阅读说明：本技术 用于聚合物和聚合物复合材料的超声焊接的设备 (Apparatus for ultrasonic welding of polymers and polymer composites ) 是由 P.王 T.H.李 B.J.布拉斯基 于 2020-09-23 设计创作，主要内容包括：提供一种用于一个或多个部件的工件的超声焊接的设备。该设备包括焊头,该焊头配置成接触工件并将能量传递到工件。焊头包括柄和设置在柄的面对工件的端部处的尖端。尖端具有一面,该面具有在该面处形成弯曲表面的尖端半径。在穿过弯曲表面的面上形成滚花。(An apparatus for ultrasonic welding of a workpiece of one or more components is provided. The apparatus includes a welding head configured to contact the workpiece and transfer energy to the workpiece. The welding tip includes a shank and a tip disposed at an end of the shank facing the workpiece. The tip has a face with a tip radius forming a curved surface at the face. Knurling is formed on the face passing through the curved surface.)

1. An apparatus for ultrasonic welding of a workpiece of one or more parts, the apparatus comprising:

a welding tip configured to contact the workpiece and transfer energy to the workpiece, the welding tip comprising:

a handle;

a tip disposed at an end of the shank facing the workpiece, the tip having a face with a tip radius such that the tip has a curved surface at the face; and

knurling on the face through the curved surface.

2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the knurls are defined by a knurl angle and a knurl pitch.

3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the shank is cylindrically shaped and the tip is shaped as a sector of a truncated sphere.

4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the tip radius defines the tip as a convex geometry extending from the shank.

5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein:

the weld head has a weld head radius along the shank, an

Wherein the knurls have a geometry proportional to the tip radius and the horn radius.

6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the horn has a horn radius along the shank, wherein a ratio of the tip radius to the horn radius is in a range of about 4 to about 5.

7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the knurls comprise a plurality of teeth arranged at a knurl pitch, wherein a ratio of the knurl pitch to the horn radius is in a range of about 0.09 to about 0.13.

8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein:

the knurl comprises a plurality of teeth; and

each tooth has a knurl angle in the range of about 40 degrees to about 60 degrees.

9. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the knurl angle is measured from a side of a tooth to a plane extending through a plane perpendicular to a centerline of the horn.

10. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein:

the shank having a horn radius (R);

the face having a tip radius (r);

the knurls have a knurl pitch (d);

the welding head is defined by R/R-4-5 and d/R-0.09-0.13; and

the knurls have a knurl angle of 40-60 degrees.

Technical Field

The present disclosure relates generally to welding, and more particularly to ultrasonic welding of polymers and polymer composites using an apparatus having a horn with optimized knurls (knurl) and optimized horn (horn) tip surface radii.

Background

Welding is one of the most common forms of joining parts. Ultrasonic welding is commonly used to join polymeric parts, especially those made of thermoplastic materials, and may also be used to join metallic parts. In ultrasonic welding, a plastic or metal part is sandwiched between a welding horn and an anvil. In order to perform welding using ultrasonic energy, high-frequency vibration is applied to components to be joined by high-frequency vibration of a welding head. A horn, which may also be referred to as an sonotrode, is a broad term for a tool that generates ultrasonic vibrations that are applied to a workpiece or material, for example for welding, machining or mixing. In the case of welding, component joining occurs due to the mechanical force applied and the heat generated at the interface between the components by the mechanical vibrations.

The use of ultrasonic welding to provide consistent weld quality requires overcoming a number of challenges. Process variables including clamping load, vibration amplitude and welding time must be set precisely, and variations in stack height and material must be taken into account. In plastic welding, the clamping force must be kept low enough to avoid part deformation, while harder materials require higher clamping loads. If the clamping force is too low or misalignment occurs, insufficient weld (weld) formation may result.

Accordingly, it is desirable to provide an apparatus for ultrasonic welding that is designed to efficiently and effectively overcome the associated challenges. Furthermore, other desirable features and characteristics of the present invention will become apparent from the subsequent detailed description and the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and the foregoing technical field and background.

Disclosure of Invention

An apparatus for ultrasonic welding of workpieces is provided that may include a plurality of components. In various embodiments, an apparatus includes a welding head configured to contact a workpiece and transmit energy to the workpiece. The welding head includes a shank (shank) and a tip disposed at an end of the shank facing the workpiece. The tip has a face with a tip radius forming a curved surface at the face. Knurling is formed on the face passing through the curved surface.

In further embodiments, the knurls are defined by a knurl angle and a knurl pitch (pitch).

In further embodiments, the shank is cylindrically shaped and the tip is shaped as a sector of a truncated sphere (sector).

In further embodiments, the tip radius defines the tip as a convex geometry extending from the shank.

In further embodiments, the horn has a horn radius along the shank. The knurls have a geometry that is proportional to the tip radius and the horn radius.

In further embodiments, the horn has a horn radius along the shank. The ratio of the tip radius to the horn radius is in the range of about 4 to about 5.

In further embodiments, the knurls include a plurality of teeth arranged at a knurl pitch. The ratio of knurl pitch to horn radius is in the range of about 0.09 to about 0.13.

In further embodiments, the knurls include a plurality of teeth. Each tooth has a knurl angle in the range of about 40 degrees to about 60 degrees.

In further embodiments, the knurl angle is measured from a side of the tooth to a plane extending through a plane perpendicular to the centerline of the weld head.

In further embodiments, the workpiece includes at least one of a polymer composite and a polymer material.

In various other embodiments, an apparatus for ultrasonic welding of workpieces includes one or more components, the apparatus including a horn configured to contact a workpiece and transfer vibrational energy to the workpiece. The horn includes a shank having a transverse dimension. The tip is disposed at an end of the shank facing the workpiece and has a face with a tip radius. The tip radius defines the tip as a convex geometry extending from the shank. Knurling is formed on the face.

In further embodiments, the handle is cylindrically shaped. The transverse dimension is the horn radius and the tip is shaped as a sector of a truncated sphere.

In further embodiments, the horn has a horn radius along the shank. The convex geometry is defined as being proportional to the tip radius and horn radius.

In further embodiments, the transverse dimension is a horn radius along the shank. The ratio of the tip radius to the horn radius is in the range of about 4 to about 5.

In further embodiments, the knurls include a plurality of teeth arranged at a knurl pitch. The ratio of knurl pitch to horn radius is in the range of about 0.09 to about 0.13.

In further embodiments, the knurls include a plurality of teeth. Each tooth has a knurl angle in the range of about 40 degrees to about 60 degrees.

In further embodiments, the knurl angle is measured from a side of the tooth to a plane extending through a plane perpendicular to the centerline of the weld head.

In further embodiments, the shank has a tip radius (R), the face has a tip radius (R), the knurls have a knurl pitch (d), the tip is defined by R/R-4-5 and d/R-0.09-0.13, and the knurls have a knurl angle of 40-60 degrees.

In further embodiments, the transverse dimension is a horn radius along the shank. The ratio of the tip radius to the horn radius is in the range of about 4 to about 5. The knurls include a plurality of teeth arranged at a knurl pitch. The ratio of knurl pitch to horn radius is in the range of about 0.09 to about 0.13. Each tooth has a knurl angle of about 40 degrees to about 60 degrees.

In various other embodiments, an apparatus for ultrasonic welding of a workpiece of one or more components includes a horn configured to contact the workpiece and transfer energy to the workpiece. The welding head includes a shank having a tip disposed at an end of the shank facing the workpiece. The tip has a knurled surface. The shank has a tip radius (R), the face has a tip radius (R), the knurls have a knurl pitch (d), the tip is defined by R/R-4-5 and d/R-0.09-0.13, and the knurls have a knurl angle of 40-60 degrees.

Drawings

Exemplary embodiments will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the following drawing figures, wherein like numerals denote like elements, and wherein:

FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of an ultrasonic welding apparatus according to various embodiments;

fig. 2 is a schematic view of a welding horn of the apparatus of fig. 1, in accordance with various embodiments;

fig. 3 is an end view of a face of the welding horn of fig. 2, in accordance with various embodiments;

FIG. 4 is a partial cross-sectional view taken generally through line 4-4 of FIG. 3, in accordance with various embodiments;

FIG. 5 is a schematic illustration of knurling of the weld face of FIG. 3, in accordance with various embodiments;

FIG. 6 is a graphical representation of a weld area on the vertical axis relative to various tip radius options on the horizontal axis;

FIG. 7 is a graphical representation of a weld area on the vertical axis relative to various knurl angle options on the horizontal axis; and

fig. 8 is a graphical representation of the weld area on the vertical axis and various knurl pitch options on the horizontal axis.

Detailed Description

The following detailed description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the application and uses. Furthermore, there is no intention to be bound by any expressed or implied theory presented in the preceding technical field, background, brief summary or the following detailed description.

As disclosed herein, ultrasonic welding is accomplished by an optimally designed welding horn. Ultrasonic welding of relatively hard plastics for structural applications, such as certain polymers and polymer composites including carbon fiber reinforced polyamide 6 and the like, has been found to represent unique challenges. As described in the present disclosure, the design of the weld head is optimized to avoid consequences such as slippage and consistently produce good weld bead size and strength. In various embodiments described herein, a welding horn may include a knurled tip, wherein each knurled element has an optimal pitch height and angle to produce a desired welding effect. In addition, unlike conventional flat-tipped horns, the welding horns disclosed herein may have a tip curvature that is optimized for the desired weld formation.

Referring to fig. 1 and 2, an ultrasonic type welding apparatus 20 is shown. The apparatus 20 includes a horn 22 and an anvil 24 between which the horn 22 and anvil 24 sandwich a workpiece 26 comprising one or more components. In this example, the workpiece 26 includes two components 28, 30 to be welded together. In other embodiments, fewer or more workpieces may be included. The anvil is supported against movement by the fixture 32. The apparatus 20 includes an ultrasonic stack 34, the ultrasonic stack 34 including a horn 22 and a transducer/booster 36. The converter/booster 36 converts the electrical signal into mechanical vibrations 38 and generates a magnitude of the vibrations 38. The horn 22 applies vibrations 38 to the components 28, 30. The vibration frequency is typically in the range of 20-40 khz. The motion of the vibration 38 at the horn face 40 is transferred to the two components 28, 30. The vibrations 38 move through the member 28 and create frictional and viscoelastic deformations at the interface 43 between the members 28, 30. As a result, heat is generated at the interface 43, which melts the material, which upon cooling forms a weld that fuses the components 28, 30 together.

Generally, the welding head 22 has a shank 23 and a tip 25 at an end 27 of the shank 23 facing a workpiece 26. In the present embodiment, the horn 22 has a face 40 rounded at the tip, creating a convex geometry that results in the clamping force and vibration 38 being applied to the parts 28, 30 over a smaller area than a flat horn tip. It has been found that the higher force to area ratio produced is beneficial for welding harder materials. The face 40 has a tip radius (r)42 and is generally shaped as a spherical truncated sector. The tip radius 42 creates a curvature such that the face 40 is convex in nature and thicker at its horn centerline 46 than its outer edge, the face 40 including the curved surface 41. Tip radius 42 may accommodate misalignment, such as a slight deviation from perpendicular between horn 22 and member 28. The body 44 of the horn 22 is generally cylindrical at its shank 23 and is formed about a centerline 46, with a horn radius (R)48 being the transverse dimension at the shank 23 of the horn 22. The radius 48 is continuous along the shank 23 at least at a section adjacent the tip 25 and defines the shank 23 as a solid cylinder centered on the centerline 46. Radius 48 of horn 22 determines the overall peripheral dimension of face 40, and tip radius 42 may vary, as described further below.

Details of face 40 of horn 22 are shown in fig. 3 and 4. The face 40 includes knurls 50 formed by a plurality of knurl elements as evenly distributed individual teeth 52. In the current embodiment, the knurls 50 are rows and columns of teeth 52 separated by grooves (groovees) formed in a diamond pattern on the face 40. In other embodiments, the knurls 50 can be formed in a pattern of diagonal lines, straight lines, circular shapes, a combination thereof, or another pattern. The teeth 52 each project outwardly from the face 40 and are each formed in a pyramid shape, and specifically in this example are a rectangular pyramid. In other embodiments, the teeth 52 may be formed in other shapes, such as a triangle, a cone, or another shape.

A plurality of teeth 52 are schematically shown in fig. 5. The teeth 52 are separated from each other by a uniform knurl pitch (d)54 in each direction along a row or column of knurls 50. The knurl pitch 54 is the distance from the center 56 of one tooth 52 to the center 58 of an adjacent tooth 52. Each tooth 52 also has a knurled angle (θ) 65. The knurl angle 65 is the angle between each side 62 of the tooth 52 and a plane 64 extending through the face 40 perpendicular to the centerline 46 of the horn 22. The knurl pitch 54 and knurl angle 65 determine the dimensions of the teeth 52, including the height (h) 66.

It has been found that the design variables of horn 22, including the geometry of knurls 50 and tip radius 42, affect weld performance. It has been found that reducing weld head slip with certain optimized weld head geometries can result in improved weld quality. Experimental analysis has been performed including investigation of the welding performance of three geometric options of the horn 22 in ultrasonic welding of polymer composites with two workpieces stacked, each having a thickness of 3 mm. Table 1 shows the specifications of three geometry options a, B and C.

Options for	Tip radius 42 (millimeter)	Knurling angle 65 (degree)	Knurling Pitch 54 (millimeter)
				A	32.74	30	0.75
B	36.69	45	1.00
				C	40.64	60	1.25

TABLE 1

Experimental analysis results of welds formed by horn 22 according to options a, B and C are shown in fig. 6-8, with a trigger force of 250 newtons, a horn speed of 0.25 mm/sec, and an amplitude range of 100 microns (+ -50 μm). Specifically, according to options a, B and C, the size of the weld area formed at a particular welding time is shown with variations in tip radius 42, knurl angle 65 and knurl pitch 54. Fig. 6-8 show the weld area (in square millimeters) on the vertical axes 70, 72, 74 at a weld time of 0.6 seconds compared to the specifications of options a, B, and C on the horizontal axes 80, 82, 84 for each tip radius 42 in fig. 6, knurl angle 65 in fig. 7, and knurl pitch 54 in fig. 8.

With respect to tip radius 42 of horn 22, as shown in fig. 6, option a results in a weld area of about 55 square millimeters, option B results in a weld area of about 28 square millimeters, and option C results in a weld area of about 37 square millimeters. These results show that for a tip radius 42 at a weld time of 0.6 seconds, option a results in a preferred maximum weld area. Fig. 7 shows that for the knurl angle 65 of the horn 22, option a results in a weld area of about 24 square millimeters, option B results in a weld area of about 48 square millimeters, and option C results in a weld area of about 47 square millimeters. These results show that option B results in the preferred maximum weld area for the knurl angle 65 at a weld time of 0.6 seconds. Fig. 8 shows that for the knurl pitch 54 of the horn 22, option a results in a weld area of about 48 square millimeters, option B results in a weld area of about 38 square millimeters, and option C results in a weld area of about 34 square millimeters. These results show that for a knurl pitch 54 with a weld time of 0.6 seconds, option a results in a preferred maximum weld area.

Additional experiments have been performed at various weld times, including 0.7 seconds, 0.8 seconds, and 0.9 seconds. In each case, it has been determined that option a of tip radius 42 produces the largest weld area, option B of knurl angle 65 produces the largest weld area, and option a of knurl pitch 54 produces the largest weld area. In other words, the smallest evaluation tip radius 42, the medium size evaluation knurl angle 65, and the smallest evaluation knurl pitch 54 produce the best results. Accordingly, the optimized horn 22 has a tip radius 42 of about 32.74 millimeters, an optimized knurl angle 65 of about 45 degrees, and an optimized knurl pitch 54 of about 0.75 millimeters. It is also shown that a larger tip radius 42 produces a significantly smaller weld area, a 60 degree knurl angle 65 produces results approximately as good as a 45 degree knurl angle, while a larger knurl pitch 54 distance produces a significantly smaller weld area compared to knurl pitch 54 of option a.

It has also been found that the dimensions of horn 22 affect the optimum values of tip radius 42 and knurl pitch 54. Thus, the optimal tip radius 42 and the optimal knurl pitch 54 may be related to the size of horn 22, and in particular to horn radius 48. Experimental results can be inferred, with the horn 22 being defined in terms of angles and proportions. As indicated above, the preferred knurling angle for the horn 22 is about 40-60 degrees. Additionally, using a 7 millimeter horn radius 48, the ratio of tip radius 42 to horn radius 48 (R/R) may be defined by an optimal range of 4.0 to 5.0 and by a preferred ratio of 4.66. Likewise, the ratio of knurl pitch 54 to horn radius 48(d/R) may be defined by an optimal range of 0.09 to 0.13 and by a preferred ratio of 0.11. Accordingly, it has been found that the optimized horn 22 has a knurl angle 65 of 40-60 degrees, a ratio of tip radius 42 to horn radius 48 of 4.0-5.0, and a ratio of knurl pitch 54 to horn radius 48 of 0.09-0.13. The ratio of knurl pitch 54 to horn radius 48(d/R), and tip radius 42 determine the number of knurl teeth 52 on face 40. It has been found that an optimized horn 22 produces a larger weld area, in part due to reduced slip and optimal energy transfer to the workpiece interface 43.

Accordingly, the apparatus for ultrasonic welding includes optimized geometries to produce desired weld characteristics. While at least one exemplary embodiment has been presented in the foregoing detailed description, it should be appreciated that a vast number of variations exist. It should also be appreciated that the exemplary embodiment or exemplary embodiments are only examples, and are not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the disclosure in any way. Rather, the foregoing detailed description will provide those skilled in the art with a convenient road map for implementing the exemplary embodiment or exemplary embodiments. It should be understood that various changes can be made in the function and arrangement of elements without departing from the scope of the disclosure as set forth in the appended claims and the legal equivalents thereof.