阅读说明：本技术 实验室评价方法、存储介质和电子设备 (Laboratory evaluation method, storage medium, and electronic device ) 是由 刘庆肖 于 2019-08-29 设计创作，主要内容包括：本发明提供的实验室评价方法、存储介质和电子设备,其中的方法包括：获取待评价实验室的信息数据,所述信息数据包括至少一种评价指标数据；根据所述待评价实验室的每一种评价指标数据得到所述待评价实验室每一种评价指标对应的评价结果；根据所述待评价试验的每一种评价指标的评价结果得到所述待评价实验室的综合评价结果。本发明提供的以上方案,通过为每一待评价实验室的相关信息分别进行评价,从而能够得到每一待评价实验室的综合评价结果。能够为医务工作人员在选择实验室时提供客观地、量化的理论依据,从而能够提高医务工作人员在需要进行检测时选择实验室的效率。(The invention provides a laboratory evaluation method, a storage medium and an electronic device, wherein the method comprises the following steps: acquiring information data of a laboratory to be evaluated, wherein the information data comprises at least one evaluation index data; obtaining an evaluation result corresponding to each evaluation index of the laboratory to be evaluated according to each evaluation index data of the laboratory to be evaluated; and obtaining a comprehensive evaluation result of the laboratory to be evaluated according to the evaluation result of each evaluation index of the test to be evaluated. According to the scheme provided by the invention, the relevant information of each laboratory to be evaluated is evaluated respectively, so that the comprehensive evaluation result of each laboratory to be evaluated can be obtained. The method can provide objective and quantitative theoretical basis for medical staff when selecting a laboratory, thereby improving the efficiency of selecting the laboratory when the medical staff needs to detect.)

1. A laboratory evaluation method, comprising the steps of:

Acquiring information data of a laboratory to be evaluated, wherein the information data comprises at least one evaluation index data;

Obtaining an evaluation result corresponding to each evaluation index of the laboratory to be evaluated according to each evaluation index data of the laboratory to be evaluated;

and obtaining a comprehensive evaluation result of the laboratory to be evaluated according to the evaluation result of each evaluation index of the test to be evaluated.

2. The laboratory evaluation method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

acquiring a detection requirement keyword, and acquiring a first pre-estimated detection item according to the detection requirement keyword;

obtaining a first estimated evaluation result Rw of the laboratory to be evaluated for the first estimated detection item according to each evaluation index data of the laboratory to be evaluated;

And obtaining a first comprehensive evaluation result matched with the detection requirement keyword according to the comprehensive evaluation result and the first pre-estimated evaluation result Rw.

3. The laboratory evaluation method according to claim 2, wherein in the step of obtaining a first comprehensive evaluation result matching the detection requirement keyword from the comprehensive evaluation result and the first predicted evaluation result Rw, the first comprehensive evaluation result R1 is obtained by:

R1＝W×Rw+R；

Wherein W is a weight value assigned to the first pre-estimated evaluation result.

4. The laboratory evaluation method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

Acquiring user information, and acquiring a second pre-estimated detection item according to the user information;

obtaining a second pre-estimated evaluation result Rd of the laboratory to be evaluated for the second pre-estimated detection item according to each evaluation index data of the laboratory to be evaluated;

And obtaining a second comprehensive evaluation result matched with the user information according to the comprehensive evaluation result and the second pre-estimated evaluation result Rd.

5. The laboratory evaluation method according to claim 4, wherein in the step of obtaining a second comprehensive evaluation result matching the user information from the comprehensive evaluation result and the second predicted evaluation result Rd, a second comprehensive evaluation result R2 is obtained by:

R2＝D×Rd+R；

And D is a weight value distributed to the second estimation evaluation result.

6. The laboratory evaluation method of any one of claims 1 to 5, further comprising the steps of:

Acquiring information data of a laboratory to be evaluated, wherein the information data comprises at least one evaluation index data, and the information data comprises at least one of qualification data, material submission data, report cycle data, experiment success rate data, reading service data, training service data, report information structured data and popularization data of the laboratory to be evaluated;

the method comprises the following steps of obtaining an evaluation result corresponding to each evaluation index of the laboratory to be evaluated according to each evaluation index data of the laboratory to be evaluated:

the qualification data comprises the type and the quantity of the qualification certificate of the laboratory to be evaluated, and a qualification evaluation result Rq of the laboratory to be evaluated is obtained according to the type and the quantity of the qualification certificate;

The material submission data comprises the types of the submission materials of the laboratory to be evaluated, and the submission material evaluation result Rm of the laboratory to be evaluated is obtained according to the comprehensiveness of the types of the submission materials;

the report period data comprise the time length required by the generation of the experimental report of the laboratory to be evaluated, and the report period evaluation result Rc of the laboratory to be evaluated is obtained according to the time length;

the experiment success rate data comprises the probability of successfully providing a detection report in the historical experiment of the laboratory to be evaluated, and an experiment success rate evaluation result Rs of the experiment to be evaluated is obtained according to the probability;

the interpretation service data comprises the number of ways of interpretation of the report of the laboratory to be evaluated and the number of interpretation knowledge points of the report, and an interpretation service evaluation result Ri of the laboratory to be evaluated is obtained according to the number of ways and the number of knowledge points;

the training service data comprises the type of a training service provider of the laboratory to be evaluated, and a training service evaluation result Rt of the laboratory to be evaluated is obtained according to the type of the provider;

The report information structured data comprise the number of key information contained in a report provided by the laboratory to be evaluated, and a report information structured evaluation result Rr of the laboratory to be evaluated is obtained according to the number of the key information;

the promotion data comprise promotion material data types and numbers of the laboratory to be evaluated, and promotion material evaluation results Rp of the laboratory to be evaluated are obtained according to the promotion material data types and numbers.

7. The laboratory evaluation method according to claim 6, wherein in the step of obtaining the comprehensive evaluation result R of the laboratory to be evaluated according to the evaluation result of each evaluation index of the test to be evaluated, the comprehensive evaluation result R of the laboratory to be evaluated is obtained according to the evaluation result of each evaluation index of the test to be evaluated obtained by obtaining the evaluation result of the laboratory to be evaluated according to the following model:

R＝a1×Rq+a2×Rm+a3×Rp+a4×Rc+a5×Rs+a6×Ri+a7×Rt+a8×Rr；

wherein, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7 and a8 are weight values assigned to the respective evaluation indexes, respectively.

8. A storage medium having stored therein program instructions, which when read by a computer, perform the laboratory evaluation method of any one of claims 1 to 7.

9. an electronic device comprising at least one processor and at least one memory, wherein the at least one memory stores program instructions, and wherein the at least one processor reads the program instructions and performs the laboratory evaluation method of any of claims 1-7.

Technical Field

the present invention relates to the field of information processing technologies, and in particular, to a laboratory evaluation method, a storage medium, and an electronic device.

background

in clinical medicine, professional medical tests are frequently required for sampling samples, and qualified laboratories are required for each type of medical test at present. However, when there is a need for detection, it is difficult for medical staff to quickly find a laboratory that best matches their own needs from a plurality of available laboratories.

therefore, there is a need for a solution that can be evaluated objectively and quantitatively in a laboratory, and can provide a basis for medical staff to select a laboratory.

Disclosure of Invention

The invention provides a laboratory evaluation method, a storage medium and electronic equipment, and solves the technical problem that no technical scheme for objectively and quantitatively evaluating a laboratory exists in the prior art.

Therefore, the invention provides a laboratory evaluation method, which comprises the following steps:

Acquiring information data of a laboratory to be evaluated, wherein the information data comprises at least one evaluation index data;

Obtaining an evaluation result corresponding to each evaluation index of the laboratory to be evaluated according to each evaluation index data of the laboratory to be evaluated;

And obtaining a comprehensive evaluation result R of the laboratory to be evaluated according to the evaluation result of each evaluation index of the test to be evaluated.

Optionally, the laboratory evaluation method further includes the following steps:

acquiring a detection requirement keyword, and acquiring a first pre-estimated detection item according to the detection requirement keyword;

Obtaining a first estimated evaluation result Rw of the laboratory to be evaluated for the first estimated detection item according to each evaluation index data of the laboratory to be evaluated;

and obtaining a first comprehensive evaluation result matched with the detection requirement keyword according to the comprehensive evaluation result and the first pre-estimated evaluation result Rw.

optionally, in the laboratory evaluation method, in the step of obtaining a first comprehensive evaluation result matching the detection requirement keyword according to the comprehensive evaluation result and the first pre-estimated evaluation result Rw, the first comprehensive evaluation result R1 is obtained as follows:

R1＝W×R+R；

wherein W is a weight value assigned to the first pre-estimated evaluation result.

optionally, the laboratory evaluation method further includes the following steps:

acquiring user information, and acquiring a second pre-estimated detection item according to the user information;

Obtaining a second pre-estimated evaluation result Rd of the laboratory to be evaluated for the second pre-estimated detection item according to each evaluation index data of the laboratory to be evaluated;

And obtaining a second comprehensive evaluation result matched with the user information according to the comprehensive evaluation result and the second pre-estimated evaluation result Rd.

Optionally, in the laboratory evaluation method, in the step of obtaining a second comprehensive evaluation result matching the user information according to the comprehensive evaluation result and the second pre-estimated evaluation result Rd, a second comprehensive evaluation result R2 is obtained as follows:

R2＝D×R+R；

and D is a weight value distributed to the second estimation evaluation result.

optionally, the laboratory evaluation method further includes the following steps:

acquiring information data of a laboratory to be evaluated, wherein the information data comprises at least one evaluation index data, and the information data comprises at least one of qualification data, material submission data, report cycle data, experiment success rate data, reading service data, training service data, report information structured data and popularization data of the laboratory to be evaluated;

The method comprises the following steps of obtaining an evaluation result corresponding to each evaluation index of the laboratory to be evaluated according to each evaluation index data of the laboratory to be evaluated:

the qualification data comprises the type and the quantity of the qualification certificate of the laboratory to be evaluated, and a qualification evaluation result Rq of the laboratory to be evaluated is obtained according to the type and the quantity of the qualification certificate;

the material submission data comprises the types of the submission materials of the laboratory to be evaluated, and the submission material evaluation result Rm of the laboratory to be evaluated is obtained according to the comprehensiveness of the types of the submission materials;

the report period data comprise the time length required by the generation of the experimental report of the laboratory to be evaluated, and the report period evaluation result Rc of the laboratory to be evaluated is obtained according to the time length;

the experiment success rate data comprises the probability of successfully providing a detection report in the historical experiment of the laboratory to be evaluated, and an experiment success rate evaluation result Rs of the experiment to be evaluated is obtained according to the probability;

The interpretation service data comprises the number of ways of interpretation of the report of the laboratory to be evaluated and the number of interpretation knowledge points of the report, and an interpretation service evaluation result Ri of the laboratory to be evaluated is obtained according to the number of ways and the number of knowledge points;

The training service data comprises the type of a training service provider of the laboratory to be evaluated, and a training service evaluation result Rt of the laboratory to be evaluated is obtained according to the type of the provider;

The report information structured data comprise the number of key information contained in a report provided by the laboratory to be evaluated, and a report information structured evaluation result Rr of the laboratory to be evaluated is obtained according to the number of the key information;

the promotion data comprise promotion material data types and numbers of the laboratory to be evaluated, and promotion material evaluation results Rp of the laboratory to be evaluated are obtained according to the promotion material data types and numbers.

optionally, in the laboratory evaluation method, in the step of obtaining the comprehensive evaluation result R of the laboratory to be evaluated according to the evaluation result of each evaluation index of the test to be evaluated, the comprehensive evaluation result R of the laboratory to be evaluated is obtained according to the evaluation result of each evaluation index of the test to be evaluated obtained according to the following model:

R＝a1×Rq+a2×Rm+a3×Rp+a4×Rc+a5×Rs+a6×Ri+a7×Rt+a8×Rr；

Wherein, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7 and a8 are weight values assigned to the respective evaluation indexes, respectively.

the invention also provides a storage medium, wherein the storage medium stores program instructions, and a computer reads the program instructions and executes the laboratory evaluation method.

the invention also provides an electronic device comprising at least one processor and at least one memory, wherein the at least one memory stores program instructions, and the at least one processor reads the program instructions and then performs the laboratory evaluation method described in any one of the above.

Compared with the prior art, the technical scheme provided by the invention at least has the following beneficial effects:

The invention provides a laboratory evaluation method, a storage medium and an electronic device, wherein the method comprises the following steps: acquiring information data of a laboratory to be evaluated, wherein the information data comprises at least one evaluation index data; obtaining an evaluation result corresponding to each evaluation index of the laboratory to be evaluated according to each evaluation index data of the laboratory to be evaluated; and obtaining a comprehensive evaluation result R of the laboratory to be evaluated according to the evaluation result of each evaluation index of the test to be evaluated. According to the scheme provided by the invention, the relevant information of each laboratory to be evaluated is evaluated respectively, so that the comprehensive evaluation result of each laboratory to be evaluated can be obtained. The method can provide objective and quantitative theoretical basis for medical staff when selecting a laboratory, thereby improving the efficiency of selecting the laboratory when the medical staff needs to detect.

Drawings

The preferred embodiments of the present invention will hereinafter be described in detail to facilitate understanding of the objects and advantages of the invention, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a laboratory evaluation method according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a laboratory evaluation method according to another embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a flow chart of a laboratory evaluation method according to yet another embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 4 is a schematic diagram of a hardware connection structure of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Detailed Description

the embodiments of the present invention will be further described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the description of the present invention, it should be noted that the terms "center", "upper", "lower", "left", "right", "vertical", "horizontal", "inner", "outer", etc., indicate orientations or positional relationships based on the orientations or positional relationships shown in the drawings, and are only for convenience of description of the present invention, and do not indicate or imply that the device or assembly referred to must have a specific orientation, be constructed and operated in a specific orientation, and thus, should not be construed as limiting the present invention. Furthermore, the terms "first," "second," and "third" are used for descriptive purposes only and are not to be construed as indicating or implying relative importance. Wherein the terms "first position" and "second position" are two different positions.

in the description of the present invention, it should be noted that, unless otherwise explicitly specified or limited, the terms "mounted," "connected," and "connected" are to be construed broadly, e.g., as meaning either a fixed connection, a removable connection, or an integral connection; can be mechanically or electrically connected; the two components can be directly connected or indirectly connected through an intermediate medium, and the two components can be communicated with each other. The specific meanings of the above terms in the present invention can be understood in specific cases to those skilled in the art.

The technical solutions in the following embodiments provided in the present invention may be combined with each other unless contradictory to each other, and the technical features thereof may be replaced with each other.