阅读说明：本技术 半自动机器人耳蜗植入手术 (Semi-automatic robot cochlear implant surgery ) 是由 马利克·波拉克 于 2019-03-20 设计创作，主要内容包括：本文描述了用于监视耳蜗植入手术的布置。在将耳蜗植入电极阵列通过手术插入到患者耳蜗中期间,基于将用于当前位于患者耳蜗中的给定插入深度处的至少一个电极触点的当前刺激响应数据与用于先前位于所述给定插入深度处的至少一个在先电极触点的在先刺激响应数据进行比较,为所述至少一个电极触点确定至少一个测量差值。当所述至少一个测量差值超过所限定的差值时,识别出潜在的创伤响应。(Arrangements for monitoring cochlear implant procedures are described herein. During surgical insertion of a cochlear implant electrode array into a cochlea of a patient, at least one measurement difference is determined for at least one electrode contact currently located at a given insertion depth in the cochlea of the patient based on comparing current stimulation response data for the at least one electrode contact with previous stimulation response data for at least one previous electrode contact previously located at the given insertion depth. When the at least one measured difference exceeds the defined difference, a potential wound response is identified.)

1. A surgical insertion system for controlling a cochlear implant procedure, the system comprising:

an insertion tool configured for inserting an electrode array into a cochlea of a patient, wherein the electrode array includes a plurality of electrode contacts distributed along an outer surface;

an insertion controller configured to control insertion of the electrode array by the insertion tool and having at least one hardware processor executing program instructions for:

determining at least one measured difference for at least one electrode contact currently located in a cochlea of a patient based on comparing current stimulation response data for the at least one electrode contact with previous stimulation response data for at least one previous electrode contact previously located at a given insertion depth,

Identifying a potential wound response when the at least one measured difference exceeds a defined difference, an

When the potential traumatic response is identified, surgical insertion is suspended.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the program instructions of the insertion controller further comprise:

re-determining the at least one measured difference at least once during a pause period, an

Resuming surgical insertion when the at least one measured difference no longer exceeds the defined difference.

3. The system of claim 2, wherein the program instructions of the insertion controller further comprise:

partially withdrawing the cochlear implant electrode array from the patient cochlea during the pause period.

4. The system of claim 2, wherein the program instructions of the insertion controller further comprise:

partially rotating a cochlear implant electrode array within a cochlea of a patient during the pause period.

5. The system of claim 2, wherein the program instructions of the insertion controller re-determine the at least one measured difference a plurality of times until the at least one measured difference no longer exceeds the defined difference.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein the program instructions of the insertion controller determine a plurality of measured differences for a plurality of electrode contacts currently located at a plurality of given insertion depths, and identify a potential traumatic response when any one of the plurality of measured differences exceeds a defined difference.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein the program instructions of the insertion controller determine the at least one measured difference based on comparing current stimulation response data to prior stimulation response data for a plurality of electrode contacts previously located at the given insertion depth.

8. A computer-implemented method of monitoring a cochlear implant procedure with at least one hardware-implemented computer processor, the method comprising:

during surgical insertion of a cochlear implant electrode array having a plurality of electrode contacts distributed along an outer surface into a cochlea of a patient, operating at least one hardware processor to execute program instructions for:

determining at least one measured difference for at least one electrode contact currently located at a given insertion depth in a cochlea of a patient based on comparing current stimulation response data for the at least one electrode contact with previous stimulation response data for at least one previous electrode contact previously located at the given insertion depth, and

When the at least one measured difference exceeds the defined difference, a potential wound response is identified.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the executed program instructions further comprise:

when the potential traumatic response is identified, suspending surgical insertion,

re-determining the at least one measured difference at least once during a pause period, an

Resuming surgical insertion when the at least one measured difference no longer exceeds the defined difference.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the executed program instructions further comprise:

partially withdrawing the cochlear implant electrode array from the patient cochlea during the pause period.

11. The method of claim 9, wherein the program instructions of the insertion controller further comprise:

partially rotating the cochlear implant electrode array within the cochlea of the patient during the pause period.

12. The method of claim 9, wherein the executed program instructions re-determine the at least one measured difference a plurality of times until the at least one measured difference no longer exceeds the defined difference.

13. The method of claim 8, wherein the executed program instructions determine a plurality of measured differences for a plurality of electrode contacts currently located at a plurality of given insertion depths, and identify a potential traumatic response when any of the plurality of measured differences exceeds a defined difference.

14. The method of claim 8, wherein the executed program instructions determine the at least one measured difference based on comparing current stimulation response data to prior stimulation response data for a plurality of electrode contacts previously located at the given insertion depth.

Technical Field

The present invention relates to cochlear implants, and more particularly, to a real-time system and method for detecting trauma created by surgical insertion of an electrode array into the cochlea.

Background

The normal human ear transmits sound through outer ear 101 as shown in fig. 1 to tympanic membrane (eardrum) 102, which tympanic membrane 102 displaces the bones (malleus, incus and stapes) of middle ear 103, which in turn vibrates the elliptical and circular window openings of cochlea 104. The cochlea 104 is an elongated catheter that is helically wound about its axis for approximately two and a half turns. The cochlea 104 includes an upper channel called the scala vestibuli and a lower channel called the scala tympani, which are connected by a cochlear duct. The scala tympani forms an upright spiral cone, the center of which is called the modiolar (modiolar), where the spiral ganglion cells of the acoustic nerve 113 reside. In response to received sounds transmitted by the middle ear 103, the fluid-filled cochlea 104 functions as a transducer to generate electrical pulses that are transmitted to the cochlear nerve 113, and ultimately to the brain.

Hearing is impaired when there is a problem with the ability to convert external sounds into meaningful action potentials along the neural matrix of the cochlea. In this case, the cochlear implant is an auditory prosthesis that uses implanted stimulation electrodes to bypass the acoustic conduction mechanisms of the ear and instead directly stimulate auditory nerve tissue through small currents provided by multiple electrode contacts distributed along the electrodes.

Fig. 1 also shows some components of a typical cochlear implant system, which includes an external microphone that provides an audio signal input to an external signal processing stage 111, at which external signal processing stage 111 various signal processing schemes can be implemented. The processed signals are then converted into a digital data format, such as a sequence of data frames, for transmission by the external transmitter coil 107 into the implanted stimulator 108. In addition to extracting the audio information, the implanted stimulator 108 also performs additional signal processing (e.g., error correction, pulse formation, etc.) and produces a stimulation pattern (based on the extracted audio information) that is sent over the connected lead 109 to an electrode array 110 that is inserted into the cochlea. Typically, the electrode array 110 includes a plurality of electrode contacts on its surface that provide selective stimulation of the cochlea 104. Stimulation is performed either to an external reference electrode contact outside the cochlea (i.e., a remote ground contact) or to another electrode contact of the array within the cochlea 104.

Insertion of the electrode array 110 requires surgery. Cochlear implant manufacturers provide surgeons with a variety of mechanical tools needed to implant the device. However, since the electrode array 110 is inserted into the cochlea 104 through the aperture, the surgeon cannot visually confirm the accurate placement of the electrode array 110 within the cochlea 104 itself. The insertion depth may be estimated by the portion of the electrode array 110 that has not been inserted into the cochlea 104, but in addition to this, the exact location of the contacts that have been inserted is unknown during surgery.

It is important to minimize trauma to the delicate tissues and structures of the cochlea during implantation of the electrode array. This can be determined by measuring the hearing preservation (hearing preservation). This ensures that minimal structural trauma occurs if hearing is preserved. By measuring intra-cochlear evoked potentials in response to acoustic or mechanical stimuli, the retention of hearing can be measured in a near real-time manner. This evoked potential can be recorded via electrode contacts implanted in patients of large groups with low frequency hearing, with the most sensitive frequency of this type of measurement being 500Hz to 1000 Hz.

Disclosure of Invention

Embodiments of the present invention relate to a surgical insertion system for controlling cochlear implant surgery. The insertion tool is configured for inserting an electrode array into a cochlea of a patient, wherein the electrode array includes a plurality of electrode contacts distributed along an outer surface. An insertion controller is configured to control insertion of the electrode array by the insertion tool and has at least one hardware processor executing program instructions for: (1) determining at least one measured difference for at least one electrode contact currently located in a cochlea of a patient based on comparing current stimulation response data for the at least one electrode contact with previous stimulation response data for at least one previous electrode contact previously located at the given insertion depth, (2) identifying a potential traumatic response when the at least one measured difference exceeds the defined difference, and (3) suspending surgical insertion when a potential traumatic response is identified.

In a further specific embodiment, the program instructions of the insertion controller further comprise re-determining the at least one measured difference at least once during a pause period, and resuming surgical insertion when the at least one measured difference no longer exceeds the defined difference. The program instructions of the insertion controller may also further include partially withdrawing the electrode array from within the patient's cochlea and/or partially rotating the electrode array within the patient's cochlea during the pause period. The program instructions of the insertion controller may re-determine the at least one measured difference a plurality of times until the at least one measured difference no longer exceeds the defined difference.

In certain embodiments, the program instructions of the insertion controller may determine a plurality of measured differences for a plurality of electrode contacts currently located at a plurality of given insertion depths, and identify a potential traumatic response when any one of the measured differences exceeds a defined difference. Additionally or alternatively, the program instructions of the insertion controller may determine the at least one measured difference based on comparing current stimulation response data to prior stimulation response data for a plurality of electrode contacts previously located at the given insertion depth.

Embodiments of the present invention also include a computer-implemented method of monitoring a cochlear implant procedure employing at least one hardware-implemented computer processor. During surgical insertion of a cochlear implant electrode array into a cochlea of a patient, operating the at least one hardware processor to execute program instructions for: (1) determine at least one measured difference for at least one electrode contact currently located at a given insertion depth in a cochlea of a patient based on comparing current stimulation response data for the at least one electrode contact with previous stimulation response data for at least one previous electrode contact previously located at the given insertion depth, and (2) identify a potential traumatic response when the at least one measured difference exceeds a defined difference.

In further particular embodiments, the executed program instructions may further include: the method may further include the steps of identifying a potential trauma response, pausing and/or slightly withdrawing (typically 1mm (to reach a point where the recording does not indicate any trauma) the surgical insertion, re-determining the at least one measured difference at least once during a pause period, and resuming the surgical insertion when the at least one measured difference no longer exceeds a defined difference.

The executed program instructions may re-determine the at least one measured difference a plurality of times until the at least one measured difference no longer exceeds the defined difference. The executed program instructions may determine a plurality of measured differences for a plurality of electrode contacts currently located at a plurality of given insertion depths, and identify a potential traumatic response when any of the measured differences exceeds a defined difference. Additionally or alternatively, the executed program instructions may determine the at least one measured difference based on comparing current stimulation response data to prior stimulation response data for a plurality of electrode contacts previously located at the given insertion depth.

Drawings

Fig. 1 shows a structure in a human ear with a cochlear implant system.

Fig. 2 illustrates various functional blocks in a system for surgical insertion of a cochlear implant electrode array according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Fig. 3A-3B illustrate various logical steps in the surgical insertion of a cochlear implant electrode array according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Fig. 4A to 4F show a process of inserting an electrode array according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Fig. 5 shows the withdrawal responses (rescored responses) of a series of electrode arrays during surgical insertion.

Detailed Description

There are mechanisms that can occur during insertion of the electrode into the cochlea of a patient that lead to hearing loss. By controlling the force and speed of insertion and the timely manipulation of the electrodes during insertion, most of these mechanisms can be avoided or reversed. Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention relate to an arrangement for creating an automated system for controlling cochlear implant surgery to navigate a surgeon during insertion of an electrode array into the cochlea. Determining, in real-time or near real-time while the array is inserted, at least one measured difference for at least one electrode contact currently located at a given insertion depth based on comparing current stimulation response data for the at least one electrode contact with previous stimulation response data for at least one previous electrode contact previously located at the given insertion depth. Then, when the at least one measured difference exceeds the defined difference, a potential traumatic response is identified, and surgical insertion is then suspended.

Fig. 2 shows various functional blocks in a system according to an embodiment of the invention, and fig. 3A-3B show various logical steps in a corresponding method of surgical insertion of a cochlear implant electrode array according to an embodiment of the invention. The insertion tool 202 is configured for inserting an electrode array 203 into a cochlea 205 of an implanted patient 206, the electrode array 203 having a plurality of electrode contacts 204 distributed along an outer surface thereof. The insertion controller 201 comprises at least one processor device of the implant hardware, which is controlled by software instructions to control the insertion process by instructing the insertion tool 202 to control the insertion of the electrode array 203. The program instructions executed by insertion controller 201 include program instructions to begin insertion of electrode array 301.

When the electrode array 203 begins to enter the cochlea 205 (fig. 4A), once the first electrode contact E1 enters the cochlea 205 and there is an effective impedance at that contact (fig. 4B), a stimulation response is measured and recorded for that contact at that location (step 302). The insertion controller 201 controls the insertion tool 202 to continue inserting the electrode array 203 into the cochlea 205 until the next contact E2 is entered (step 303, fig. 4C). The stimulus response is measured and recorded at its current location for each inserted contact (step 304).

The measurement and recording of the stimulus response may for example comprise a plurality of parameters, such as response delay, amplitude and/or frequency and phase of the evoked response signals, which may be recorded and evaluated continuously (where the electrode array is inserted at a controlled speed) or stepwise (where the electrode array 203 is inserted step by step into the cochlea 205 and the response measurement and recording is performed after each pause). The amplitude of the stimulus response signal should be greater than the noise floor. For example, the amplitude of the stimulus response signal may typically vary between about 0.2uV and up to 800uV recorded over a period of up to 8 seconds. Typical recording times are 5 to 8 seconds. In general, the larger the signal, the shorter the period of recording. The response measurement and recording can be successfully performed even in patients with relatively poor hearing, even in patients with a low frequency threshold of hearing loss at around 100 dB.

Then, in step 305, at least one measurement difference is determined for at least one electrode contact 204 currently located at a given insertion depth in the patient cochlea 205 based on comparing current stimulation response data for the at least one electrode contact 204 with previous stimulation response data for at least one previous electrode contact previously located at the given insertion depth. Basically, a difference value can generally be determined for each electrode contact for which one or more other electrode contacts previously existed at the same location.

More specifically, when the electrode array 203 has been inserted to the point of two electrode contacts E1 and E2 within the cochlea 205 (fig. 4C), the response measurement record from the second electrode contact E2 upon insertion of the second electrode contact E2 is compared to the record from the first electrode contact E1 upon introduction of the first electrode contact E1 into the cochlea 205. Then, when electrode array 203 is inserted to the point of three electrode contacts E1, E2, and E3 within cochlea 205 (fig. 4D), the response measurement record from the third electrode contact E3 immediately after the insertion of third electrode contact E3 is compared to the record from the second electrode contact E2 immediately after the insertion of second electrode contact E2 and the record from the first electrode contact E1 immediately after the insertion of first electrode contact E1. At the same time, the response measurement record from second electrode contact E2 in its current position is compared to the response measurement record from first electrode contact E1 when first electrode contact E1 is in the same position. And so on.

When at least one of the measured differences exceeds a defined difference threshold (step 306), then a potential wound response is identified and insertion is suspended (step 309). In particular embodiments, the program instructions of insertion controller 201 may determine a plurality of measured differences for a plurality of different electrode contacts 204 currently located at various given insertion depths within cochlea 205, and then identify a potential traumatic response when any one of these measured differences exceeds a defined difference. When in step 306 the at least one measured difference does not exceed the defined difference threshold, then if the insertion has been completed (step 307) it is stopped. Otherwise, if the insertion is not complete in step 307, the insertion of the electrode array 203 continues until the next contact 204 enters the cochlea 205, and then repeats again from step 303.

For example, fig. 5 shows an example of response signal measurements recorded at advancing electrode contacts 204 over time. Generally, the signal amplitude generally tends to increase to a certain inflection point, after which it generally decreases until insertion of the electrode array 203 is completed. Depending on the particular stimulation frequency used. This expected signal behavior would indicate no potential trauma and no hearing loss. However, as the magnitude of the evoked response signal decreases at a given location in the cochlea 205, potential trauma and hearing loss may be observed. In the example shown in fig. 5, this can be seen in the signal starting at time 4, where the signal amplitude is consistently reduced by up to 30% at all measurement positions. At this stage of electrode insertion, the surgeon needs to be notified of the potential trauma.

After suspending insertion for a short period of time in step 309 due to a potential trauma, it may be useful to proceed as in FIG. 3B by: measuring and recording the stimulus response again for each inserted contact 204 at its current position (step 310); a difference in measurement between each inserted electrode contact 204 is then determined (step 311), wherein for each inserted electrode contact there is a measurement of the response of the previous electrode contact 204 occupying the same position; then, it is again determined whether a potential traumatic response is identified (step 312). It is possible that the response measurement returns to normal after a pause, in which case the insertion of the electrode array 203 continues again until the next contact 204 enters the cochlea 205, and then repeats again from step 303.

If there is still a potential traumatic response in step 312, the surgeon may take multiple steps to attempt to address this issue; for example, array 203 is manipulated (step 313), e.g., by partially rotating array 203 and/or partially retracting array 203. Then, the stimulation response is measured and recorded again for each inserted contact 204 at its current position (step 314), and the measured difference between each inserted electrode contact 204 is determined (step 315), where for each inserted electrode contact there is a response measurement of the previous electrode contact 204 occupying the same position; then, it is again determined whether a potential traumatic response is identified (step 316). If the response measurements return to normal values after manipulation of the electrode array 203 (no potential trauma identified), insertion of the electrode array 203 continues again until the next contact 204 enters the cochlea 205, and then repeats again from step 303. If there is still potential trauma in step 316 after manipulation of the electrode array 203, the procedure is ended (insertion is complete, step 307) and the surgeon decides whether to withdraw the array without completing the procedure or to complete the insertion procedure despite the trauma.

The program instructions executed by the insertion controller 201 may be configured to suggest which portion of the electrode array 203 produces the greatest portion of the insertion force. The electrode array can then be manipulated to reduce the insertion force as much as possible.

For example, if the amplitude of the stimulation response recording increases sharply at a particular location in the cochlea 205 during insertion, this may indicate that the electrode array is pressed against the basal membrane (basilar membrane) or too close to the inner ear hair cells and associated neural structures. Typically in this case, the delay of the stimulus response is shorter, while at other parts of the cochlea 205 the magnitude of the stimulus response may actually be lower or remain the same. This may indicate that such electrode contact 204 is on the sidewall of the scala tympani and thus potentially lead to an increase in electrode insertion force. In this case, it is recommended to stop the insertion, wait, and possibly withdraw the electrode array 203 slightly by a small amount (e.g., 1mm or more). The surgeon may then proceed with the insertion by rotating the electrode array to navigate the trajectory of the electrode array tip, depending on the type of electrode array 203.

The evaluation value may be the amplitude of the recorded signal. It may be an amplitude defined as the peak-to-peak amplitude (difference between global/local maximum and global/local minimum) or an amplitude related to a specific stimulation frequency, i.e. in case the stimulation signal consists of one frequency, i.e. short tone stimulation of frequency f, the evaluated amplitude will be related to the frequency f. Another value to be evaluated is the delay of the recorded signal. A frequency analysis of the stimulus response signal may be performed to determine what type of response was recorded. Here, the signal is represented by the phase and amplitude of the recorded signal at each particular frequency.

Possible specific stimulus responses may include Cochlear Microphonics (CMs), summation potentials (SMs), and/or Compound Action Potentials (CAPs). For example, the CM amplitude of an electrode array can increase by up to ten times when a given electrode contact is moved from the sidewall to closer proximity to the basement membrane of the hair cells while still maintaining a deep position in the tympanic membrane without causing any additional hearing loss. In this case, the delay in stimulus response is typically shortened.

The change in stimulus response may be reversible and may be controlled by insertion force and speed, withdrawal and rotation of the electrode array. For example, the optimal insertion force for remaining residual hearing should remain below 25mN, and should never exceed 40 mN. Other contributing factors to hearing retention include the geometry of the electrodes leading to the cochlea and the prevention of blood and bone dust in the cochlea.

The risk of hearing trauma increases with the depth of insertion into the cochlea. Any potential wounds identified during insertion of the electrode array should be immediately assessed. One advantage of embodiments of the present invention is: the deeper the electrode array is inserted into the cochlea, the more precisely it can be controlled. As an additional benefit, the insertion depth of the electrode array can be estimated. This also provides a method of assessing and comparing the specific insertion behavior of various different electrode arrays.

Embodiments of the present invention can be implemented in part in any conventional computer programming language, such as VHDL, SystemC, Verilog, ASM, and the like. Alternative embodiments of the invention may be implemented as pre-programmed hardware elements, other related components, or as a combination of hardware and software components. Embodiments may also be implemented in part as a computer program product for use with a computer system. Such an implementation may comprise a series of computer instructions fixed either on a tangible medium, such as a computer readable medium (e.g., a diskette, CD-ROM, or fixed disk), or transmittable to a computer system, via a modem or other interface device, such as a communications adapter connected to a network over a medium. The medium may be either a tangible medium (e.g., optical or analog communications lines) or a medium embodying wireless techniques (e.g., microwave, infrared or other transmission techniques). The series of computer instructions embodies all or part of the functionality previously described herein with respect to the system. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that such computer instructions can be written in a number of programming languages for use with many computer architectures or operating systems. Additionally, such instructions may be stored in any memory device, such as a semiconductor memory device, a magnetic memory device, an optical memory device, or other memory device, and may be transmitted using any communications technology, such as optical, infrared, microwave, or other transmission technologies. It is contemplated that such a computer program product may be distributed as a removable medium with accompanying printed or electronic documentation (e.g., shrink wrapped software), preloaded with a computer system (e.g., on system ROM or fixed disk); or distributed from a server or electronic bulletin board over a network (e.g., the internet or world wide web). Of course, some embodiments of the invention may be implemented as a combination of software (e.g., a computer program product) and hardware. Still other embodiments of the invention are implemented as entirely hardware, or entirely software (e.g., a computer program product).

Although various exemplary embodiments of the present invention have been disclosed, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made which will achieve some of the advantages of the invention without departing from the true scope of the invention.