阅读说明：本技术 用于输电线路的无参数的基于行波的故障定位 (Parametric traveling wave based fault location for power transmission lines ) 是由 O·D·奈杜 于 2018-06-15 设计创作，主要内容包括：本发明提供了一种用于在输电线路中进行故障定位的方法和装置。所述方法包括获得(202)在输电线路的第一终端处和第二终端处检测到的行波的第一峰和第二峰的到达时间。所述方法还包括基于从在第一终端处的测量检测到的行波的到达时间与从在第二终端处的测量检测到的行波的到达时间的比较来识别(204,206)输电线路的前半部分、后半部分和中点中的一个为具有故障。因此,利用对应的行波的第一峰和第二峰的到达时间以及输电线路的长度来估计(208,210,212)故障定位。(The invention provides a method and a device for fault location in a power transmission line. The method comprises obtaining (202) arrival times of a first peak and a second peak of a travelling wave detected at a first terminal and at a second terminal of the transmission line. The method further comprises identifying (204, 206) one of the first half, the second half and the midpoint of the transmission line as having a fault based on a comparison of the arrival time of the traveling wave detected from the measurement at the first terminal and the arrival time of the traveling wave detected from the measurement at the second terminal. Thus, the fault location is estimated (208, 210, 212) using the arrival times of the first and second peaks of the corresponding travelling wave and the length of the transmission line.)

1. A method for fault location in a power transmission line connecting a first terminal and a second terminal, wherein the method is implemented with a processor of a device associated with the power transmission line, the method comprising:

obtaining arrival times of first and second peaks of the traveling wave detected from measurements made at the first and second terminals;

identifying one of a first half, a second half and a midpoint of the power transmission line as having a fault based on a comparison of the obtained time of arrival of the traveling wave detected from the measurement made at the first terminal and the obtained time of arrival of the traveling wave detected from the measurement made at the second terminal; and

estimating the fault location based on the identification of the first half, the second half, and the midpoint with the fault, the arrival times of the first peak and the second peak of the traveling wave detected from measurements made at the first terminal and the second terminal, and the length of the power transmission line.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein identifying one of the first half, second half, and midpoint as having a fault comprises: comparing (tn2-tm1) and (tm2-tn1), wherein tm1 and tm2 are the obtained times of arrival of the first and second peaks of the traveling wave detected from the measurement made at the first terminal, and tn1 and tn2 are the obtained times of arrival of the first and second peaks of the traveling wave detected from the measurement made at the second terminal.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the fault is identified as being in the first half if (tn2-tm1) is greater than (tm2-tn1) and the fault is identified as being in the second half if (tm2-tn1) is greater than (tn2-tm 1).

4. Method according to claim 3, wherein the fault location (d1) in the first half of the transmission line is byEstimating; and wherein the fault location (d2) in the second half of the transmission line is byAnd L is the length of the power transmission line.

5. The method of claim 2, wherein the midpoint of the power transmission line is identified as having the fault if a difference between (tn2-tm1) and (tm2-tn1) is less than a threshold.

6. The method according to claim 5, wherein the fault location is estimated by taking the average of two fault locations, wherein a first fault location is estimated for a fault in the first half of the power transmission line and a second fault location is estimated for a fault in the second half of the power transmission line.

7. An apparatus for fault location in a power transmission line, the apparatus comprising:

a traveling wave detector to obtain arrival times of first and second peaks of a traveling wave detected from measurements made at the first and second terminals;

a faulty half-part identifier for identifying one of the first half, the second half and the midpoint of the transmission line as having the fault based on a comparison of the obtained arrival time of the traveling wave detected from the measurement made at the first terminal and the obtained arrival time of the traveling wave detected from the measurement made at the second terminal, and

a fault locator to estimate the fault location based on the identification of the first half, the second half, and the midpoint with the fault, arrival times of first and second peaks of the traveling wave detected from measurements made at the first and second terminals, and a length of the power transmission line.

8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the apparatus is an intelligent electronic apparatus associated with one of the first terminal and the second terminal, and wherein the apparatus receives the measurements taken at the corresponding terminal from a measurement device associated with the corresponding terminal and receives measurements taken at the other terminal from an apparatus associated with the other terminal of the power transmission line over a communication channel.

9. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the apparatus is a server connected to intelligent electronic devices associated with the first terminal and the second terminal, respectively.

10. The device of claim 9, wherein the server receives traveling wave parameters obtained by the intelligent electronic device from the measurements made at the respective terminals.

Technical Field

The present invention relates generally to fault location in power transmission lines. More particularly, the invention relates to travelling wave based fault localization using measurements at both ends of a transmission line.

Background

A transmission line is a backbone for transmitting electrical energy from a power generation source to a load center. Transmission lines experience faults caused by natural conditions such as storms, lightning, snow, rain, and insulation breakdown and short circuit faults caused by birds, tree branches, and other external objects.

Power can only be restored after a permanent failure after the repair team completes the repair of the damage caused by the failure. For this reason, the fault location must be known, otherwise the entire line (or a large portion thereof) must be examined to find the point of failure. This task becomes even more burdensome and time consuming if one considers laying high voltage transmission lines up to hundreds of kilometers long.

Underground lines and cables must be exposed from the ground, requiring more manpower and machinery, and in densely populated areas, roads and accesses must be blocked to perform inspection and repair. It is therefore important that either the location of the fault is known or can be estimated with good accuracy. This makes it possible to save both money and time for the inspection and repair work, and helps the public setting to provide better service and improve reliability. In other words, quickly identifying fault locations improves reliability and availability and reduces the loss of revenue that may occur.

The fault location method is classified into two types, i.e., a single-ended type and a double-ended type, based on the availability of the input number. According to the fault location principle, fault location methods are classified into impedance-based methods, artificial intelligence-based methods, and traveling wave-based methods. Impedance-based fault location methods require accurate computation of fundamental voltage and fundamental current. This requires reliable filtering techniques and a sufficiently long fault data set.

Due to low inertia, integrating the renewable energy system into the grid may have an impact on grid stability limits, and this will require faster fault clearing protection schemes. Also, a fast protection (example traveling wave) scheme will also clear the fault in less than two cycles. If the fault is cleared faster than two cycles, the current may not reach its steady state and the voltage may not drop from its fault state to steady state, so impedance-based fault locators tend not to estimate the location accurately.

Furthermore, impedance-based fault location methods rely on the mutual coupling of line and source impedances, heterogeneity, source-to-line impedance ratios, fault resistance, fault loop information, and the like. With recent improvements in data acquisition and signal processing technology, traveling wave fault locators are becoming more popular in scenarios where higher accuracy is important. The traveling wave based approach requires only 2 to 3 milliseconds (ms) of data to locate the fault point and is not dependent on the above mentioned factors. Fault localization using traveling waves can be estimated by multiplying the time difference between the initial traveling wave and/or its reflection at that point by the propagation velocity.

Communication-based methods are considered to be more accurate and reliable. Travelling wave fault location methods based on simultaneous measurement of both ends are known. The accuracy of the traveling wave based approach depends on the accuracy of the line parameters (e.g., inductance and capacitance per unit length). Since the condition of the transmission line is constantly changing, it is difficult to accurately estimate the line parameters.

A setup-free fault location method may be used to avoid having to input line parameter data. Such an approach would require an alternate signal for estimating the required parameters. For example, the method may require an overhead line mode signal and a ground mode signal. Ground mode signals are highly attenuated and unreliable and are only available for ground faults. Thus, such an approach may only be applicable to ground faults.

The accuracy of existing communication-based methods is highly dependent on the line propagation speed. The propagation velocity can be calculated by using the line parameters. Furthermore, these line parameters are difficult to accurately capture, and the accuracy depends on many practical conditions, such as load, weather, aging, material properties, etc. Therefore, there is a need for accurate fault location methods that can overcome this challenge.

Disclosure of Invention

The present invention provides a method that is independent of line parameters. In other words, the invention provides a parameterless travelling wave based fault localization for a transmission line. The system and method of the present invention does not require experimentation to calibrate the propagation velocity for deploying a fault locating solution.

There may be an electrical fault (or disturbance) at a particular location in the transmission line. The fault may be located in a half of the line (e.g., the first half of the line, the second half of the line) or at the midpoint of the line. From the measurements made at both terminals (i.e. the measurement made at the first terminal and the measurement made at the second terminal, where the measurements are performed by synchronized means) it can be identified that such a faulty half-section (or midpoint) is faulty. These measurements include current/voltage measurements made using a measurement device. For example, the measurement devices may include current transformers, voltage transformers, sensor-based measurement devices (e.g., Rogowski coils, non-conventional instrument transformers, etc.) that provide signals sensed from the line corresponding to, for example, current, voltage, or other information, and/or the like.

When there is a fault in the line, a travelling wave is generated. The method includes obtaining a plurality of parameters associated with a traveling wave detected from measurements made at a first terminal and at a second terminal. The traveling wave and its parameters (e.g., time of arrival, peak width, rise time, etc.) may be detected from measurements made at one or more terminals (e.g., from one or more signals received from one or more measurement devices). For example, the current signal may be digitized and processed to detect a traveling wave.

Different travelling waves are generated due to faults and can be detected from measurements made at different terminals. The method comprises the following steps: the method further includes obtaining a plurality of parameters associated with the traveling wave detected from the measurement at the first terminal and obtaining a plurality of parameters associated with the traveling wave detected from the measurement at the second terminal. Here, the measurement at the first terminal and the measurement at the second terminal are synchronized. For example, if two IEDs (or fault locators) obtain measurements, the two IEDs (and/or corresponding measurement devices) are synchronized.

In one embodiment, the plurality of parameters includes an arrival time of a first peak and an arrival time of a second peak of the traveling wave. Thus, for the travelling wave detected from the measurements made at the first terminal, the arrival time of the first peak and the arrival time of the second peak are obtained. It should be noted that the second peak may correspond to the second traveling wave. This is the case when the second peak corresponds to a reflected wave from a point other than the fault (e.g., far end). Similarly, for the travelling wave detected from the measurement made at the second terminal, the arrival time of the first peak and the arrival time of the second peak are obtained.

The method further includes identifying the faulty half or midpoint as having a fault. A faulty half-section (or midpoint) of the line is identified as having a fault based on a comparison of the arrival time of the traveling wave detected at the first terminal and the arrival time of the traveling wave detected at the second terminal. In one embodiment, the faulty half-section (or midpoint) is identified by comparing (tn2-tm1) to (tm2-tn1), where tm1 and tm2 are the arrival times of the first and second peaks detected from measurements made at the first terminal, and tn1 and tn2 are the arrival times of the first and second peaks detected from measurements made at the second terminal.

The difference between (tn2-tm1) and (tm2-tn1) may be compared to a threshold to determine the faulty half-section (or midpoint). The threshold value may be determined according to the sampling frequency. For example, for a 1MHz sample, the threshold may be 1 microsecond or 2 microseconds. The threshold may be predetermined (e.g., set by a person). Once it is determined that the fault is not at the midpoint, another comparison may be performed to identify the faulty half. Here, one of the first half and the second half is identified as a faulty half. This identification can be done by checking which of the two quantities (i.e., (tn2-tm1) or (tm2-tn1)) has the higher value. For example, if (tn2-tm1) is greater than (tm2-tn1), the fault may be identified in the first half, and if (tm2-tn1) is greater than (tn2-tm1), the fault may be identified in the second half.

The faulty half (or midpoint) identification is used to estimate fault location. From the fault being identified in the first half, in the second half or at the midpoint, the arrival times of the first and second peaks at the first and second terminals and the length of the transmission line may be used to estimate the fault location.

If the fault is identified as being in the first half, the fault location (d1) can be estimated by the following equation:

if a fault is identified in the second half, the fault location (d2) can be estimated by the following equation:

of the above, tm1, tm2, tn1, and tn2 are arrival times of the first peak and the second peak detected from measurements made at the first terminal and the second terminal, respectively, and L is the length of the power transmission line (line length).

In the event that a fault location is identified as a midpoint, the fault location may be estimated by taking the average of two fault locations, with a first fault location estimated for a fault in the first half of the line (e.g., d1) and a second fault location estimated for a fault in the second half of the line (e.g., d 2).

The method described above may be implemented with one or more devices associated with a power transmission line. The device may include a power system device such as a relay, an Intelligent Electronic Device (IED), or a fault locator and/or a server connected with the power system device.

In case the method is implemented with an IED or a relay, the device may be associated with the bus M or the bus N or other point in the line. Here, the apparatus estimates/receives parameters for fault localization required parameters for fault localization from other power system apparatuses. For example, the IED at the bus M may obtain the traveling wave related parameter from the measurement at the bus M and receive the traveling wave related measurement at the bus N from another IED or power system device. In this example, the IED may receive one or more signals from the measurement device and obtain measurements from the signals, or the measurement device issues measurements over a bus (e.g., a process bus) and the IED (e.g., registered to receive data from such bus) receives measurements over the bus. The travelling wave detection may alternatively be performed at another power system device and the obtained measurements (or parameters) may be transmitted to an IED or server implementing the method.

Thus, the steps of the method may be performed by one or more modules. Modules may be implemented by one or more processors. For example, in an example where the IED performs the method, the module is implemented with a processor of the IED. In another example where the server performs the method, the module is implemented with a processor of the server. In case the method is implemented partly by the IED and partly by the server, the modules (depending on the steps) will be distributed in the IED and the server, respectively.

In one embodiment, the module includes a traveling wave detector, a faulty half-part identifier and a fault locator. The traveling wave detector is used to obtain a plurality of parameters associated with the traveling wave detected from the measurements made at the first and second terminals, such as the arrival times of the first and second peaks. The faulty half identifier is used for identifying that one of the first half, the second half and the middle point of the power transmission line is faulty. The fault locator is used to estimate the fault location based on the identification of the first half, second half, and midpoint as having a fault.

Drawings

The subject matter of the invention will be explained in more detail below with reference to exemplary embodiments shown in the drawings, in which,

fig. 1(a) and 1(b) show Bewley mesh diagrams (Bewley lattice diagram) for faults in the first and second halves of a transmission line;

fig. 2 is a flow chart of a method for fault location in a power transmission line according to an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 3 is a simplified block diagram of an apparatus for fault location according to an embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 4 is a simplified representation of a system for fault location according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Detailed Description

The invention provides a method independent of line parameters. In other words, the invention provides a parameter-free fault location based on traveling waves for the transmission line. The system and method of the present invention does not require experimentation to calibrate the propagation speed for deployment of fault locating solutions.

Fig. 1(a) shows a Bewley grid diagram in the case when a fault has occurred in the first half of the line. In this case, on the bus M side, for the traveling wave generated from the fault point, the first peak and the second peak arrive from the fault point (i.e., not as reflections from the N side). On the bus N side, for a traveling wave generated from a fault point, a first peak arrives from the fault point, and a second peak arrives from the far-end bus (i.e., from the M side) as a result of the reflected wave shown.

The fault location may be calculated in the following manner. From the Bewley grid diagram of fig. 1(a), we can write:

where t0 is the fault start time or time at which the fault was detected and tm1 and tm2 are the first peak arrival time and the second peak arrival time at the bus M; tn1 and tn2 ═ a first peak arrival time and a second peak arrival time at bus N; and d1 is the fault location in the case of a fault in the first half of the line.

Solving equations (1) and (2), and fault localization given by equation (3)

Fig. 1(b) shows a Bewley grid diagram in the case when a fault has occurred in the second half of the line. In this case, on the bus M side, the first peak arrives from the fault point and the second peak arrives from the far-end bus (i.e., from the N side), and on the bus N side, the first peak and the second peak arrive from the fault point. Here, the fault location may be calculated in the following manner. From the Bewley grid diagram of fig. 1(b), we can write:

where tm1 and tm2 are the first and second peak arrival times at bus M; tn1 and tn2 ═ first and second peak arrival times at bus N; and d2 if the fault is located in the second half of the fault.

Solving equations (4) and (5), and fault localization given by equation (6)

Therefore, we need to select the actual fault location from the two fault location estimates calculated using equations (3) and (6). To this end, we need to know whether the fault has occurred in the first half or the second half of the line.

Faulty half (or sector) identification:

the faulty half (i.e., the first half from bus M to the midpoint, or the second half from bus N to the midpoint) can be determined by comparing the arrival times of the peaks detected at bus M and bus N.

From equations (1) and (2) we derive

(tn2-tm1)＝L (7)

(tm2-tn1)＝4d1-L (8)

Comparing equation (7) and equation (8) gives the following relationship (9)

(tn2-tm1)＞(tm2-tn1)→L＞4d1-L (9)

Here, if the difference between the second arrival time measured at the bus N and the first arrival time measured at the bus M is always larger than the difference between the second arrival time measured at the bus M and the first arrival time measured at the bus N under the condition (0< L/4 < L/2), the failure in the first half (or section) can be identified.

We can identify the faulty half by using the following relationship:

(tn2-tm1) - (tm2-tn1) ≦ e → fault in the middle of line (10)

(tn2-tm1) > (tm2-tn1) → fault in the first half of the line (11)

(tn2-tm1) < (tm2-tn1) → fault in the back half of the line (12)

In the above, e is a small threshold and is approximately zero. The threshold may be determined according to the sampling frequency. For example, for a 1MHz sample, the threshold may be 1 microsecond or 2 microseconds. The threshold may be predetermined (e.g., set by a person).

Referring now to fig. 2, fig. 2 is a flow diagram of a method for fault location in a power transmission line according to an embodiment of the invention.

At 202, traveling wave parameters are obtained. In case the fault locators shown in fig. 1(a) and 1(b) are used to implement the method, the travelling wave may be detected by the fault locator at bus M (first terminal) and the fault locator at bus N (second terminal), respectively. Alternatively, a traveling wave detector may be used to detect the traveling wave and obtain its parameters (e.g., arrival time, peak width, rise time, etc.). The traveling wave detector can be a standalone device (connected to a measurement apparatus such as a CT at the bus M) or a module (e.g., 302) implemented with a processor of an electrical system device.

According to some embodiments (e.g., using the embodiments illustrated in fig. 1(a) and 1 (b)), first and second peak arrival times (tm1 and tm2) at bus M and first and second peak arrival times (tn1 and tn2) at bus N are obtained.

The method also includes identifying the faulty half or midpoint as having a fault. A faulty half-section (or midpoint) of the line is identified as having a fault based on a comparison of the arrival times of the first and second peaks at bus M and bus N, respectively. In the embodiment of FIG. 2, at 204, the difference between (tn2-tm1) and (tm2-tn1) is compared to a threshold (e.g., e) to identify a faulty half-part.

For example, it may be determined whether (tn2-tm1) is greater than (tm2-tn 1). accordingly, it may be determined whether the fault is located in the first half or second half of the line (see description above). according to the illustrated example, the first half refers to the portion of the line from bus M to the midpoint, which has a length of L/2, and similarly the second half refers to the portion from bus N to the midpoint, which also has a length of L/2.

If the fault is identified in the first half based on the comparison at 206, C (3) may be used at 208 to estimate the fault location (d1), i.e., the fault location

If the fault is identified in the second half based on the comparison at 206, C (6) may be used to estimate the fault location at 210 (d2), i.e., C (6) may be used

If the fault location is identified at 204 as being at the midpoint (i.e., near the midpoint region), then according to an embodiment, the fault location is estimated by (d1+ d2)/2, as shown at 212.

As described above, the method may be implemented by one or more devices associated with the power transmission line, such as an IED (or fault locator), a relay, or other such power system device. According to the embodiments shown in fig. 1(a) and 1(b), the method is implemented with a fault locator at bus M or with a fault locator at bus N. Alternatively, two fault locators may implement the method. Here, the fault locator at bus M obtains a traveling wave measurement at bus M, and similarly the fault locator at bus N obtains a traveling wave measurement at bus N. In this example, the IED may receive one or more signals from a measurement device (here a CT as shown in fig. 1(a) or fig. 1 (b)) and obtain measurements therefrom, or the measurement device issues measurements over a bus (e.g., a process bus) and the IED (e.g., registered to receive data from such a bus) receives measurements over the bus. The fault locators communicate with each other via standard communication. Thus, the fault locator at bus M sends information related to the traveling wave to the fault locator at bus N (and vice versa).

The steps of the method may be performed by one or more modules. A module may be implemented with one or more processors. For example, in an example where the fault locator performs the method, the modules are implemented with a processor of the fault locator (either the fault locator at bus M, or the or each fault locator at bus N). Such an embodiment is shown in fig. 3. Here, the apparatus (300) comprises a travelling wave detector (302), a faulty half-part identifier (304) and a fault locator (306). As described above, the traveling wave detector obtains traveling wave parameters. The module may additionally detect the traveling wave from the measurement and obtain the parameters accordingly. The faulty half-section identifier identifies the faulty half section or midpoint (area) as having a fault, and the fault locator locates the fault based on the faulty half-section identification and the traveling wave parameters

Fig. 10 shows an example of the server (402) performing the method. In this embodiment, the module is implemented by a processor of the server. In case the method is implemented partly by an IED and partly by a server, the modules (depending on the steps) will be distributed in the IED and the server, respectively. For example, the traveling wave detector may be located at a different fault locator (e.g., 404, 406) that obtains the traveling wave parameters and passes the traveling wave parameters to a server having a faulty half-part identifier and fault locator. The fault location may be communicated to a fault location for display.

The invention thus provides fault localization based on double ended traveling waves using only arrival time and line length. This eliminates the need to use line parameters (propagation speed or wave speed) and thus improves the accuracy of fault location.