阅读说明：本技术 一种导航雷达模拟训练效果评价方法 (Evaluation method for simulation training effect of navigation radar ) 是由 姚烨 车春宇 冯翔宇 朱怡安 练彬 于 2020-05-27 设计创作，主要内容包括：本发明公开了一种导航雷达模拟训练效果评价方法,包括：获取评价指标对应的导航雷达模拟训练数据；获取导航雷达评估属性指标；对导航雷达评估属性指标进行简化处理,获得导航雷达评估属性指标；根据CART决策树算法的二分特点,对导航雷达决策属性进行泛化处理；根据决策属性泛化数据,通过决策树Gini系数计算方法,得到导航雷达决策属性Gini系数；根据导航雷达决策属性Gini系数,生成导航雷达模拟训练CART决策树,通过导航雷达模拟训练CART决策树分类,获得学员导航雷达模拟训练效果评价结果。本发明通过建立了四级评价指标,提出了基于CART决策树导航雷达学员学习效果评价方法,可实现在综合评价指标的基础上使用评价方法给予雷达学员个性化评估结果。(The invention discloses a method for evaluating a simulation training effect of a navigation radar, which comprises the following steps: acquiring navigation radar simulation training data corresponding to the evaluation index; acquiring a navigation radar evaluation attribute index; simplifying the evaluation attribute index of the navigation radar to obtain the evaluation attribute index of the navigation radar; according to the dichotomy characteristic of the CART decision tree algorithm, carrying out generalization treatment on the navigation radar decision attribute; obtaining a navigation radar decision attribute Gini coefficient through a decision tree Gini coefficient calculation method according to the decision attribute generalization data; and generating a navigation radar simulation training CART decision tree according to the navigation radar decision attribute Gini coefficient, and classifying through the navigation radar simulation training CART decision tree to obtain the evaluation result of the trainee navigation radar simulation training effect. According to the invention, through establishing a four-level evaluation index, the evaluation method for the learning effect of the radar student based on the CART decision tree navigation is provided, and the evaluation method can be used for providing a personalized evaluation result for the radar student on the basis of the comprehensive evaluation index.)

1. A method for evaluating the simulation training effect of a navigation radar is characterized by comprising the following steps:

according to a four-level student evaluation index system, acquiring navigation radar simulation training data corresponding to evaluation indexes in the student simulation training process;

acquiring a navigation radar evaluation attribute index from the navigation radar simulation training data;

simplifying the evaluation attribute index of the navigation radar to obtain the evaluation attribute index of the navigation radar;

according to the dichotomy characteristic of the CART decision tree algorithm, carrying out generalization processing on the navigation radar decision attribute to obtain decision attribute generalized data;

obtaining a navigation radar decision attribute Gini coefficient through a decision tree Gini coefficient calculation method according to the decision attribute generalization data;

and generating a navigation radar simulation training CART decision tree according to the navigation radar decision attribute Gini coefficient, and classifying through the navigation radar simulation training CART decision tree to obtain the evaluation result of the trainee navigation radar simulation training effect.

2. The evaluation method for the simulation training effect of the navigation radar as claimed in claim 1, wherein the fourth-class student evaluation index system comprises:

first-order evaluation indexes: learning attitude, learning efficiency and learning effect;

secondary evaluation indexes are as follows: login times, learning time, self-learning completion, average learning time interval and teaching completion corresponding to learning attitude, self-learning speed corresponding to learning efficiency, and self-learning achievement and examination achievement corresponding to learning effect;

three-level evaluation indexes: logging times, theoretical knowledge self-learning time corresponding to learning time, simulated training self-learning time, theoretical knowledge self-learning completion degree corresponding to self-learning completion degree, simulated training self-learning completion degree, average learning time interval, theoretical knowledge teaching corresponding to teaching completion degree, theoretical knowledge self-learning speed corresponding to self-learning speed, simulated training self-learning speed, theoretical knowledge self-learning achievement corresponding to self-learning achievement, simulated operation self-learning achievement, theoretical knowledge examination achievement corresponding to examination achievement and simulated operation examination achievement;

four-stage evaluation index: log-in times, chapter self-learning time corresponding to theoretical knowledge self-learning time, operation self-training time corresponding to simulated training self-learning time, exercise question number of chapters corresponding to theoretical knowledge self-learning completion degree, simulated operation training times corresponding to simulated training self-learning completion degree, average learning time interval, theoretical knowledge learning chapter number corresponding to theoretical knowledge teaching, chapter learning rate corresponding to theoretical knowledge self-learning speed, operation learning rate corresponding to simulated training self-learning speed, core accuracy, basic accuracy, professional accuracy, common sense accuracy corresponding to theoretical knowledge self-learning result, core accuracy, basic accuracy, professional accuracy, common sense accuracy corresponding to simulated operation self-learning result, core score, basic score, etc. corresponding to theoretical knowledge examination result, Professional score, general knowledge score, core score, basic score, professional score, general knowledge score corresponding to the performance of the simulated operation examination.

3. The evaluation method for the simulation training effect of the navigation radar according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the evaluation of the attribute index by the navigation radar comprises: landing times, radar component structure learning time, radar part learning time, startup and shutdown training time, ranging lateral training time, anti-interference training time, average learning time interval, radar component structure knowledge point viewing times, radar part knowledge point viewing times, startup and shutdown training error times, ranging lateral training error times, anti-interference training error times, radar component structure assessment basis scores, radar component structure assessment core scores, radar component structure assessment professional scores, radar component structure assessment score general knowledge, radar component assessment basis scores, radar component assessment core scores, radar component assessment professional scores, radar component assessment general knowledge scores, startup and shutdown scores, ranging lateral scores, and anti-interference scores.

4. The evaluation method for the simulation training effect of the navigation radar according to claim 3, wherein the simplifying processing is performed on the evaluation attribute index of the navigation radar to obtain the evaluation attribute index of the navigation radar, and specifically comprises:

averaging the radar composition structure learning time, the radar part learning time, the startup and shutdown training time, the ranging lateral training time and the anti-interference training time, and simplifying the averaging into average learning duration;

averaging the radar composition structure knowledge point viewing times and the radar component knowledge point viewing times, and simplifying the average learning times into theoretical learning average learning times;

averaging the radar startup and shutdown training time, the ranging lateral training time and the anti-interference training operation error times, and simplifying the averaging to be simulation operation average error times;

the radar component structure assessment basic score, the radar component structure assessment core score, the radar component structure assessment professional score, the radar component structure assessment general knowledge score, the radar component assessment basic score, the radar component assessment core score, the radar component assessment professional score, the radar component assessment general knowledge score, the startup and shutdown score, the ranging lateral score and the anti-interference score are summed, and the sum is simplified into the radar assessment score;

the simplified navigation radar evaluation attribute indexes are navigation radar decision attribute indexes, and the method comprises the following steps: login times, average learning duration, average learning time interval, theoretical learning average learning times, simulation operation average error times and radar assessment scores.

5. The evaluation method for the simulation training effect of the navigation radar according to claim 4, wherein the obtaining of the Gini coefficient of the decision attribute of the navigation radar through a Gini coefficient calculation method of a decision tree according to the decision attribute generalization data specifically comprises:

when the number of trainees in the trainee ranking category corresponding to the generalization result excellence corresponding to the assessment score is 49, 19, 68, 27, and when the number of trainees in the trainee ranking category corresponding to the generalization result general corresponding to the assessment score is 29, 11, 39, 20,

the Gini coefficients of the excellent assessment score and the general assessment score are respectively as follows:

two subsets T_iAnd T_jRespectively regarding the evaluation scores as subsets, and the Gini coefficient for obtaining the evaluation scores is as follows:

。

Technical Field

The invention relates to the technical field of electronic information, in particular to a navigation radar simulation training effect evaluation method.

Background

The radar occupies an important position in modern war, and in the navigation radar simulation training process, each student is an independent individual and needs to be subjected to personalized evaluation according to the personalized characteristics of each student. However, it is complicated to evaluate the learning effect and training effect of the trainees. In the process of self-learning operation of the navigation radar by the radar trainees, the instructor cannot perform accurate hand-holding guidance for each trainee, so that the instructor cannot carefully master the learning process of the trainees. Therefore, various factors need to be considered in the evaluation process, and the trainee should be evaluated from various angles, such as learning attitude, learning effect, and the like. However, a complete personalized evaluation index is not established for the navigation trainees at present. In a word, the navigation radar teaching lacks scientific and practical evaluation on the training result, the operation and assessment are mostly based on the subjective judgment of a teacher, and the evaluation result is not objective enough, so that the simulation training system with perfect examination and assessment functions is the key for solving the problems.

Disclosure of Invention

The embodiment of the invention provides a method for evaluating a simulation training effect of a navigation radar, which is used for solving the problems in the background art.

The embodiment of the invention provides a method for evaluating a simulation training effect of a navigation radar, which comprises the following steps:

according to a four-level student evaluation index system, acquiring navigation radar simulation training data corresponding to evaluation indexes in the student simulation training process;

acquiring a navigation radar evaluation attribute index from the navigation radar simulation training data;

simplifying the evaluation attribute index of the navigation radar to obtain the evaluation attribute index of the navigation radar;

according to the dichotomy characteristic of the CART decision tree algorithm, carrying out generalization processing on the navigation radar decision attribute to obtain decision attribute generalized data;

obtaining a navigation radar decision attribute Gini coefficient through a decision tree Gini coefficient calculation method according to the decision attribute generalization data;

and generating a navigation radar simulation training CART decision tree according to the navigation radar decision attribute Gini coefficient, and classifying through the navigation radar simulation training CART decision tree to obtain the evaluation result of the trainee navigation radar simulation training effect.

Further, the fourth-class student evaluation index system comprises:

first-order evaluation indexes: learning attitude, learning efficiency and learning effect;

secondary evaluation indexes are as follows: login times, learning time, self-learning completion, average learning time interval and teaching completion corresponding to learning attitude, self-learning speed corresponding to learning efficiency, and self-learning achievement and examination achievement corresponding to learning effect;

three-level evaluation indexes: logging times, theoretical knowledge self-learning time corresponding to learning time, simulated training self-learning time, theoretical knowledge self-learning completion degree corresponding to self-learning completion degree, simulated training self-learning completion degree, average learning time interval, theoretical knowledge teaching corresponding to teaching completion degree, theoretical knowledge self-learning speed corresponding to self-learning speed, simulated training self-learning speed, theoretical knowledge self-learning achievement corresponding to self-learning achievement, simulated operation self-learning achievement, theoretical knowledge examination achievement corresponding to examination achievement and simulated operation examination achievement;

four-stage evaluation index: log-in times, chapter self-learning time corresponding to theoretical knowledge self-learning time, operation self-training time corresponding to simulated training self-learning time, exercise question number of chapters corresponding to theoretical knowledge self-learning completion degree, simulated operation training times corresponding to simulated training self-learning completion degree, average learning time interval, theoretical knowledge learning chapter number corresponding to theoretical knowledge teaching, chapter learning rate corresponding to theoretical knowledge self-learning speed, operation learning rate corresponding to simulated training self-learning speed, core accuracy, basic accuracy, professional accuracy, common sense accuracy corresponding to theoretical knowledge self-learning result, core accuracy, basic accuracy, professional accuracy, common sense accuracy corresponding to simulated operation self-learning result, core score, basic score, etc. corresponding to theoretical knowledge examination result, Professional score, general knowledge score, core score, basic score, professional score, general knowledge score corresponding to the performance of the simulated operation examination.

Further, the navigation radar evaluates the attribute index, including: landing times, radar component structure learning time, radar part learning time, startup and shutdown training time, ranging lateral training time, anti-interference training time, average learning time interval, radar component structure knowledge point viewing times, radar part knowledge point viewing times, startup and shutdown training error times, ranging lateral training error times, anti-interference training error times, radar component structure assessment basis scores, radar component structure assessment core scores, radar component structure assessment professional scores, radar component structure assessment score general knowledge, radar component assessment basis scores, radar component assessment core scores, radar component assessment professional scores, radar component assessment general knowledge scores, startup and shutdown scores, ranging lateral scores, and anti-interference scores.

Further, the simplifying processing is performed on the navigation radar evaluation attribute index to obtain the navigation radar evaluation attribute index, and the method specifically includes:

averaging the radar composition structure learning time, the radar part learning time, the startup and shutdown training time, the ranging lateral training time and the anti-interference training time, and simplifying the averaging into average learning duration;

averaging the radar composition structure knowledge point viewing times and the radar component knowledge point viewing times, and simplifying the average learning times into theoretical learning average learning times;

averaging the radar startup and shutdown training time, the ranging lateral training time and the anti-interference training operation error times, and simplifying the averaging to be simulation operation average error times;

the radar component structure assessment basic score, the radar component structure assessment core score, the radar component structure assessment professional score, the radar component structure assessment general knowledge score, the radar component assessment basic score, the radar component assessment core score, the radar component assessment professional score, the radar component assessment general knowledge score, the startup and shutdown score, the ranging lateral score and the anti-interference score are summed, and the sum is simplified into the radar assessment score;

the simplified navigation radar evaluation attribute indexes are navigation radar decision attribute indexes, and the method comprises the following steps: login times, average learning duration, average learning time interval, theoretical learning average learning times, simulation operation average error times and radar assessment scores.

Further, the obtaining of the navigation radar decision attribute Gini coefficient by the decision tree Gini coefficient calculation method according to the decision attribute generalized data specifically includes:

when the number of trainees in the trainee ranking category corresponding to the generalization result excellence corresponding to the assessment score is 49, 19, 68, 27, and when the number of trainees in the trainee ranking category corresponding to the generalization result general corresponding to the assessment score is 29, 11, 39, 20,

the Gini coefficients of the excellent assessment score and the general assessment score are respectively as follows:

two subsets T_iAnd T_jRespectively regarding the evaluation scores as subsets, and the Gini coefficient for obtaining the evaluation scores is as follows:

。

the embodiment of the invention provides a method for evaluating the simulation training effect of a navigation radar, which has the following beneficial effects compared with the prior art:

the invention provides a navigation radar simulation training effect evaluation method based on the functional structure analysis of a real navigation radar and combined with the requirements of teaching cognition and simulation training of a teacher and a student in radar teaching, establishes a four-level evaluation index aiming at the problem of evaluation of the navigation radar simulation training effect, provides a navigation radar student learning effect evaluation method based on a CART decision tree, and can realize the purpose of using the evaluation method to give a radar student personalized evaluation result on the basis of comprehensive evaluation indexes.

Drawings

Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of a CAET decision tree for learning effect of a learner according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Detailed Description

The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.

Fig. 1 provides a method for evaluating a simulation training effect of a navigation radar according to an embodiment of the present invention, where the method includes:

step 1: according to a four-level student evaluation index system, acquiring navigation radar simulation training data corresponding to evaluation indexes in the student simulation training process;

step 2: acquiring a navigation radar evaluation attribute index from the navigation radar simulation training data;

and step 3: simplifying the evaluation attribute index of the navigation radar, and determining a decision attribute index of the navigation radar;

and 4, step 4: according to the dichotomy characteristic of the CART decision tree algorithm, carrying out generalization processing on the navigation radar decision attribute to obtain decision attribute generalized data;

and 5: obtaining a navigation radar decision attribute Gini coefficient through a decision tree Gini coefficient calculation method according to the decision attribute generalization data;

step 6: and generating a navigation radar simulation training CART decision tree according to the navigation radar decision attribute Gini coefficient, and classifying through the navigation radar simulation training CART decision tree to obtain the evaluation result of the trainee navigation radar simulation training effect.

The specific process of the steps 1-6 is as follows:

1. student learning effect evaluation index system construction method

The system processes all index levels given by the navigation radar trainees to obtain the personalized evaluation of the simulation training effect of the navigation radar trainees. And finally determining an evaluation index system by analyzing the phenomenon that the evaluation is carried out in the past navigation radar teaching evaluation and the process is not emphasized. The system sets up four-level evaluation indexes. And then, determining the weight of each level of index by adopting an analytic hierarchy process, aiming at realizing the fair and reasonable evaluation of the learning effect of the student. Through the evaluation index system, the learning effect of the trainees can be basically and comprehensively mastered. The radar student evaluation index system in the navigation radar simulation training system is shown in table 1.

TABLE 1 evaluation index System

2. Learning effect evaluation method based on CART decision tree evaluation model

The decision tree is a machine learning algorithm based on a tree structure and classified from top to bottom. The CART decision tree algorithm designed by the invention is a binary classification algorithm in a decision tree. The shape of the tree generated by the CART decision tree algorithm is a binary tree. The idea of CART decision tree generation is to continuously classify the dataset two times until it cannot be subdivided. The criterion technology of CART decision tree classification is Gini coefficient. The Gini coefficient is a data index that can be calculated and can be found from training data. If the data can be classified into M classes in the current data set, the probability of classifying each class is assumed to be p_mThen Gini (p) is defined as follows:

the magnitude of the Gini index can be used to judge the accuracy of the generated binary tree, and when the Gini index is smaller, the judgment is more accurate. Therefore, it is necessary to obtain the minimum Gini index as a classification standard in the design process.

The method for evaluating the navigation radar trainees by the CART decision tree is described as follows:

for step 5, the CART decision tree uses the GINI coefficient to select a partition attribute, and in the candidate set radaratattribute _ list, selects an attribute that minimizes the GINI coefficient after partitioning as an optimal partition attribute. For example, if the attribute GINI coefficient of the assessment score is minimum, this is taken as the start node.

And according to the established personalized evaluation index, the navigation radar evaluation attribute corresponding to the personalized evaluation index can be obtained. The evaluation indexes are continuously collected by the student in the learning process, so that the evaluation indexes are beneficial to the individual evaluation of the student based on the decision attributes of the individual evaluation indexes when the evaluation is carried out. The evaluation of the navigation radar trainee is shown in table 2.

TABLE 2 navigation Radar evaluation Attribute

According to table 2, before generalizing the index when evaluating the excellent, good, medium and poor performance grades, the similar index is calculated and simplified into a value. The five indexes of the radar composition structure learning time, the radar part learning time, the startup and shutdown training time, the ranging lateral training time and the anti-interference training time can be simplified into the average learning duration T _ average.

T_average＝(T_Sz+T_Sb+T_onoff+T_range+T_echo)/5

The radar composition structure knowledge point viewing times and the radar component knowledge point viewing times are reduced to the theoretical learning average learning times N _ Lx.

N_Lx＝(N_Lz+N_Lb)/2

The method comprises the following steps of radar startup and shutdown training time, ranging lateral training time and anti-interference training misoperation times. The average failure times F _ average of the simulation operations can be unified.

F_average＝(F_onoff+F_range+F_echo)/3

The radar component structure assessment basic score, the radar component structure assessment core score, the radar component structure assessment professional score, the radar component structure assessment general knowledge score, the radar component assessment basic score, the radar component assessment core score, the radar component assessment professional score, the radar component assessment general knowledge score, the startup and shutdown score, the ranging lateral score and the anti-interference score are reduced to the radar assessment score Sc _ Kh in a unified mode.

Sc_Lx＝Sc_Zj+Sc_Zh+Sc_Zz+Sc_Zc+Sc_Bj+Sc_Bh+Sc_Bz+Sc_Bc+Sc_onoff+Sc_range+Sc_e cho

The simplified indices are shown in table 3, leaving only 6 indices. Login times, average learning duration, average learning time interval, theoretical learning average learning times, simulation training average error times and radar assessment scores. The simplified indexes can reflect the learning and thinking of the navigation radar learner in the teaching process, and meanwhile, the depth of the navigation radar learner can be reduced through simplifying the target, so that the data is preprocessed equivalently.

TABLE 3 navigation Radar decision Attribute

According to the dichotomy characteristic of the CART decision tree algorithm, after all the decision attributes of the navigation radar trainees are classified into excellent and general, the decision attributes can be obtained as shown in the table 4.

TABLE 4 summary of data

According to the data in the table, the assessment score is taken as an example, and the assessment score has two types of excellent scores and general scores, so that the following can be calculated:

two subsets T_iAnd T_jThe evaluation scores are regarded as subsets of the evaluation scores respectively, and Gini can be obtained as:

3. result of CAET decision tree calculation for student learning effect

The Gini values of other attributes can be found according to the above method, and thus a CART decision tree can be found as shown in fig. 1.

The finally generated CART decision tree can be used for showing that the navigation radar simulation training assessment method has usability, and the CART decision tree assessment model designed aiming at the system can be effectively applied to actual simulation training assessment.

The above disclosure is only a few specific embodiments of the present invention, and those skilled in the art can make various modifications and variations of the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, and it is intended that the present invention encompass these modifications and variations as well as others within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.