40 such that the coated surface of each of the sheets 550 and 552 is oriented to reflect sunlight onto the solar panel. For example, the refraction-reflection sheet 550 may be a linear lenticular sheet having its lens sides coated with a reflective material, and the refraction-reflection sheet 550 is placed on the ground in front of and near the lower edge of the solar panel 50. Similarly, the refraction-reflection sheet 552 may be a linear lenticular sheet having its lens sides coated with a reflective material, and is positioned near the top edge of the solar panel 40 and oriented such that the coated lens sides reflect the solar rays 10 onto the surface of the solar panel 40. The output current of panel 40 was observed to be 1.87A compared to the output current of 1.20A from panel 45. This amounts to an increase of 56%, and furthermore, wherein the light is distributed on the surface of the solar panel 40, which advantageously does not cause a burning of the cells.

In another embodiment, the color and/or gloss of the coating may be applied to the refractive elements or smooth sides of the refractive-reflective sheet. Coloring the refractive side may produce more or less reflection on the panel (because the sheet is placed on the ground with the refractive side facing up) than coloring a smooth side that may be at the bottom. The color may be changed to control the amount of light reflected from the refraction-reflection sheet and onto the solar panel. Advantageously, this allows the lens to be produced with a controlled reflected output, as well as creating an aesthetic add-on to the refractive-reflective sheet as a visible component of the solar panel system. Coloration may be added to the manufacturing process, thereby producing the material in that color or colors, and no painting is required. The color may be changed, thereby using a plurality of colors, and also the gloss may be mixed, thereby establishing a camouflage effect for the refraction-reflection sheet. This allows the refraction-reflector to blend into the background, act as a dazzling camouflage where high contrast images may disrupt the contour of the refraction-reflector, or simply act as architectural color choices to help blend or contrast with the structure or environment, or a combination thereof. Coloring may also be used for advertising, artwork, simulated roofing structures such as roof tiles or bricks.

Fig. 14 is a perspective view of a solar panel system in which a refraction-reflection sheet 200 is placed in front of a panel 40, no shadow of an object is cast on the panel 40, and a shadow 770 of an object 20 is cast on another panel 45. The patch 200 casts a light shadow 730 on the panel 40. The system compares the current generated by solar panel 40 with the retro-reflective sheet 200 placed in front of the solar panel 40 with the current generated by solar panel 45 with the shadow 770 of the object 20 cast on the solar panel 45. It can be seen that panel 40 produces 0.92A while panel 45 produces only 0.08A. Thus, the reduction in current generated due to the placement of the retro-reflective sheet 200 in front of the panel 40 is minimal compared to the reduction caused even by the partial shadow 770 of the object 20 on the panel 45.

Fig. 15A and 15B show a system for two thin film 7W solar panels used in testing embodiments of the present invention. In FIG. 15A multimeters 60 and 65 are configured for voltage measurement. It was determined that panel 40 produced 27.9V and panel 45 produced 27.5 V. Multimeters 60 and 65 are configured for current sensing in FIG. 15B. Panel 40 was found to yield 0.23A while panel 45 yielded 0.26A. Those minor variations in the voltage and current generated between panel 40 and panel 45 may be attributed to manufacturing differences.

Fig. 16A and 16B illustrate the system of fig. 15A and 15B, wherein a shadow of the object 20 is cast on the solar panel 40. In fig. 16A, it is found that solar panel 45 produces 0.26A, unchanged from fig. 15B, while solar panel 40, which is partially occluded by the shadow of object 20, produces only 0.03A compared to 0.23A in fig. 15A. Referring to fig. 16B, it is observed that the voltage from panel 40 drops from 27.9V to 26.6V, while panel 45 remains at 27.5V. By calculating the power, which is the product of voltage and current, it was found that the power was equal to 26.6V 0.03A 0.798W for the solar panel 40. In contrast, in the systems of fig. 15A and 15B, the power for the same solar panel 40 is 27.9V 0.23A 6.417W. Thus, the shadow causes the power of the solar panel 40 to drop to about 12.43% of the power generated without the shadow.

Fig. 17A and 17B illustrate a system in which a reflective panel 500, such as a mirror, is placed in front of and near the lower edge of the panel 40 for reflecting sunlight 10 onto the surface of the panel 40. In the case of using a mirror, the voltage generated by the panel 40 was found to be 27.0V. However, the current does not change as shown in fig. 17A. Thus, the power generated by the solar panel 40 is 27.0 x 0.03 — 0.81W, which is about 12.6% of the power generated by the same solar panel in fig. 15A and 15B without shading. Thus, in the presence of shadows, the mirror cannot significantly increase the power generated by the panel 40.

Fig. 18A and 18B show the system of fig. 15A and 15B, wherein a refraction-reflection sheet 100 is placed in front of and near the lower edge of the panel 40 for reflecting the sunlight 10 onto the surface of the panel 40. In this case, the measured current from the solar panel 40 is 0.05A and the voltage is 26.9V. Thus, the power is 1.345W, which is about 21% of the power produced by the panel 40 of the system in fig. 15A and 15B without shading. Accordingly, the refraction-reflection sheet 100, which may be a linear lenticular sheet or similar sheet, increases the power generated by the panel 40 in the presence of shadows.

Fig. 19A and 19B show the system of fig. 15A and 15B, wherein the refraction-reflection sheet 100 is stacked on top of the reflective panel 500, and both are placed in front of and near the lower edge of the panel 40 for reflecting the sunlight 10 onto the surface of the panel 40. In this case, the current measured from the solar panel was 0.09A, and the voltage was 27.4V. Thus, the power generated by solar panel 40 is 27.4V 0.09A-2.466W, which is about 38% of the power generated by the same solar panel in the unshaded configuration of fig. 15A and 15B. Thus, it can be seen that the combination of the reflective panel 500 and the refraction-reflective sheet stacked on top thereof more effectively reduces the power lost by causing shadows to be cast on the solar panel. The shadow 630 formed on the surface of the panel 40 is illuminated by the sunlight reflected by the reflective panel 500 and the sunlight refracted/scattered by the refraction-reflection sheet 100, and the refraction-reflection sheet 100 may be a linear lenticular lens-shaped sheet or the like.

Fig. 20A and 20B show a system of two 30 watt single crystal solar panels 40 and 45. Three refraction-reflection sheets 100 are placed in front of the solar panel 45. As shown, a first sheet is placed near the lower edge of the solar panel 45 and two adjacent sheets are placed adjacent to the first sheet. Additionally, the panels 45 are angled at about 90 degrees relative to the sheet. The current measurement produced by panel 45 is shown to be 1.76A compared to 1.13A produced by panel 40. Panel 45 shows that the voltage is 20.4 and panel 40 produces 20.2 volts. Thus, the power generated by the panel 45 is 35.90W, while the power generated by the panel 40 is only 22.83W. Thus, using three refractive-reflective sheets as shown and placing the solar panels perpendicular to the sheets produced 57% more power under similar sunlight conditions.

Fig. 21 shows a system of two solar panels 40 and 45. Three reflective panels 500 (e.g., mirrors) are placed in front of the panel 45 in the same manner as described above with reference to fig. 20A and 20B. Three reflective panels 500 (e.g., mirrors), each having the refraction-reflection sheet 100 stacked thereon, are placed in front of the panel 40 in the same manner as the three reflective panels placed in front of the panel 45. The solar panel 45 is placed at a 90 degree angle relative to the reflective panel. The solar panels 40 are placed at an optimal angle relative to the sheet (which reflects more sunlight onto the panels). It was found that solar panel 45 produced a current of 1.62A, while solar panel 40 produced a current of 1.78A. It was also found that solar panel 45 produced 20.5V, while solar panel 40 produced 20.4V.

Fig. 22 shows a system of two solar panels similar to the system of fig. 21, except that both panel 40 and panel 45 are placed at an optimal angle (which reflects more sunlight onto the panel). In this case, panel 45 produces 1.56A and 20.8V, while panel 40 produces 1.60A and 20.6V. Thus, panel 45 produces 32.45W, while panel 40 produces about 33W.

Fig. 23 shows a two solar panel system similar to that of fig. 21, except that both panel 40 and panel 45 are placed at a 90 degree angle. Panel 40 produces 1.8A and panel 45 produces 1.54A. Therefore, when the angle is not optimal, the reflective panel having the refraction-reflection material on the top thereof generates more current, and the reflective panel such as a mirror alone requires the optimal angle, otherwise the generated current is reduced. Thus, the 90 degree angle between the solar panel and the material is not the optimal angle for solar power generation using the solar panel and the mirror booster.

Although studies have shown that solar panel output can be increased by as much as 30% by adding reflectors, it turns out that the use of refractive-reflective sheets such as lenticular lens-like sheets can achieve almost 57% improvement in doubling the results, as shown in the systems of fig. 20A and 20B. It should be noted that the panels in these figures are at a 90 degree angle relative to the refractor-reflector sheet lying on the ground. Therefore, the refraction-reflection sheet does not have an optimal angle for reflection, which is generally used for research. From the experiments of fig. 20 to 23 it was also determined that 90 degrees is not the optimal angle for orienting the solar panel relative to the mirror booster.

From the rear of the solar panel, it was verified that a reflective panel such as a mirror reflects only sunlight from a central point. However, since the reflective panel has a refraction-reflection sheet such as a lenticular sheet on the top thereof, the reflection of sunlight is not as intense as a mirror but is spread over the panel. Thus, it provides lower intensity but spreads over a larger surface area, which provides more usable sunlight for the solar panel than could otherwise be achieved using the mirror alone.

Additionally, it was found that the angle of light reflected by a refractive-reflective material placed on top of the mirror was lower than that observed using the mirror alone. As the panel is oriented closer to 90 degrees, the current increases from 1.56A to 1.76A. However, orienting the panel in this manner (closer to 90 degrees) causes the current to decrease from 1.62A to 1.54A when only mirrors are used. While the optimal angle is variable due to time and location, it is not limited to 90 degrees and may be different from the optimal angle for the solar panel that is observed using standard calculations without any magnification.

The conclusion is that improvements can be made if the refractive-reflective material and the reflective panels below it are stiffer to produce a more uniform reflectance. Otherwise, irregularities in the reflection may be observed due to irregularities in the surface of the reflective panel and/or the refractive-reflective surface placed on top of the reflective panel. Alternatively, the rigid refractive-reflective sheet may have a reflective coating applied thereto to produce a uniform reflectance of sunlight on the surface of the solar panel.

Fig. 24A is a front perspective view of a solar panel having a plurality of refraction-reflection cylinders according to yet another embodiment of the present invention. In this embodiment, 3 refraction-reflection cylinders 1100 are placed in front of the solar panel 40. The cylinder 1100 may comprise rectangular sheets of refraction-reflection that are rolled to form a cylinder and held in that shape by an adhesive. As an example, a lenticular lens sheet may be rolled into a cylindrical tube 1100. Sunlight 10 reflects from the circular outer surface of the cylinder 1100 and is received by the solar panel 40. Solar panel 40 produces more power because it receives both direct and reflected sunlight. It is contemplated that more than three cylinders 1100 may be used. By balancing cost and solar power enhancement, the optimal number and size of the refraction-reflection cylinders can be determined. The cylindrical shape advantageously provides robustness and durability. Additionally, debris will not accumulate on the cylinder 1100 and may deflect from the outer curved surface of the cylinder. The inside curved surface of the cylinder 1100 may also be coated with a reflective material to reflect more sunlight 10 onto the panel 40. The cylinder may also be perforated for self-cleaning, e.g. by rain.

FIG. 24B depicts a cylinder 1102 having an outer lateral reflective surface. The reflective cylinder 1102 may be made of paperboard and coated with a glossy metallic substance or have an aluminum foil adhered to the outer lateral surface thereof. As will be seen below, the dimensions of the cylinder 1102 may be adapted to the interior of the cylinder 1100.

Fig. 25A is a system for comparing the performance of a solar panel 40 having a refraction-reflection cylinder 1100 placed in front of it with a conventional (control) solar panel 45. The output current seen from panel 40 is 1.33A, with panel 40 having 8 refractive-reflective cylinders or lenticular cylinders 1100 placed in front of and near the lower edge of panel 40. The increase in output current is about 13.5% compared to the output current of the solar panel 45. Fig. 25B shows voltage measurements for the system of fig. 25A, and the measurements indicate that the voltages produced by panels 40 and 45 are substantially similar.

Fig. 26A is a system similar to that of fig. 25, wherein a refractive-reflective cylinder 1100 is additionally fitted with a cylinder 1102 having an external reflective coating, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. With the addition of a cylinder 1102 with an outer reflective coating inside eight refractive-reflective cylinders 1100, the output power of the solar panel 40 was observed to be 1.40A. Thus, the output power is increased by adding a reflective panel to reflect additional solar rays further onto the surface of the solar panel 40. Fig. 26B shows voltage measurements for the system of fig. 26A, and the measurements indicate that the voltages produced by panels 40 and 45 are substantially similar.

FIG. 27A is a perspective view of a system for comparing the performance of a solar panel 40 having a refraction-reflection cylinder 1100 positioned in front of and proximate to the lower edge of solar panel 40 as shown in FIG. 24 with a solar panel having a refraction-reflection sheet 100 positioned in front of and proximate to the lower edge of solar panel 45. The output current of solar panel 40 was observed to be 1.33A, while the output current of solar panel 45 was observed to be 1.30A. Considering that only eight cylinders are used, but more cylinders can be added, it is contemplated that increasing the number of cylinders can also increase the output current of the panel 40. Fig. 27B shows voltage measurements for the system of fig. 27A (also having eight cylinders) and indicates that the voltages generated by panels 40 and 45 are substantially similar.

FIG. 28 is a perspective view of a system of two solar panels. A transparent explosion-proof shield 400 having a refraction-reflection sheet 100 placed on top thereof is placed in front of the panel 40 and near the lower edge of the panel 40 for reflecting the sunlight 10 onto the panel 40. The measured current from panel 40 was 1.49A, while the measured current from panel 45 was 1.21A. Thus, the curved explosion-proof shield together with the refraction-reflection sheet 100 increases the output current by 23%.

Fig. 29 is a perspective view of a system similar to that of fig. 28, but featuring an additional riot shield 410 and a catadioptric sheet 110 placed thereon, wherein both the shield 410 and the sheet 110 are disposed above the top edge of the panel 40 and oriented to reflect solar rays onto the panel 40. The current observed from panel 40 is 1.72A, which is about 42% higher than the 1.21A produced by panel 45.

Fig. 30 is a perspective view of a system similar to that of fig. 28, but additionally having a reflective panel 500 placed under the blast shield 400. The output current observed by the panel 40 is 1.55A, which is 28% higher than the 1.21A current produced by the panel 45. Compared to fig. 28, the reflective panel 500, such as a mirror, placed under the anti-riot shield, causes more solar rays to impinge on the panel, and thus causes the panel 40 to generate more current.

FIG. 31 is a perspective view of a system similar to that of FIG. 30, but additionally having two upstanding refraction-reflection sheets 200 placed on both sides of the solar panel 40 and oriented for reflecting solar rays onto the panel 40. With this arrangement, the current generated by panel 40 is 1.90A, 57% higher when compared to 1.21A generated by panel 45. Thus, the addition of upstanding flakes 200 depicted as linear lenticular lens-like sheets causes a significant increase in output current.

FIG. 32 is a perspective view of a system similar to that of FIG. 31, except that two upright reflective panels 500 are used, each having a refraction-reflection sheet 200 mounted on top thereof. Since the test was conducted when the sun was not at its peak intensity, the panel 45 produced only 0.99A. However, under the same solar conditions, panel 40 produces 1.92A. This represents a 94% increase in the generated current by using a riot shield with a refractive-reflective shield on top of it, a reflective sheet such as a mirror underneath it, and two upstanding refractive-reflective sheets such as linear lenticular sheets 200. When the test (not shown) is repeated near noon with more intense solar illumination, an 103.25% increase in power was observed for panel 40 over panel 45.

Fig. 33 is a perspective view of a system of solar panels with reflectors on four sides of the solar panel 40. Panel 45 is a control panel without any object in front of it. The solar panel 40 has a refractive-reflective sheet 500 in the form of a linear lenticular sheet 550, coated with a reflective coating, placed in front of and adjacent to the lower edge of the solar panel 40 for reflecting solar rays on the solar panel 40. Additionally, two upright reflective panels 500 having the refraction-reflection sheet 200 placed thereon are placed on both sides of the solar panel 40 and oriented to reflect solar rays on the solar panel 40. Further, a third reflective panel 500 having the refraction-reflective sheet 200 is positioned above the solar panel 40 and oriented to reflect solar rays on the solar panel 40. The current produced by the solar panel was found to be 2.88A compared to 1.21A produced by the solar panel 45. This corresponds to a 138% increase in the output current. For example, by changing the angle between the solar panel and the refraction-reflection sheet 500, the output current is increased up to 142% (not shown).

Fig. 34 to 39 are schematic views depicting the solar panel 40 surrounded by 4 linear lenticular lens-shaped sheets 100. In fig. 34, the lenticular sheet is oriented such that the linear lenticular lenses extend substantially perpendicular to the surface of the solar panel. This has been shown to give better output current results and is considered to be the best polarisation for the lens. Fig. 35 is similar to fig. 34, except that the lenticular sheet 100 is curved in a convex manner with respect to the solar panel. Fig. 36 is similar to fig. 34, except that the lenticular sheet 100 is curved in a concave manner with respect to the solar panel. Fig. 37 is similar to fig. 34, except that two lenticular sheets are convex and two are concave. Fig. 38 depicts a solar panel 40 surrounded by 4 linear lenticular sheets 100 oriented in a less-than-optimally polarized manner. In this case, the linear lenticular lenses on the lenticular sheet extend parallel to the surface of the solar panel 40. Fig. 39 is similar to fig. 38 except that the lenticular sheet 100 is convex with respect to the solar panel 40.

Fig. 40A is a perspective view of a system of solar panels similar to the system of fig. 33, but using only three reflective panels. A reflective panel 500, such as a mirror, having a lenticular sheet 100 on its top is disposed near the bottom edge of the solar panel 45 and to its sides. Additionally, two upright reflective panels, such as mirrors, having a lenticular sheet 200 on top thereof are placed on either side of the solar panel 45 for reflecting solar rays on the solar panel 45. It has been observed that panel 40 produces 26.9V, while panel 45 produces 25.0V. The voltage drop can be attributed to the panel heating due to additional solar rays falling on the panel. The current generated by panel 45 is 0.63A, while the current of panel 40 is only 0.24A. Control panel 40 produced 0.24A by 26.9V to 6.456W. The panel 45 with three reflective panels produced 0.63A by 25.0V-15.75W. Thus, the power generated when using three reflective panels as described herein is 2.44 times the power generated in a control panel without a reflective panel at all.

The system described in fig. 40A and 40B is then used in conjunction with the application of the shadow of an object to the panel 45 to see if the effects of the shadow can be completely offset by using the three reflective panels described above. This system and both voltage and current measurements are shown in fig. 41A and 41B. The voltage measured on control panel 40 was 26.8V, while the voltage on panel 45 was 24.8V. The voltage drop across the panel 45 is likely to be due to heating of the panel. The current generated by panel 45 was 0.44A compared to 0.24A generated by control panel 40. When comparing power, the control panel 40 had 0.24A 26.8V 6.432W. The panel 45 has 0.44A × 24.8V ═ 10.91W. Thus, not only is the effect of the shadow completely cancelled, but the output power of panel 45 is about 1.7 times the power of the control panel 40 with no shadow cast thereon.

Fig. 42 depicts a system of solar panels, wherein one panel 40 is surrounded by reflective panels from four sides. In front of and adjacent to the lower edge of the panel 40 is placed a transparent riot shield 400, the transparent riot shield 400 having a reflective panel such as a mirror 500 placed behind it. A similar explosion proof shield 400 and mirror 500 are held above the top edge of the solar panel 40, with the explosion proof shield 400 having a lenticular sheet of material 100 placed on top of it. On the left and right sides of the solar panel 40, upright mirrors 500 having a refraction-reflection sheet such as a linear lenticular sheet 100 are placed in front of the mirrors. The current measured from panel 40 was 3.34A, while the current measured from panel 45 was 1.23A. Therefore, by using a reflective panel as described, the output current of the solar panel can be increased almost twice.

Fig. 43 depicts a system of two thin film solar panels, where one panel 45 is surrounded by a reflective panel from 3 sides. A transparent explosion-proof shield 400 is held on the top edge of the panel 45, the explosion-proof shield 400 being covered with a refractive-reflective sheet such as a linear lenticular sheet 100 and having a reflective panel such as a mirror 500 behind it. An anti-riot shield having mirrors and lenticular lens-like sheeting is held at an optimum angle for reflecting solar rays onto the panel 45. The upstanding lenticular sheet 100 is placed on the left and right sides with a mirror 500 behind each of the lenticular sheet. The current seen from panel 45 is 0.78, which is three times the current of panel 40, with panel 40 having a current of 0.23A. With voltage considerations in mind, panel 40 produces 6.1W, while panel 45 produces about 19W, which is three times the power of panel 40.

The experiment of fig. 43 was also performed using a single crystal solar panel and no explosion protection cover on top. The panel 45 with the reflector produces 2.97A and 18.8V, so the power is about 56W. The solar panel 40 as a control panel produced 1.17A and 20.4V, so the power was about 24W. Thus, the power with the reflector is about 2.35 times the power without the reflector, but not exactly three times as much as with a thin film solar panel. This is due to the voltage drop caused by having a microcrystalline plate. Studies have shown that while both single crystal and thin film PV (also referred to as "amorphous solar panels") suffer from voltage drop due to overheating, thin film PV panels are better able to support heat and maintain higher voltages.

In another embodiment, two single crystal solar panels with reflectors and a control solar panel are used. Four reflectors were used: one explosion protection shield on top and one on the bottom with the mirror behind each shield and the lenticular lens sheet on top of each shield; and two upstanding mirrors, with lenticular lens-like sheets on the sides. The observed value for the control panel was 1.18A × 20.4V — 24.072W. And for a panel with a reflector: 3.59A × 18.8V ═ 67.492W. Although the output power for the solar panel with reflector is 2.8 times higher, it has not been fully tripled with the control panel. This confirms the earlier findings: the additional heat causes the voltage at the output of the single crystal plate to drop.

The performance of solar panels is typically in the range of 1000W/m2Measured at the optimum rating of solar energy. Such solar conditions are achievable: at the equator, at noon, under ideal clear sky conditions, and at a temperature of 25 degrees celsius. At mid-day at the equator, the sun is at a 90 degree angle to the earth's surface. Other regions of the world experience different angles of incidence of solar rays. For example, in Vancouver, Canada, 11.2.2018, the sun is at an angle of about 26 degrees, and the maximum solar intensity is only 400W/m at noon2. At an earlier time of day, about 10:40AM, experiments were performed using the arrangement shown in fig. 20A and 20B above but using a polycrystalline solar panel as depicted in fig. 44.

FIG. 44 depicts a system of polycrystalline solar panels 40 and 45 for performing solar testing. The panel 40 has three reflective panels 500 each covered with the refraction-reflection sheet 100. Panel 45 is a control panel. The solar rating is about 300W/m during that time of day2This is much lower than the 1000W/m discussed above2Optimal solar rating. The results show that panel 40 produced 21.5V 2.71A 58.26W, and panel 45 produced 21.9V 3.95A 86.50W. Thus, the amplified panel produced 48.47% more power. According to the information provided by the manufacturer on the panels, the maximum achievable power at 1000W/m2 (i.e. ideal solar conditions) when testing these panels under no-load conditions is: 21.85V open circuit voltage and 3.2A short circuit current. In other words, maximum work under ideal solar conditionsThe ratio is: about 21.85 × 3.2 ═ 70W. The amplified panel produced 86.50W under non-ideal solar conditions of only 300W/m2 and it was still about 23% higher than expected under ideal solar and load conditions. The cost of adding solar panels and materials compared to the additional power generated is insignificant.

FIG. 45 depicts a system similar to that of FIG. 20, wherein three refractor-reflector sheets are placed in front of and proximate to the lower edge of solar panel 40, with mirrors behind it; but also features additional vertical catadioptric sheets, each of which has a mirror behind it, placed on the left and right sides of the solar panel 40. The power generated by the panel 40 is: 20.7V 5.14A 106.40, while the power generated by control panel 45 was 21.6V 2.63A 56.81W. Thus, the amplified solar panel produces 1.87 times the power of the unamplified solar panel. Again, it should be noted that 106.4W observed with the enlarged panels is higher (in this case 50% higher) than the rating of the manufacturers described above for these panels under ideal solar conditions.

The above finding is of great importance because in many cities around the world the adoption of solar panels is not high, mainly because the power generated is relatively low, so that it takes a long time to recover the cost of the system of solar panels. This varies and depends on location, sunlight time and sunlight angle. The closer the city is to the equator, the better these conditions are obtained. However, the above-described method of significantly amplifying the output power of a solar panel means that the cost of a system of solar panels can be more quickly recovered from the power generated. Thus, many cities in the world may become viable markets for solar panels.

In one experiment performed using the system of fig. 40A and 40B, the control panel 40 had 20.2V 1.20A-24.4W, while the panel 45 with reflector had 18.4V 2.21A-40.66W (about 68% more power). The 1.8V difference between the control panel 40 and the panel 45 is due to overheating caused by the amplifying system of the reflector. By measuring the temperature for each of the panels, it was found that panel 40 was at 124 degrees fahrenheit and panel 45 was at 187.5 degrees fahrenheit. This may allow for improved solar hot water heating, or even for combined solar panels with a solar heating system mounted behind them to both help cool the solar panels and at the same time heat the water.

Fig. 46 is a perspective view of a system similar to that of fig. 40A and 40B, but additionally having a refraction-reflection sheet 130 placed over the enlarged solar panel 45 to act as a cover. For the system used, the control panel 40 generated power of 20.2V 1.20A 24.4W. The enlarged panel 45 produces 19.2V 2.06 ═ 39.55W. The temperature of the control panel is about 118F and the temperature of the magnified panel 45 is about 170F. However, removing the refractive-reflective cover sheet 130 (not shown) from the enlarged solar panel 45 causes the temperature to rise to 200F. At the same time, removing the cover resulted in an amplified panel power of 18.9 × 2.47 — 46.7W. Thus, the cover 130 has a substantial effect on the temperature, causing it to drop in temperature by about 30 degrees Fahrenheit compared to no cover. The cover also reduced power by about 18% (39.55W versus 46.7W), while still achieving a substantial power boost of about 63% compared to the control panel. The tradeoff between power output and temperature control may allow the solar panel to achieve a longer life with the lens cover, as overheating may cause the battery to degrade over time. It may also limit hot spots of the heavily amplified system.

Fig. 47 shows a system similar to that of fig. 46A and 46B, but in which no reflective-refractive sheet 100 is placed on the mirror 500. Instead, the panel 45 is surrounded by a reflective panel or mirror 500 and has a single refractive-reflective sheet, such as a linear lenticular cover sheet 130, placed in front of the panel 45. Making a temperature reading before placing the cover sheet 130 in front of the face sheet 45 (not shown) results in a temperature reading of 213 degrees fahrenheit. Placing the cover sheet 130 in front of the panel 45 reduces the temperature to about 163 degrees Fahrenheit by about 50 degrees Fahrenheit. For the control panel 40, the temperature was 115 degrees fahrenheit. The control panel 40 without reflector has a power of about 20.2V 1.04A-21W. The enlarged panel 45 without the cover 130 produced about 18.8V 2.02W (80% more power than the control panel). Wherein the cover 130 is placed in front of the solar panel 45 with output power: about 19.2V 1.78A 34W (54% more power than the control panel). The enlarged panel 45 with the cover 130 produced only 4W less (about 11%) than the panel without the cover. However, the improvement in temperature reduction is about 50 degrees Fahrenheit. Thus, the system of FIG. 47 has several advantages. First, the cost is reduced since only one lenticular sheet 130 is used instead of three when compared to the system of fig. 46. Second, the temperature drop of up to 50 degrees is significant and contributes to the life of the solar panel, as the cell is less likely to burn in the short term. Third, the power reduction is slightly due to the temperature reduction, which is about 11%.

Fig. 48 shows a system similar to that of fig. 47, but additionally with a fourth mirror 500 placed above the top edge of the panel 45 for additionally reflecting sunlight onto the panel 45. This arrangement increases the current to 2.37A.

While the improvement is significant when using 4 reflectors around the solar panel, it is not practical in some cases to add such reflectors. For example, there may be no space around the solar panel for side reflectors. Furthermore, large reflectors will create shadows as the sun changes direction throughout the day. This results in a concept with smaller side and (optionally top) reflecting devices, e.g. so that their shadows do not interfere with adjacent panels. In fig. 49, a side reflector is added to the solar panel 45. The side reflectors are made of strips of wood or other suitable material. The slats are covered with a reflective material such as mylar or foil 700 and then with a best polarized refractive-reflective material 710. The slats are then attached to the sides of the solar panel 45 and oriented for reflecting additional sunlight onto the solar panel 45. In front of the panel 45 and on the ground near the lower edge, four reflective panels such as mirrors 500 covered with a refraction-reflection sheet such as a linear lenticular sheet 100 are placed near the lower edge of the panel 45. The observed power measurement was 21.3V 2.68A-57.08W for control panel 40 and 20.9 x 40.06-84.85W for magnified panel 45. Fig. 50 is similar to fig. 49, but with the addition of a similar third slat 700 having a reflective material, and the slat 700 is covered with a refractive-reflective material 710 such as a linear lenticular sheet with optimal polarization. In the case of 3 slats, the output power for the panel after amplification is 91.12W, whereas the output power for the control panel is about 57W as was the case with the setup in fig. 49. Thus, the addition of the third slat produced an 8% increase in magnification over the two slats (84.85W). These three strips provided an additional 12.84 watts (16% more power) [91.12 watts ] compared to the enlarged panel [78.28 watts ] without the strips in the test.

Fig. 51 depicts a system for comparing power amplification of two solar panels using two different configurations. The panel 40 has a reflective panel 500 such as a mirror placed in front of it and near its lower edge, the reflective panel 500 being covered with a refractive-reflective sheet 600 such as a lenticular sheet. The panel 45 has a reflective panel 500 placed in front of it near its lower edge, the reflective panel 500 having a lenticular sheet (not visible) and a diffraction grating sheet 900 placed on top of the lenticular sheet. The diffraction grating sheet 900 used is an imprinted HOE biaxial sheet. Panel 45 produces a current of 2.9A, while panel 40 produces a current of 2.66A. The voltage for both was substantially unchanged, about 22V. Thus, the power for panel 40 is about 58W, while the power for panel 45 is about 63W. Thus, the addition of a diffraction grating produced a 9% increase in power output.

What is observed with diffraction gratings is that they spread the reflection of the sun over a much larger area. For biaxial sheeting, the sun spreads up and down and in the left and right direction. The spreading of the sun in all directions avoids the need to track the sun and optimize the reflection angle between the sheet and the panel as is the case with linear lenticular sheet.

Although only one diffraction grating sheet was tested, it is expected that adding more diffraction grating sheets to the setup of fig. 51 will improve the solar power amplification of the solar panel.

In 2018, 12 and 6 months, near Vancouver Columbia province, when the maximum solar radiation is about 300W/m2A test was performed using a biaxial diffraction grating in combination with a lenticular lens placed on a reflective panel. It is expected that higher solar radiation levels in the spring and summer will increase the percentage of potential power output above the level measured at the solar radiation nadir for that year.

It is also contemplated to combine the linear lenticular sheet, the diffraction grating and the reflective panel into one material. In one embodiment, a linear lenticular lens will have a coating of diffraction gratings on its lens side and a reflective coating on the smooth side opposite the lens side.

In another embodiment, there are three separate materials: a diffraction grating sheet, a linear lenticular lens, and a reflective panel such as a mirror. A diffraction grating may be placed on top of the linear lenticular lens. Alternatively, in another embodiment, the diffraction grating may be placed below the linear lenticular lens but above the mirror.

In yet another embodiment, two diffraction grating layers may be used; one on top of the linear lenticular lens and one between the linear lenticular lens and the reflective panel.

Although the various refractive-reflective sheets presented herein are shown as rectangular in shape and generally flat, other configurations are contemplated. For example, the refraction-reflection sheet may form a concave disk, a hemisphere, or a curved rectangle for directing sunlight from different angles to the solar panel.

Although most embodiments utilize a refractive-reflective sheet such as a linear lenticular sheet, similar results can be obtained by using a diffraction grating sheet instead of a refractive-reflective sheet.

Although the presented embodiments show a fixed solar panel, both the solar panel and the refraction-reflection sheet can be moved individually or both on a rotating platform or other equivalent device to track the sunlight from different directions at different times of the day or in different seasons. Alternatively, the catadioptric sheets may be directed at the sun at key times to improve solar collection. For example, the sheet may be placed and oriented such that the sheet is in the path of the sunlight only when the sunlight is in the path containing the object that would generate the shadow.

Although the embodiments show thin film solar panels, single crystal solar cells, polycrystalline solar cells, the presented methods are also applicable to other types of solar panels, such as solar roof tiles or other forms of solar radiation collectors.

Although a single panel is shown, the presented method is also applicable to multiple solar panels mounted on a tower. The refractive-reflective sheet placed between adjacent towers helps to scatter and minimize the shadow of one tower on an adjacent tower, thus amplifying the power output of the adjacent tower.

The above-described embodiments are intended to be examples of the present invention and alterations and modifications may be effected thereto, by those of skill in the art, without departing from the scope of the invention which is defined solely by the claims appended hereto.

73页详细技术资料下载
上一篇:一种医用注射器针头装配设备
下一篇:H桥功率放大器布置

网友询问留言

已有0条留言

还没有人留言评论。精彩留言会获得点赞!

精彩留言,会给你点赞!