阅读说明：本技术 划线轴传感器 (Scribing axis sensor ) 是由 F.C.托马斯三世 J.安德森 O.理查德 于 2018-01-26 设计创作，主要内容包括：在根据本公开的一个示例中,描述了一种电子输入设备。所述电子输入设备包括被部署在壳体内的划线轴,该划线轴由于与基板接触而沿着纵向轴线平移。所述电子输入设备还包括输入传感器。输入传感器包括固定在壳体内的板。所述板响应于划线轴的平移而弹性变形。输入传感器的全桥应变仪被部署在板的表面上。所述全桥应变仪检测板的变形并且输出对应的信号,所述对应的信号取决于板的变形量而变化。输入传感器还包括故障保护设备,所述故障保护设备用于将板的变形限制在预定量内。(In one example in accordance with the present disclosure, an electronic input device is described. The electronic input device includes a scribe shaft disposed within the housing that translates along the longitudinal axis due to contact with the substrate. The electronic input device also includes an input sensor. The input sensor includes a plate secured within the housing. The plate elastically deforms in response to translation of the scribe axis. A full bridge strain gauge of input sensors is disposed on the surface of the plate. The full bridge strain gauge detects deformation of the plate and outputs a corresponding signal that varies depending on the amount of deformation of the plate. The input sensor further includes a fault protection device for limiting deformation of the plate to within a predetermined amount.)

1. An electronic input device comprising:

a scribe shaft disposed within the housing, the scribe shaft translating along the longitudinal axis due to contact with the substrate; and

an input sensor, comprising:

a plate secured within the housing, the plate elastically deforming in response to translation of the scribe axis;

a full bridge strain gauge disposed on a surface of the plate for detecting deformation of the plate and outputting a corresponding signal that varies depending on an amount of deformation of the plate; and

a fault protection device for limiting deformation of the plate to within a predetermined amount.

2. The device of claim 1, wherein the fault protection device comprises:

a shaft holder for holding a scribing shaft and translating with the scribing shaft; and

an annular housing for holding the plate and full bridge strain gauge;

wherein when the translation of the scribe shaft is greater than a predetermined amount, the shaft holder collides with the annular housing, the collision preventing plate is permanently deformed.

3. The device of claim 1, wherein the fault protection device comprises:

a shaft holder for holding a scribing shaft and translating with the scribing shaft;

an annular housing for holding the plate and full bridge strain gauge;

a plunger for contacting and deforming the plate; and

at least one spring disposed between the plunger and the shaft retainer to conduct and dampen an axial force from a scribe shaft to a plate;

wherein the axle holder collides with the annular housing when the scribing axle is translated more than a predetermined amount, the collision preventing plate is permanently deformed.

4. The device of claim 1, wherein the fault protection device comprises:

a magnetic ring on a first side of the plate for holding the plate in place against an axial force, wherein a magnetic force of the magnetic ring is overcome when more than a predetermined amount of axial force is applied against the plate; and

a foam ring on a second side of the plate for returning the plate into contact with the magnetic ring when the axial force is removed.

5. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising a rod for conducting axial force from the scribe axis to the plate.

6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the plate is supported circumferentially within the housing.

7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the input sensor detects an axial force of less than 2.0 grams.

8. An electronic input device comprising:

a scribe shaft disposed within the housing, the scribe shaft translating along the longitudinal axis due to contact with the substrate;

an annular housing for holding a sensor, the sensor comprising:

a plate elastically deformed in response to translation of the scribe axis; and

a full bridge strain gauge for detecting deformation of the plate and outputting a corresponding signal;

a shaft retainer for:

holding the scoring axis and translating with the scoring axis; and

contacting the annular housing when a predetermined contact force is reached to limit deformation of the plate to within a predetermined amount;

a plunger pressing against and deforming the plate in response to translation of the scribe shaft; and

a spring for:

conducting an axial force from the scribe shaft to the plate and damping the axial force; and

the scribing axis is returned to an initial position without contacting the substrate.

9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the plunger has a curved surface in contact with a plate.

10. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the full bridge strain gauge comprises:

two circumferential transverse strain gauges around the rim of the full bridge strain gauge; and

two inner radial strain gauges deployed inside the circumferential transverse strain gauge.

11. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the full bridge strain gauge is printed on a board.

12. An electronic input system comprising:

a housing including an opening through which the scribing axis protrudes;

an electronic input device disposed at least partially within the housing, the electronic input device comprising the scribe shaft; and

a sensor apparatus, comprising:

an annular housing;

an axial sensor disposed within the annular housing, the axial sensor comprising:

a plate elastically deformed in response to translation of the scribe axis;

a full bridge strain gauge for detecting deformation of the plate and outputting a corresponding signal; and

a shaft retainer for:

holding the scoring axis and translating with the scoring axis; and

contacting the annular housing when a predetermined contact force is reached to limit deformation of the plate to within a predetermined amount;

a plunger pressing against and deforming the plate in response to translation of the scribe shaft;

at least one spring for:

conducting an axial force from the scribe shaft to the plate and damping the axial force; and

returning the scribing axis to an initial position without contacting the substrate; and

circuitry to communicate an output of the full bridge strain gauge to a controller for performing an operation based on the axial force.

13. The system of claim 12, wherein the at least one spring comprises a single spring that contacts the shaft retainer and the annular housing when at rest.

14. The system of claim 12:

wherein the at least one spring comprises two springs for sequential operation;

wherein at rest:

a first spring contacting the shaft retainer and the annular housing;

a second spring contacting the shaft retainer; and

a gap is formed between the second spring and the annular shell; and is

Wherein the second spring contacts the annular housing when the first spring is fully compressed.

15. The system of claim 12, wherein the first spring and the second spring have different spring constants.

Background

The input device is coupled to an electronic device, such as a computer, tablet device, and other electronic devices. These input devices allow a user to input information to the electronic device. One example of an input device is an electronic pen. The writing end of the electronic pen includes a tip that can be pressed against a surface such as a touch screen display. The contact force between the tip and the surface may be used to perform an operation within the application, such as clicking on a button/icon within the application. In some examples, the tip is moved across the surface and a visual representation of the motion is displayed on the touch screen display. In this way, the electronic pen may be used to write text, draw images, or interface with applications on the electronic device.

Drawings

The accompanying drawings illustrate various examples of the principles described herein and are a part of the specification. The illustrated examples are given for illustration only and do not limit the scope of the claims;

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an electronic input device having an input sensor with a fault protection device according to an example of principles described herein;

2A-2C are diagrams of an electronic input system having an electronic input device sensor with a fault protection device according to an example of principles described herein;

3A-3C are diagrams of an electronic input device having an input sensor with a fault protection device according to an example of principles described herein;

4A-4D are diagrams of an electronic input device having an input sensor with a fault protection device according to an example of principles described herein;

5A-5C are diagrams of an electronic input device having an electronic sensor with a fault protection device according to an example of principles described herein;

FIG. 6 is a diagram of a full bridge strain gauge for use in an electronic input sensor with a fault protection device, according to an example of principles described herein;

throughout the drawings, identical reference numbers designate similar, but not necessarily identical, elements. The figures are not necessarily to scale and the sizes of some portions may be exaggerated to more clearly illustrate the example shown. Moreover, the figures provide examples and/or implementations consistent with the description; however, the description is not limited to the examples and/or implementations provided in the figures.

Detailed Description

The input device is coupled to an electronic device, such as a computer, tablet device, and other electronic devices. These input devices allow a user to input information to the electronic device. One example of an input device is an electronic pen. The writing end of the electronic pen includes a tip that can be pressed against a surface such as a touch screen display. The input device or electronic pen may also be used with other surfaces, such as paper designed for use with electronic pens. Although specific reference is made to several types of surfaces, any number of surfaces may be implemented in accordance with the principles described herein.

In other words, an electronic pen is an input device that captures a user's handwriting or brush strokes and converts the pen's movements into digital data, enabling the movements to be utilized in various applications or presented directly to a digital display. The surface that interfaces with the input device can be of various types. For example, the surface may be a display screen on an electronic device that is responsive to touch input, such as touch input from a finger or other device such as an electronic pen. In another example, the surface may be a paper surface specifically prepared for supporting electronic input. For example, the specially prepared paper may include features that are imperceptible to the human eye. As the tip passes over these features, it identifies the position of the tip on the specially prepared paper surface.

The contact force between the tip and the surface may be used to perform an operation within the application, such as clicking on a button/icon within the application. In some examples, the tip is moved across the surface and a visual representation of the motion is displayed on a touch screen display or other surface. In this way, the electronic pen may be used to write text, draw images, or interface with applications on the electronic device.

While such electronic pens allow a user to provide input to an electronic device, some features limit their more thorough implementation. For example, such input devices incorporate sensors to sense the level of pressure applied by the tip against the scribe surface. The sensed pressure may be used by the corresponding electronic device in a variety of ways. For example, it may be used to 1) vary the thickness of the brush strokes presented on the display, or 2) vary the width of the brush strokes if the input device is being used in a brush mode. Other operations may also be performed based on the output of the pressure sensor. For example, the sensor may determine when the electronic pen transitions from hovering over the scribing surface to actually contacting the scribing surface. In some examples, power management of the electronic pen, i.e. whether the pen is on, in standby mode or off, is also associated with the tip pressure sensor. That is, if no contact is detected, the stylus may be in a standby mode, but is turned on once contact is detected. In some implementations, a time-domain (time) delay between these transitions in power state may be included.

In some examples, such sensors are not sensitive enough to detect slight changes in applied force. Thus, a less satisfactory user experience is delivered that does not accurately replicate the pen on a paper environment. That is, in order to faithfully present a pen on paper with an electronic pen, the electronic pen should have high pressure sensitivity, resolution, and be fluid and able to sense forces close to zero.

In addition, such electronic pens are prone to catastrophic failure. That is, the sensors used in such pens are fragile and if dropped in certain orientations (e.g., tip down), the sensors may be damaged, rendering the sensors less effective and, in some cases, completely inoperable.

Thus, the present specification describes an input sensor that provides greater sensitivity and protects the sensor from catastrophic failure as may result when the electronic pen is dropped from a height (such as from a desktop). In particular, the present specification describes an electronic device input sensor that has low activation pressure, high resolution, and sensitivity, and includes a mechanism for protecting the sensor from catastrophic failure due to dropping or other failure mechanisms.

In particular, this specification describes an electronic input device. The electronic input device includes a scribe shaft disposed within the housing that translates along the longitudinal axis due to contact with the substrate. The electronic input device also includes an input sensor. The input sensor includes a plate secured within a housing. The plate elastically deforms in response to translation of the scribe axis. A full bridge strain gauge of sensors is disposed on the surface of the plate and detects deformation of the plate. The strain gauge outputs a corresponding signal that varies depending on the amount of deformation of the plate. The fault protection device of the electronic device input sensor limits the deformation of the plate to within a predetermined amount.

This specification also describes an electronic input device. The electronic input device includes a scribe shaft disposed within a housing. The scribe shaft translates along the longitudinal axis due to contact with the substrate. The electronic input device further comprises an annular housing for holding the sensor. The sensor includes a plate that elastically deforms in response to translation of the scribe axis and a full bridge strain gauge for detecting deformation of the plate and outputting a corresponding signal. The sensor also includes a shaft retainer for 1) retaining and translating with the scribe shaft, and 3) contacting the annular housing when a predetermined contact force is reached to limit deformation of the plate to within a predetermined amount. In response to translation of the scoring shaft, a plunger of the apparatus abuts the plate and deforms the plate. The electronic input device further includes a spring for 1) conducting an axial force from the scribe shaft to the board and damping the axial force, and 2) returning the scribe shaft to an initial position without contacting the substrate.

This specification also describes an electronic input system. The system includes a housing including an opening through which a scoring shaft protrudes. The system also includes an electronic input device at least partially disposed within the housing. The electronic input device includes a scribe axis and a sensor device. The sensor device includes a sensor disposed within an annular housing. The sensor includes 1) a plate that elastically deforms in response to translation of the scribe axis, 2) a full bridge strain gauge for detecting deformation of the plate and outputting a corresponding signal. The sensor also includes a shaft retainer for 1) retaining and translating with the scribe shaft, and 2) contacting the annular housing when a predetermined contact force is reached to limit deformation of the plate to within a predetermined amount. In response to translation of the scribe shaft, a plunger of the sensor abuts the plate and deforms the plate. The sensor also includes at least one spring for 1) conducting and damping an axial force from the scribe shaft to the plate, and 2) returning the scribe shaft to an initial position without contacting the substrate. The electronic input system further comprises circuitry for communicating the output of the full bridge strain gauge to a controller for performing an operation based on the axial force.

In one example, using such an electronic input device 1) may exhibit enhanced force sensing sensitivity; 2) may better respond to differences in user input force and direction; 3) a user experience more closely resembling a pen and paper experience may be provided; and 4) the axial sensor can be protected from catastrophic failure. However, it is contemplated that the apparatus disclosed herein may address other problems and deficiencies in a number of technical areas.

As used in this specification and the appended claims, the term "electronic pen" refers to an electronic input device that mimics a pen.

Further, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the term "scribe axis" refers to a component of an electronic input device that contacts a surface to generate an output. For example, a user presses a scribe axis of an electronic input device against a surface such as paper, a digital display, and/or a touch screen display. This is done so that the scribe axis translates longitudinally along the axis of the electronic input device.

Still further, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the term "circumferential strain gauge wire" refers to a strain gauge wire formed around a rim of a circular strain gauge, and wherein the strain sensing portion of the wire has a radial orientation. This is the orientation from the inside of the circular strain gauge towards the edge of the circular strain gauge.

Still further, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the term "radial strain gauge wire" refers to a strain gauge wire that is located inside a circumferential wire, and wherein the strain sensing portion of the wire has a circumferential orientation. That is, the orientation in which the wire is bent and parallel to the edge of the circular strain gauge.

Still further, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the term "axial" refers to a force or direction that is collinear with a longitudinal axis of the electronic input device.

Furthermore, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the term "plurality" or similar language is intended to be broadly construed to include any positive number from 1 to infinity.

Turning now to the figures, fig. 1 is a block diagram of an electronic input device (100) having an input sensor (108), the input sensor (108) having a fault protection device (106), according to an example of principles described herein. An electronic input device (100) includes a scribe axis (112), the scribe axis (112) referring to a component that contacts a surface to generate an output. For example, a user presses a scribe axis (112) of an electronic input device (100) against a surface such as paper, a digital display, and/or a touch screen display. Doing so causes the scribe axis (112) to translate longitudinally along the axis of the electronic input device. The axial force is sensed by an input sensor (108).

An input sensor (108) generates an output in response to the scribe axis (112) contacting the surface. The axial force is sensed by an input sensor (108), and a plurality of operations may be performed based on the output. For example, line widths may be varied, application operations may be performed or initiated, and power may be provided to the electronic input device. In some examples, different functions may be performed based on different outputs.

To sense the axial force, the input sensor (108) includes various components. For example, the input sensor (108) includes a plate (102). The plate (102) may be circular and formed to fit within the housing of the electronic input device (100). The plate (102) elastically deforms in response to an axial force from the scribe axis (112) as it translates. That is, contact of the scribe axis (112) against the surface causes the axis (112) to translate within the electronic input device (100). The translation is directly or indirectly transmitted to the plate (102), and the plate (102) deforms. However, when the force is removed, i.e. the shaft (112) returns to its original position, and the plate (102) returns to its undeformed state. The plate (102) may be formed of a thin material for deformation.

Such deformation of the plate (102) induces tensile and compressive strains in the plate (102). As will be described below, the amount of tensile and compressive strain in the plate (102) may be measured and corresponding output signals generated. The amount of strain depends on a number of factors including the type of material and thickness. For example, a thinner plate (102) may deform more and thus be more sensitive to axial forces, while a thicker plate (102) may deform less and thus be less sensitive to axial forces. The plate (102) may be formed from any number of materials including spring steel or aluminum.

The input sensor (108) also includes a full bridge strain gauge (104), the full bridge strain gauge (104) for detecting deformation of the plate (102) -both tension and compression of the plate. For example, the electrical resistance of certain materials changes when strain is applied to the materials or when the materials are stretched. That is, when a force is applied to the metal wire, the length of the metal wire increases due to the strain. The greater the force applied, the greater the strain and the greater the increase in length of the metal wire. For example, if

Is the initial length of the wire, andis the final length after the application of the force, the strain can be modeled as

. The resistance of the wire increases as its length increases. In addition, the diameter of the wire decreases as its length increases, which further changes the wire resistivity. The change in conductor resistance can be measured and calibrated in accordance with the applied force. Thus, the full bridge strain gauge (104) is used to measure the strain on the plate (102), from which the associated axial force can be determined. The input and output relationships of a strain gauge may be expressed by a strain gauge factor, which is defined as the change in resistance for a given applied strain value.

In some examples, the full-bridge strain gauge (104) is circular in shape and is disposed on top of the plate (102). When the plate (102) is deformed, the wires in the strain gauge (104) are elongated and thinned, causing their electrical resistance to change. The change in resistance may be mapped to an applied force that deforms the plate (102) and an operation performed accordingly. That is, the full bridge strain gauge (104) outputs a signal corresponding to the deformation defined by the axial force applied to the scribe axis. The output value of the full bridge strain gauge (104) varies depending on the deformation of the plate (102) and the corresponding stress of the scribe axis against the surface. That is, different output values correspond to different scribing forces.

In some examples, a full bridge strain gauge (104) includes a strain sensitive wire that is disposed with a material, such as a copper-nickel-manganese alloy, that is then bonded to a plate (102). The adhesive used to couple the strain gauge (104) to the plate (102) depends on the expected life of the input sensor (108). For example, in a short measurement, corresponding to a number of weeks, cyanoacrylate glue may be used, but in a longer measurement, epoxy glue may be used. In another example, the wires forming the full bridge strain gauge (104) are printed directly on the board (102).

The input sensor (108) further includes a fault protection device (106), the fault protection device (106) for limiting deformation of the plate (102) to within a predetermined amount. That is, if the axial force is large enough, a plate (102) that is so thin that it deforms due to the scribing pressure may also permanently deform. For example, if the electronic input device (100) is dropped such that the tip of the scribe axle (112) contacts the ground with a significant force, without such a fault protection device (106), the scribe axle (112) may be pressed against the plate (102) with such a force as to permanently deform the plate (102) or otherwise fracture the plate (102). Doing so would obviously hinder the performance of the input sensor (108) and, in some cases, render the input sensor (108) inoperable. The fault protection device (106) operates to prevent such impact contact, thereby protecting the panel (102).

The fault protection device (106) also protects the full bridge strain gauge (104). That is, the full bridge strain gauge (104) may have precision circuitry disposed on a precision substrate such that excessive force can affect its operation. Thus, the fault protection device (106) prevents unconstrained deformation of the plate (102) and full-bridge strain gauge (104), thereby improving their performance and longevity.

The electronic device input sensor (108) of the present description may be capable of detecting axial forces of less than 2.0 grams by a full bridge strain gauge (104) with high sensitivity. Additionally, the use of the fault protection device (106) may increase the service life of the electronic device input sensor (108) and corresponding electronic input device.

Fig. 2A-2C are diagrams of an electronic input system (209) having an electronic input device (fig. 1, 100) with an electronic device input sensor (fig. 1, 108) with a fault protection device (fig. 1, 106) according to an example of principles described herein. Specifically, fig. 2A is a view of a portion of an electronic input system (209) with a housing (110) cut away to expose an electronic input device (100) at least partially disposed therein. Fig. 2B is a cross-sectional view of the electronic input system (209) in a non-contact state, and fig. 2C is a cross-sectional view of the electronic input system (209) in a contact state, wherein a failed protection device (106, fig. 1) is engaged to prevent a catastrophic failure. In this description and in the appended claims, an electronic input system (209) refers to an electronic input device (100) together with a housing (210) into which the electronic input device is inserted.

As depicted in fig. 2A, the electronic input system (209) includes an external housing (210). The outer housing (210) holds other components of an electronic input system (209) that includes the electronic input device (100). The housing (110) includes an opening through which the scribe axis (112) protrudes.

The outer housing (210) also provides a surface that a user can grip to manipulate the electronic input device (100). In some examples, the outer housing (210) has a rubber boot or other ergonomic feature deployed along at least a portion of its length to provide a grip. The grip provides greater friction so that a user can grasp the outer housing (210) and more easily manipulate the electronic input device (100) to interact with a surface. The outer housing (210) may be formed of any material, such as plastic or metal.

The electronic input system (209) further comprises an electronic input device (100) at least partially disposed within the outer housing (210). For example, the tip of the scribe shaft (112) may protrude through an opening of the housing (210), but other components may be inside the housing (210).

The electronic input device (100) includes various components to facilitate interaction with a surface such as a touch screen display or specially prepared paper as described above. For example, an electronic input device (100) includes a scribe axis (112), the scribe axis (112) having a tip that interfaces with a surface.

The electronic input device (100) may further include a sensor device for detecting axial movement of the scribe axis (112). That is, when the scribe axis (112) contacts the surface, it translates in the direction indicated by arrow (222). The translation is sensed by the sensor device and converted into a signal that is an input to the computing device for performing various operations.

The sensor device includes an annular housing (216).

The sensor device also includes an input sensor (fig. 1, 108). In some examples, the input sensor (fig. 1, 108) includes a shaft holder (224), the shaft holder (224) for holding the scribe shaft (112) and at least partially translating force therefrom onto the plate (fig. 1, 102). For example, the shaft retainer (224) may move a plunger (225) that presses against the plate (fig. 1, 102) and deforms the plate (fig. 1, 102) in response to translation of the scribe shaft (112). In some examples, the shaft retainer (224) also forms part of the fault protection device (106, fig. 1). Specifically, as described below in at least fig. 2B and 2C, the shaft retainer (224) contacts the annular housing (216) when a predetermined contact force is reached to limit deformation of the plate (fig. 1, 102) to within a predetermined amount. Accordingly, the spacing between the annular sensor housing (216) and the shaft retainer (224) and the spring constant of the spring (218) are selected to allow detection of force but prevent permanent deformation of the plate (102).

The electronic input device (100) further comprises at least one spring (218). The spring (218) is biased to oppose translation of the scoring shaft (112) such that it at least partially dampens axial forces in the direction of the arrow (222) and returns the scoring shaft (112) to a non-contact position in the absence of a contact force of the scoring shaft (112) against a surface. In some examples, as depicted in fig. 2A, the spring (218) is a compression spring, such as a wave spring, that resists compression and is initially in contact with both the plunger (224) and the annular housing (216).

The electronic input system (209) also includes a circuit (220). The circuitry (220) includes hardware, such as a processor and memory, to receive the output signals of the sensor device and to communicate the output signals to a controller where different computational operations may be performed based on the output signals. For example, based on the output signal, line widths may be adjusted, computing applications executed, operations within applications executed, and electronic input device (100) initialized.

Fig. 2B is a cross-sectional view of the electronic input system (209) with the electronic input device (100) in a non-contact state. Fig. 2B clearly depicts the shaft retainer (224) as it presses the plunger (225) against the plate (102) via the spring (218). In this example, neither the plate (102) nor the full bridge strain gauge (104) is deformed because there is no contact force. In this example, the fault protection device (fig. 1, 106) includes 1) a shaft holder (224) that holds and translates with the scribe shaft (112), 2) a plunger (225), and 3) an annular housing (216) that holds the plate (102) and the full bridge strain gauge (104). In this example, a gap (226) exists between the shaft retainer (224) and the annular housing (216) because the threshold translation and threshold contact forces have not been reached. Note that in some examples, the plunger (225) has a curved contact surface with the plate (102). Doing so reduces contact stresses on the plate (102) and may extend the life of the sensing system.

Fig. 2B also depicts that the plate (102) and full bridge strain gauge (104) are supported circumferentially within the housing (210). That is, they are supported on the bottom by an annular housing (216) and on the top by a cover (217) to hold them in place. As indicated, the plate (102) and full bridge strain gauge (104) may flex uniformly throughout their respective surfaces as supported on both sides.

Fig. 2C is a cross-sectional view of the electronic input system (209) with the electronic input device (100) in a contact state. That is, in this example, the scribe axis (112) translates in response to a contact force between the scribe axis (112) and the surface. The translation compresses the spring (218) against the contact force, thereby dampening the contact force. The translation also causes the plunger (225) to deform the plate (102) and the full bridge strain gauge (104). Such deformation causes the wires making up the full bridge strain gauge (104) to elongate and thin, thereby changing their resistivity. These changes in resistivity generate output signals that are communicated to circuitry (220) for external connection to control a computing device.

Fig. 2C also depicts the operation of the fault prevention device (fig. 1, 106), which in this example includes an annular housing (216) and a shaft retainer (224). In this example, the scribe shaft (112) and shaft holder (224) have been displaced sufficiently such that the shaft holder (224) contacts the annular housing (216), thereby preventing further translation of the scribe shaft (112) and further deformation of the plate (102) and full bridge strain gauge (104), as compared to fig. 2B. Thus, permanent deformation of the plate (102) and strain gauge (104) is prevented. The degree to which the plate (102) is allowed to deform is based on a number of factors, including the distance between the annular housing (216) and the shaft retainer (224) and the spring constant of the spring (218). Such factors may vary across different input devices (100) based on the application and use.

Fig. 3A-3C are diagrams of an electronic input device (315) having an input sensor (fig. 1, 108) with a fault protection device (fig. 1, 106) according to an example of principles described herein. Specifically, fig. 3A is a cross-sectional view of the electronic input device (315) in a non-contact state, fig. 3B is a cross-sectional view of the electronic input device (315) in a contact state, and fig. 3C is a cross-sectional view of the electronic input device (315) engaging a failsafe device (fig. 1, 106). Note that for reference, fig. 3A-3C depict the housing (210) of the electronic input system (209, fig. 2) in dashed lines.

As described above, the housing (210) has an opening through which the tip of the scribing axis (112) protrudes. The tip of the scribe axis (112) is the portion of the scribe axis (112) that interfaces with the surface. That is, the user grasps the housing (210) and brings the tip into contact with the surface. As the tip moves across the surface, a visual representation corresponding to the movement of the tip is made on a display (e.g., surface). In some examples, contact of the tip with the surface results in a function being performed on an electronic device coupled with the surface. For example, a user may tap on a portion of a surface with a tip to position a cursor on the portion of the surface. In another example, a user may tap an icon on a surface and may perform an operation on the electronic device. In some examples, the scribe axis (112) may be formed of metal and a tip. In other examples, the tip may be formed of another material, such as rubber. In still other examples, the tip may be formed from a composite material.

In some examples, the scribe shaft (112) is removable from the outer housing (210). For example, over time and with frequent use, the tip may wear. In another example, the tip may break. In these and other examples, a removable scribe shaft (112) having a worn or otherwise damaged tip may be removed and replaced with another scribe shaft (112).

Fig. 3A-3C also depict a plate (102) and a full bridge strain gauge (104). However, certain elements of fig. 3A-3C and other figures, such as the plate (102) and full bridge strain gauge (104), are not drawn to scale and are exaggerated for simplicity.

Fig. 3A-3C also depict an electronic input device (315) having another example of a fault protection device (fig. 1, 106). In this example, the fault protection device (106, fig. 1) includes a magnetic ring (328) on a first side of the plate (102) to hold the plate (102) in place against axial forces. In this example, the fault protection device (fig. 1, 106) also includes a foam ring (330) on the second side of the plate (102), and more specifically, on the second side of the strain gauge (104). When the magnetic force of magnetic ring (328) is overcome by the axial force, foam ring (330) catches plate (102) and strain gauge (104) and returns plate (102) to contact magnetic ring (328) once the catastrophic overload axial force is no longer present. The foam ring (330) will allow the scribe shaft (112) to retract into the body of the pen, protecting the plate (102), strain gauge (104) and tip end from catastrophic failure. The fault protection device (fig. 1, 106) also includes a stop plate (332) against which the foam ring (330) is compressed. As depicted in fig. 3A, when there is no axial force, the scribe shaft (112) contacts the plate (102), but does not deform it.

In fig. 3B, the scribing axis (112) is pressed against the surface so that the scribing axis (112) is translated in the direction indicated by the arrow (222). In this example, the magnetic force of the magnetic ring (328) is strong enough to hold the plate (102) and the full bridge strain gauge (104) while allowing each of the plate (102) and the full bridge strain gauge (104) to deform. Such deformation is captured by the strain gauge (104) and output to the circuitry (fig. 2, 220) to perform a particular operation. In this example, deformation of the plate (102) and strain gauge (104) may cause the foam ring (330) to compress against the stop plate (332). As such, the foam ring (330) may be formed of a material that slowly springs back when compressed, which may result in the foam ring (330) abutting the profile of the plate (102)/strain gauge (104). An example of such a material is in the form of a cellular polyurethane.

In fig. 3C, a force is applied to overcome the magnetic force of the magnetic ring (328). Such forces may lead to catastrophic failure. For example, when the electronic input device (315) is dropped and the scribe axis (112) hits the surface. In this example, the force pushes the plate (102) and strain gauge (104) away from the magnetic ring (328). Since they are no longer coupled to the magnetic ring (328), they return to their original shape, i.e., they are no longer deformed. Accordingly, a magnetic ring (328) having a desired magnetic force corresponding to the desired deformation may be selected. For example, a magnetic ring (328) with a smaller magnetic force will be overcome with a smaller axial force (222) than a magnetic ring (328) with a larger magnetic force. Accordingly, the magnetic ring (328) may be selected based on a desired deformation of the plate (102) and/or an elastic limit of the plate (102) material.

When the force causing the magnetic ring (328) to decouple from the plate (102) is removed, the foam ring (330) will return to its original shape when uncompressed. Thus, the plate (102)/strain gauge (104) returns to its position against the magnetic ring (328). Thus, the present example allows for deformation of the plate (102) up to a predetermined amount, which is defined based on the magnetic force of the magnetic ring (328). After this point is reached, the plate (102) is pressed into the foam ring (330) and, once the force dissipates, then returns to its position against the magnetic ring (328).

Fig. 4A-4D are diagrams of an electronic input device (417) having an electronic device input sensor (fig. 1, 108) with a fault protection device (fig. 1, 106) according to an example of principles described herein. Specifically, fig. 4A is a cross-sectional view of an electronic input device (417) in a non-contact state, fig. 4B is a cross-sectional view of an electronic input device (417) in a contact state but not in catastrophic contact, fig. 4C is a cross-sectional view of an electronic input device (417) in a contact state with a fault protection device (fig. 1, 106) engaged, and fig. 4D is a cross-sectional view of an electronic input device (417) with a shaft spring.

Specifically, fig. 4A is a cross-sectional view of a portion of an electronic input device (417), particularly depicting the scribe shaft (112), shaft holder (224), annular housing (216), plate (102), and strain gauge (104) prior to contact between the scribe shaft (112) and a contact surface. In this example, the sensor device further includes a rod (434) interfacing with the plate (102) and a compression spring (436) at least partially damping the axial force. That is, when a force is applied, the compression spring (436) dampens the force. In this manner, based on the spring constant of the compression spring (436), a desired force-versus-deflection relationship may be defined.

Fig. 4B depicts an electronic input device (417) when contact is made between the tip of the scribe axis (112) and the surface. This contact causes the scribe shaft (112) and shaft holder (224), as well as the compression spring (436) and lever (434), to translate in the direction indicated by arrow (222). The translation causes the rod (434) to contact the plate (102) and the full bridge strain gauge (104) and deform the plate (102) and the full bridge strain gauge (104).

Fig. 4C depicts an electronic input device (417) when contact is made between the tip of the scribe shaft (112) and the surface, which could otherwise result in catastrophic failure. In this example, contact between the shaft holder (224) and the annular housing (216) prevents additional translation of the scribe shaft (112), and thereby also prevents additional deformation of the plate (102) and strain gauge (104), which may be sufficient to cause permanent deformation of the plate (102) and/or damage to the full bridge strain gauge (104).

Fig. 4D depicts another example of an electronic input device (417) including a shaft spring (438). In this example, the weight of the sensor device may reduce the sensitivity of the sensor device. Accordingly, a shaft spring (438) may be placed at the base of the shaft holder (224) along the length of the scribe shaft (112) to urge the sensor device upwardly with a force equal to the weight of the device, thereby ensuring that any applied force experienced at the tip is conducted to the sensor.

Fig. 5A-5C are diagrams of an electronic input device (519) with an electronic input sensor (fig. 1, 108) having a fault protection device (fig. 1, 106) according to an example of principles described herein. Specifically, fig. 5A-5C depict a sensor having a plurality of springs (540). In this example, the electronic input device (519) may include a scribe shaft (112), a shaft retainer (224), a plunger (225), an annular housing (216), a plate (102), and a strain gauge (104). In this example, a dual spring (540-1, 540-2) design is used to induce multiple force/deflection relationships. Specifically, for an initial force that may be lighter, the first spring (540-1) absorbs all of the force before the second spring (540-2) engages. That is, at rest, the first spring (540-1) is in contact with the shaft retainer (224) and the annular housing (216), and when the second spring (540-2) is in contact with the shaft retainer (224), there is a gap (542) between the second spring (540-2) and the annular housing (216). In other words, these springs (540-1, 540-2) operate sequentially to dampen the force of the plunger (224) against the plate (102)/strain gauge (104) interface. In this example, the first spring (540-1) and the second spring (540-2) may have different spring constants such that there are different scoring axis (112) translations in relation to plate (102) deformation. For example, the first spring (540-1) may have a lighter spring constant, making it more sensitive and providing higher resolution at lower forces. In contrast, the second spring (540-2) may be stiffer, making it less sensitive and providing lower resolution at higher forces.

Fig. 5B depicts the electronic input device (519) wherein the first spring (540-1) is compressed such that there is no longer a gap between the second spring (540-2) and the annular housing (216). In this example, the second spring (540-2) is now engaged. In this example, there is still available deformation due to the continuous gap (542) between the annular housing (216) and the shaft retainer (224).

Fig. 5C depicts the electronic input device (519) in a contact state engaging a failsafe device (fig. 1, 106). That is, the shaft retainer (224) is contacting the annular housing (216) such that the scribe shaft (112) may no longer translate and the plate (102) may no longer deform. Such a system thus prevents excessive strain/deflection of the plate (102), thereby allowing deflection while preserving its lifetime, so that accurate, sensitive and high resolution information can be collected regarding the axial translation of the electronic stroke bobbin (112) against the contact surface and the contact force.

Fig. 6 is a diagram of a full-bridge strain gauge (104) for use in an electronic device input sensor (fig. 1, 108) with a fault protection device (fig. 1, 106) according to an example of principles described herein. As described above, the strain gauge (104) is a hardware component that detects changes in strain and converts such detection into an output resistance. That is, the resistivity changes based on the induced strain. In one example, the full bridge strain gauge (104) of the present description is circular in shape to fit within the housing (fig. 2, 210) of an electronic input device (fig. 1, 100). A full bridge strain gauge (104) comprises two circumferential strain gauge wires (644-1, 644-2) formed around the rim of the strain gauge (104), wherein the strain sensing portions of the wires have a radial orientation. The full bridge strain gauge (104) further comprises two radial strain gauge wires (644-. Note that as depicted in fig. 6, in some examples, the strain gauge (104) wire pattern occupies both the center and edge portions of the strain gauge (104).

In one example, using such an electronic input device 1) may exhibit enhanced force sensing sensitivity; 2) may better respond to differences in user input force and direction; 3) a user experience more closely resembling a pen and paper experience may be provided; and 4) the axial sensor can be protected from catastrophic failure. However, it is contemplated that the apparatus disclosed herein may address other problems and deficiencies in a number of technical areas.