阅读说明：本技术 用于基于电极晶体结构改变而操作电池的系统和方法 (System and method for operating a battery based on electrode crystal structure changes ) 是由 Y.戈林 J.F.克里斯琴森 A.苏巴拉曼 R.克莱因 于 2019-06-26 设计创作，主要内容包括：提供了用于基于电极晶体结构改变而操作电池的系统和方法。一种电池包括：在超出阈值电位进行锂化时展现晶体结构改变的电极,以及电池管理系统。电池管理系统包括控制器,该控制器配置成在电池在线的同时,确定阈值电位,基于所确定的阈值电位而确定电池操作参数,并且基于所确定的电池操作参数而操作电池。(Systems and methods for operating a battery based on electrode crystal structure changes are provided. A battery includes: electrodes that exhibit a change in crystal structure upon lithiation beyond a threshold potential, and battery management systems. The battery management system includes a controller configured to determine a threshold potential while the battery is online, determine a battery operating parameter based on the determined threshold potential, and operate the battery based on the determined battery operating parameter.)

1. A battery, comprising:

an electrode exhibiting a change in crystal structure upon lithiation beyond a threshold potential;

a battery management system comprising a controller configured to, while the battery is online:

determining a threshold potential;

determining a battery operating parameter based on the determined threshold potential; and is

Operating the battery based on the determined battery operating parameter.

2. The battery of claim 1, wherein the determination of the threshold potential comprises identifying an operating characteristic indicative of an internal state of the electrode.

3. The battery of claim 2, wherein the determination of the threshold potential comprises:

charging the battery to a first potential that exceeds a threshold potential, discharging the battery from the first potential, and storing a first discharge curve in a memory; and

the method includes charging the battery to a second potential that does not exceed the threshold potential, discharging the battery from the second potential, and storing a second discharge curve in a memory.

4. The battery of claim 3, wherein the identification of the operating characteristic comprises identifying at least one feature present in the first discharge curve that is missing in the second discharge curve.

5. The battery of claim 4, wherein the determination of the threshold potential further comprises:

performing charge and discharge cycles to a plurality of different cut-off potentials; and

determining a threshold potential based on corresponding discharge curves from the plurality of charge and discharge cycles.

6. The battery of claim 5, wherein determining the threshold potential based on the discharge curves from the plurality of charge and discharge cycles comprises selecting a lowest cutoff potential of a plurality of cutoff potentials as the threshold potential at which the corresponding discharge curve does not include the at least one feature.

7. The battery of claim 6, wherein the threshold potential is determined to be within 2 mV.

8. The battery of claim 1, wherein the determination of the battery operating parameter comprises selecting a state of charge curve based on the determined threshold potential and a charge cutoff potential from a last charge.

9. The battery of claim 1, wherein the determination of the battery operating parameter comprises adapting a boundary condition of the charging process based on the determined threshold potential.

10. The battery of claim 9, wherein the determination of the battery operating parameter comprises selecting a charging target potential within 2mV of the threshold potential.

11. A method of operating a battery using a battery management system, the method comprising:

while the battery is online:

determining a threshold potential, wherein an electrode of the battery exhibits a crystal structure change upon lithiation beyond the threshold potential;

determining a battery operating parameter based on the determined threshold potential; and

operating the battery based on the determined battery operating parameter.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the determination of the threshold potential comprises identifying an operating characteristic indicative of an internal state of the electrode.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the determination of the threshold potential comprises:

charging the battery to a first potential that exceeds the threshold potential, discharging the battery from the first potential, and storing a first discharge curve in the memory; and

the method includes charging the battery to a second potential that does not exceed the threshold potential, discharging the battery from the second potential, and storing a second discharge curve in the memory.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the identifying of the operating characteristic includes identifying at least one feature present in the first discharge curve that is missing in the second discharge curve.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the determining of the threshold potential further comprises:

performing charge and discharge cycles to a plurality of different cut-off potentials; and

determining a threshold potential based on corresponding discharge curves from the plurality of charge and discharge cycles.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein determining the threshold potential based on the discharge curves from the plurality of charge and discharge cycles comprises selecting a lowest cutoff potential of a plurality of cutoff potentials as the threshold potential at which the corresponding discharge curve does not include the at least one feature.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein the threshold potential is determined to be within 2 mV.

18. The method of claim 11, wherein the determination of the battery operating parameter comprises selecting a state of charge curve based on the determined threshold potential and a charge cutoff potential from a last charge.

19. The method of claim 11, wherein the determination of the battery operating parameter comprises adapting a boundary condition of the charging process based on the determined threshold potential.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein the determination of the battery operating parameter comprises selecting a charging target potential within 2mV of the threshold potential.

Technical Field

The present disclosure relates generally to batteries, and more particularly to battery management systems for batteries.

Background

Several new battery chemistries are entering the market to provide the capabilities necessary in specialized applications. Once, the lithium ion battery market has been driven by the use of such batteries in portable electronic devices that require high energy but only limited life and power. Recently, other industries have focused on the use of batteries. By way of example, batteries are commonly incorporated into power tools and certain types of hybrid electric vehicles. Each new industry requires different performance characteristics. Certain applications, such as automotive applications, require battery stability in terms of battery safety for both large packages and long lifetimes (e.g., at least 10 to 15 years).

Lithium ion batteries have become an industry standard in both electric vehicle and portable electronic device applications. Lithium ion batteries operate based on the movement of lithium ions between a negative electrode (also referred to as an "anode") and a positive electrode (also referred to as a "cathode"). Current negative electrodes are based on graphite, which is intercalated with lithium and has a density of 372mAh/g_{Graphite (II)}The gravimetric capacity (gravimetric capacity) of (1). Silicon is alloyed with lithium due to its ability to achieve 3579mAh/g_SiThe ability to weight-specific density (gravimetric density) has been identified as a potential negative electrode material. However, at present, pure silicon is used asIt has proven challenging to be a negative electrode due to the high volume expansion rate that occurs during the lithiation process of pure silicon. Nevertheless, some current batteries will have small amounts of pure silicon or silicon-containing materials such as silicon oxide (SiO) or silicon alloys (sibs)₃、Si₂Fe、TiSi₂And others)) are incorporated into graphite-based negative electrodes to increase the gravimetric specific capacity of the negative electrode above the level of pure graphite.

Lithium ion batteries are typically coupled to a Battery Management System (BMS) during operation of the battery. The BMS generally includes a controller that executes program instructions stored in a memory to operate the battery to control the rate at which the battery is charged and discharged based on a known model of the operating parameters of the battery.

What is needed, therefore, is an improved way to design BMS strategies based on measurable characteristics in order to improve the cycle life of lithium ion batteries and reduce defects that may occur due to volume expansion during the lithiation process.

Disclosure of Invention

A battery includes an electrode that exhibits a change in crystal structure when lithiated beyond a threshold potential, and a battery management system. The battery management system includes a controller configured to determine a threshold potential while the battery is online, determine a battery operating parameter based on the determined threshold potential, and operate the battery based on the determined battery operating parameter.

In an embodiment of the battery, the determination of the threshold potential comprises identifying an operating characteristic indicative of an internal state of the electrode.

In another embodiment, the determination of the threshold potential comprises: charging the battery to a first potential that exceeds a threshold potential, discharging the battery from the first potential, and storing a first discharge curve in a memory; and charging the battery to a second potential that does not exceed the threshold potential, discharging the battery from the second potential, and storing a second discharge curve in the memory.

In a further embodiment, the identification of the operating characteristic includes identifying at least one feature present in the first discharge curve that is missing in the second discharge curve.

In some embodiments of the battery, the determining of the threshold potential further comprises performing charge and discharge cycles to a plurality of different cutoff potentials, and determining the threshold potential based on corresponding discharge curves from the plurality of charge and discharge cycles.

In some embodiments, determining the threshold potential based on the discharge curves from the plurality of charge and discharge cycles may comprise selecting a lowest cut-off potential of the plurality of cut-off potentials as the threshold potential, where the corresponding discharge curve does not comprise the at least one feature.

In one embodiment, the threshold potential is determined to be within 2 mV.

In some embodiments, the determination of the battery operating parameter includes selecting a state of charge curve based on the determined threshold potential and a charge cutoff potential from a last charge.

In a further embodiment, the determination of the battery operating parameter comprises adapting a boundary condition of the charging process based on the determined threshold potential.

In a further embodiment, the determination of the battery operating parameter includes selecting a charging target potential within 2mV of the threshold potential.

In another embodiment, a method of operating a battery using a battery management system includes determining a threshold potential while the battery is online, wherein an electrode of the battery exhibits a crystal structure change upon lithiation beyond the threshold potential. The method also includes determining a battery operating parameter based on the determined threshold potential and operating the battery based on the determined battery operating parameter.

Drawings

Fig. 1 is a schematic view of a battery pack according to the present disclosure.

Fig. 2 is a schematic view of a battery cell of the battery pack of fig. 1 having an electrode exhibiting a crystal structure change.

Fig. 3 is a graph of lithiation and delithiation versus capacity curves for a silicon electrode composed of silicon and a conductive additive, showing the difference in delithiation curves after lithiation to 10mV or 60 mV.

Fig. 4 is a graph of lithiation and delithiation versus capacity curves for a half-cell test of silicon-containing electrodes, showing the difference in delithiation curves after lithiation to 10mV or 60 mV.

Fig. 5 is a graph of lithiation and delithiation versus capacity in Ah curves for a full cell test of a lithium ion battery having a silicon-containing negative electrode, showing the difference between delithiation curves after lithiation above the crystal structure change potential and after lithiation below the crystal structure change potential.

Fig. 6 depicts a series of three experiments by visualizing the measured potential versus time to demonstrate how the potential at which crystal structure changes occur can be identified within 2mV accuracy.

Fig. 7 depicts a flow diagram of a model optimization process that uses the potential of crystal structure changes to identify model parameters for a BMS.

Fig. 8 depicts a flowchart of a process that uses detection of crystal structure changes to improve model voltage prediction and SOC estimation accuracy in a BMS.

Detailed Description

For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the embodiments described herein, reference is now made to the drawings and to the description below in written specification. No limitation on the scope of the subject matter is intended by reference. The present disclosure also includes any alterations and modifications to the illustrated embodiments, and includes further applications of the principles of the described embodiments as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which this document relates.

Various operations may be described as multiple discrete actions or operations in turn, in a manner that is most helpful in understanding the claimed subject matter. However, the order of description should not be construed as to imply that these operations are necessarily order dependent. In particular, these operations may not be performed in the order of presentation. The operations described may be performed in a different order than the described embodiments. Various additional operations may be performed and/or described operations may be omitted in additional embodiments.

The terms "comprising," "including," "having," and the like, as used with respect to embodiments of the present disclosure, are synonymous. As used herein, the term "approximately" refers to a value that is within ± 10% of a reference value.

The embodiments of the present disclosure discussed below are applicable to any desired battery chemistry. For purposes of illustration, some examples relate to lithium ion batteries. As used herein, the term "lithium ion battery" refers to any battery that includes lithium as an active material. In particular, lithium ion batteries include, without limitation, lithium-based liquid electrolytes, solid electrolytes, colloidal electrolytes, and batteries generally referred to as lithium polymer batteries or lithium ion polymer batteries. As used herein, the term "colloidal electrolyte" refers to a polymer impregnated with a liquid electrolyte.

Referring now to fig. 1, a battery pack 100 includes a plurality of battery cells 102 disposed in a pack housing 104. Each battery cell 102 includes a cell housing 106 with a positive terminal 108 and a negative terminal 112 exposed from the cell housing 106. In a parallel arrangement, the positive terminals 108 may be connected to each other by a current collector 116, and the negative terminals 112 may be connected to each other by a different current collector 120. In a series arrangement, the positive terminal 108 may be connected to the adjacent negative terminal 112 by a current collector. The current collectors 116, 120 are connected to respective positive and negative battery pack terminals 124, 128, and the positive and negative battery pack terminals 124, 128 are connected to an external circuit 132, which external circuit 132 may be powered by the battery pack 100 or may be configured to charge the battery pack 100.

In addition, the battery pack 100 includes a Battery Management System (BMS) 140 that includes a controller 144, a memory unit (not shown), and in some embodiments, one or more sensors (not shown). The operation and control of the battery pack 100 are performed with the aid of the BMS 140. The controller 144 of the BMS 140 is implemented with a general or special purpose programmable processor executing programmed instructions. The instructions and data necessary to perform the programmed functions are stored in memory units associated with the controller. The processor, memory, and interface circuits configure the controller 144 to operate the battery pack 100 to charge and discharge the battery to desired charge and discharge thresholds within desired charge and discharge rates, as well as to otherwise operate the battery pack 100. The processor, memory and interface circuit assembly may be provided on a printed circuit card or as circuitry in an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC). Each circuit may be implemented using a separate processor, or multiple circuits may be implemented on the same processor. Alternatively, the circuit may be implemented using circuits provided in VLSI circuits or discrete components. The circuits described herein may also be implemented using a combination of processors, ASICs, discrete components or VLSI circuits. Further discussion of the BMS and electrochemical model-based BMS may be found, for example, in U.S. patent No. 8,188,715 issued on day 29, 5/2012, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

Each cell 102 includes the electrode configuration 200 illustrated in fig. 2, the electrode configuration 200 including a positive electrode current collector 204, a positive electrode layer 208, a separator layer 212, a negative electrode 216, and a negative electrode current collector 220. In some embodiments, the multiple layers of the electrode configuration 200 are stacked on top of each other so as to form an electrode stack. In other embodiments, electrode configuration 200 is wound around itself in a helical shape to form an electrode configuration referred to as a "jelly roll" or "swiss roll" configuration.

The positive electrode current collector 204 connects the positive terminal 108 of the battery cell 102 with the positive electrode 208 to enable the flow of electrons between the external circuit 132 and the positive electrode 208. Likewise, a negative electrode current collector 220 connects the negative terminal 112 with the negative electrode layer 216. In the illustrated embodiment, the negative electrode layer 216 includes graphite in combination with one or more of silicon (Si), silicon oxide (SiO), and a silicon alloy such as a silicide. In another embodiment, negative electrode layer 216 includes different materials that undergo a change in crystal structure during lithiation and delithiation.

When the battery pack 100 is connected to an external circuit 132 powered by the battery pack 100, lithium ions are separated from electrons in the negative electrode 216. The lithium ions travel through the separator 212 and into the positive electrode 208. Free electrons in the battery create a positive charge in the battery and then flow from the negative electrode 216 through the negative electrode current collector 220 to the negative terminal 112 of the battery cell 102. The electrons are then collected by the package current collector 120 and transmitted to the package terminal 128. The electrons flow through the external circuit 132 to provide power to the external circuit 132, and then pass through the positive battery pack terminal 124, through the positive battery pack terminal 116, and back into the battery cell 102 via the positive terminal 108, where the electrons are collected by the positive electrode current collector 204 and distributed into the positive electrode 208. The electrons returned to the positive electrode 208 are associated with lithium ions that have crossed the separator 212. Connecting the battery pack 100 to an external circuit that charges the battery pack 100 causes the opposite flow of electrons and lithium ions.

When one of the electrodes comprises a material that undergoes a crystal structure change during lithiation or delithiation, such as silicon or a silicon-based material, the OCP/SOC or OCP-capacity relationship exhibits different electrochemical properties compared to an electrode material that does not undergo a crystal structure change.

Fig. 3 depicts lithiation and delithiation curves for a silicon electrode including silicon and a conductive additive. In graph 300 of fig. 3, curve 304a represents lithiation of the silicon electrode to an off potential of 0.010V, while curve 308a represents lithiation of the silicon electrode to an off potential of 0.060V.

As depicted in fig. 3, when the silicon is lithiated to 10mV (curve 304 a), the delithiation curve 304b has a plateau region 304c at ~ 0.42V when the silicon is lithiated to 60mV or above (e.g., curve 308 a), the delithiation curve 308b lacks a plateau region and instead has a continuous ramp feature 308c between 0.20 and 0.45V this observed change in the delithiation curves 304b, 308b is due to a change in the crystal structure of the silicon that occurs during lithiation at a potential applied below ~ 55mV, the region in which the crystal structure change occurs is designated as region 1 and labeled by circle 312, while the region in which the difference between the two delithiation curves is observed is designated as region 2 and labeled by arrow 316.

In a similar manner, the difference in delithiation curves can also illustrate the difference between an electrode that has undergone a crystal structure change and an electrode that has not. Fig. 4 illustrates a "half-cell" test of the delithiation curve of a negative electrode comprising a mixture of graphite and SiO. Fig. 4 is a graph 400 illustrating lithiation and delithiation versus capacity curves for an electrode using a mixture comprising SiO and graphite, the electrode being extracted from a commercially available battery in 18650 format, and the extracted electrode being cycled for lithium metal.

In the graph 400 of fig. 4, curve 404a represents lithiation of the electrode to 1mV, while curve 404b represents delithiation of the negative electrode after lithiation to 1 mV. Curve 408a represents the lithiation of the electrode to 60mV, while curve 408b represents the delithiation of the negative electrode after lithiation to 60 mV. When silicon or silicon-based materials are lithiated below approximately 55mV, as in curve 404a, the materials undergo a crystal structure change (marked by circle 412). The change in the crystal structure of the material results in a delithiation curve 404b that is different from a silicon or silicon-based material that is lithiated to a higher cut-off voltage at or above 55mV (such as 60mV lithiation represented by curves 408a and 408 b).

The delithiation curve 404b has a plateau 416 at approximately 0.44V when the negative electrode is lithiated to 1 mV. In contrast, when the lithiation of the negative electrode stops at or above 60mV, the delithiation curve 408b of the negative electrode lacks plateau regions and instead has a continuous ramp feature 418 between 0.24V and 0.5V. As such, there is a difference between delithiation curves 404b and 408b, represented by arrow 420. The difference 420 between the plateau 416 at approximately 0.44V and the curves 404b, 408b is due to a change in the crystal structure of silicon, and as will be discussed in detail below, this difference in the delithiation curve can be used to partially validate the electrochemical model of a cell comprising a silicon-based material.

In conventional batteries, based on previous literature and initial experimental data, the potential at which the battery undergoes a crystal structure change is generally assumed to correspond to approximately 55 mV. However, as illustrated in fig. 4, in the mixed silicon-graphite negative electrode, the two regions on the delithiation curve are separated from each other due to the presence of the graphite material. Determining a change in crystal structure of a hemimonomer with greater accuracy than a conventional estimate of 55mV by varying the cut-off voltage from 70mV to 50mVElementary potential (also known as

) Is possible. In some embodiments, the crystal structure change is determined to be within 2mV, while in other embodiments the crystal structure change is determined to be within 1 mV.

Fig. 5 illustrates a graph 500 of a "full cell test" in which a commercial battery is charged to two different potentials at a constant current of 2C. One charge potential resulted in a measurable characteristic of the cell when delithiated, demonstrating that the charge potential was high enough to cause a crystal structure change to occur. The full cell test illustrated in fig. 5 was performed on a commercially available 18650 cell in which the negative electrode comprised graphite mixed with SiO.

A first curve 504a shows a first charging process in which the cell is charged to a potential of 4.35V, which results in lithiation of the negative electrode to a level below approximately 55 mV. As seen in fig. 5, the charging process of the first curve 504a results in a resting full cell potential 504c of 4.07V.

On the other hand, the second curve 508a shows a curve where the battery was charged to a potential of 3.95V, which corresponds to the cessation of lithiation of the negative electrode at a potential greater than 55 mV. The charging process depicted by the second curve 508a results in a resting full cell potential 508c of approximately 3.95V.

Due to the additional charging of the battery in the first curve 504a (marked by circle 512), during discharge of the cell at a rate of C/10, the discharge curve 504b of the first charging process exhibits a difference from the discharge curve 508b of the battery charged by the second process (represented by curve 508 a). This difference visible at location 516 in graph 500 may be attributed to the difference in delithiation after the electrode has undergone a change in crystal structure. Thus, the charging condition of the first curve 504a causes a change in the crystal structure in the silicon material, while the charging condition of the second curve 508a does not cause a change in the crystal structure in the silicon. Using the experiments shown in fig. 4 and 5, the full-cell potential at which the crystal structure change occurred can be correlated with the half-cell potential of the negative electrode.

Parameterization and validation of electrochemical cell models is a challenging task. Parameterization typically requires electrical testing and specialized electrochemical testing across the operational regulations of the cell. Typically, the signals that can be used to quantify the performance of the battery model are voltage and temperature. Due to the significantly large number of parameters necessary to simulate an electrochemical model, many parameters are fitted to match model predictions to available experimental data. Challenges in optimization problems include the presence of local minima, insufficient data quality for identifying certain model parameters, and structural challenges in the model that make it difficult or impossible to uniquely identify certain parameters. Thus, different sets of parameters may result in similar voltage and temperature predictions from the model.

The accuracy of the fitted parameters and the quality of the model can be determined by parameter-specific electrochemical experiments. However, such experiments may be time consuming, and for some parameters, available methods may not be directly applicable or well refined. An alternative to further evaluate the quality of the model is to measure the internal state of the cell, such as the negative electrode and electrolyte potentials. Acquisition of such measurements typically requires a specialized cell design with multiple reference electrodes. However, in the case of a battery containing an active material exhibiting a crystal structure change, it is possible to partially verify the prediction of the internal state of the model by detecting a feature indicating the crystal structure change, as described above with reference to fig. 3 to 5.

Fig. 6 is a graph 600 depicting three exemplary charge-discharge cycles 604, 608, 612, wherein the charge potential varies with the following objectives: the charge potential at which the crystal structure change first occurred was identified within 2 mV. Starting from approximately 0% SOC on the first cycle, the cell is charged with constant current until the off potential is reached

And then the cell is discharged at a slow rate (e.g., C/10) until the cell reaches a potential of 2.5V to observe the presence or absence of features associated with the change in crystal structure. Increasing or decreasing the cut-off potential after completion of the discharge

And then repeating the charging and discharging sequence.

In a first charge cycle 604, the battery is charged to a potential V of 4.2V₁. The cell is then discharged, and as illustrated in fig. 6, the corresponding discharge curve does not exhibit a characteristic (at 616) indicative of a change in crystal structure (e.g., difference 516 discussed above with reference to fig. 5). In a second charge cycle 608, the battery is charged to a higher potential V₂For example 4.3V. The cell is discharged again and this time the cell exhibits a difference 620 in the discharge curve indicative of a change in the crystal structure. In a third charge cycle 612, the battery is charged to V₁And V₂Potential V between₃(e.g., 4.25V), and then discharging the battery. As seen in fig. 6, the discharge during the third charge cycle 612 also exhibits a characteristic 620 indicative of a change in crystal structure. As such, the electrode undergoes a crystal structure change between 4.20V and 4.25V.

The process illustrated in fig. 6 may be repeated for a desired number of cycles to achieve a desired accuracy. At cut-off potential

At a potential V^*(V in the illustrated experiment₁) Depicts that no crystal change is detected in the subsequent discharge cycle, but forThe crystal change characteristic is detected. Potential V obtained from the result^*Extracting the relevant internal state (negative electrode potential V)_neg) And is brought to the half cell potential as determined above with reference to fig. 3-5Is compared to known values of (c).

FIG. 7 depicts a flow diagram 700 of a model optimization process that uses the potential of crystal structure changes to identify a model parameter according to the present disclosureAnd (4) better fitting. OCP for each electrode_OAnd SOC_OThe inherent thermodynamic relationship between depends on the material properties that typically do not change. However, as illustrated above with reference to fig. 3 and 4, materials in which the crystal structure is changed have different thermodynamic relationships that can be changed during use of the cell.

Due to the relationship between OCP and SOC or capacity for materials exhibiting crystal structure changes, detection of crystal structure changes may be used to partially verify the internal state of the battery cell. The verification process includes subjecting the silicon to a potential at which the crystal structure changes based on an electrochemical cell model using a similar method as discussed above with respect to fig. 4 and 5

Is determined (block 704). Specifically, the battery is charged to a cell potential known to cause a change in the crystal structure and a cell potential known not to cause a change in the crystal structure. Between the two charging processes, the difference (e.g., difference 516 illustrated in fig. 5) in the delithiation curves (e.g., curves 504b and 508 b) is used to determine a predictable characteristic that may be observed in the discharge curve of the battery after a change in crystal structure has occurred, as compared to the discharge after no change in crystal structure has occurred. When using electrochemical models, BMS is based on full cell potentials and parameters such as V_negAnd the like, operate. Alternatively, in other embodiments, the BMS may operate under the electrochemical model based only on the full cell potential or only on the internal state.

Accordingly, based on the electrochemical cell model determined in block 704, features based on the internal state of the cell may be predicted (block 708). For example, the BMS may be configured to determine: when the potential changes at a specific point on the curve at approximately 5mV from the curve for which no crystal structure change occurred, a feature indicating a crystal structure change of the battery electrode exists. In another embodiment, the BMS determines the feature in the case where the potential varies from the curve for which no crystal structure change occurs at a specific point on the curve by approximately 10 mV. In various embodiments, the threshold potential difference may be any value between approximately 5mV and approximately 10mV, depending on the capacity ratio between graphite and Si or SiO. In other embodiments, the BMS may be programmed with another desired threshold potential difference that indicates a crystal structure change characteristic based on the particular chemistry of the electrode and the battery.

In further embodiments, the BMS identifies the feature indicative of the crystal structure change by, for example, identifying a rapid change in the potential-based estimated SOC of the silicon oxide. In one particular embodiment, the threshold identified for such SOC-based features would be an approximate or exact 5% deviation from the capacity-based SOC change.

Further, the battery cell may be cycled to various charge cutoff potentials in a similar manner as described above with reference to fig. 6 (block 712). Comparing the curves with one another to determine the charge cut-off potential V^*The highest potential at which no crystal change occurs, and the negative electrode potential V_negIt is the lowest potential at which the crystal structure change is detected (block 716). The determined charge cut-off potential can be compared to a potential predicted from an electrochemical model

Comparing to verify the predicted internal state. Based on lithiation potential determined from electrochemical cell models

(Block 704) with V identified from V, I and T data_neg(block 712), the model parameters may be updated to better predict the internal state of the battery cell based on different charging processes (block 720), and the updated parameters may be used for subsequent iterations of the method 700.

In one embodiment, the detection of crystal structure changes can be incorporated directly in the planning of the optimization problem to fit the model parameters. Typically, the following optimization problem is presented:

whereinJIs a function of the cost of the received signal,xandzrefers to the differential and algebraic states of the model,f、g、hrefers to a function that forms the structure of an electrochemical model,iit refers to the number of experiments,

is referred to asiThe initial conditions of the secondary experiments were as follows,is the result of an optimization problem and is assembled

Upper and lower limits for parameter variations are defined. Deriving functions from physics-based Li-ion battery models including coupled partial differential equations using model reduction techniquesf、g、h。

For simplicity, experimental subscripts are omitted in the following sectionsi. The output of the model is

And the experimental measurement is

. The structure of the cost function is typically. However, by using experiments that identify the potential at which the crystal structure change occurs, the cost function can be modified to include more information about the internal state of the system. For example, in one such modification,

wherein if for a given cycle a structural change is detected

And if no structural change is detected. Function(s)

Is an indicator function for crystal structure changes that maps to 0 or 1 and depends on the model state, and

is the weight. For a function

An example structure of (a) would be: if at a certain time during chargingThen, then

And otherwise is 0, wherein

Is a vector ofzIs in the state (1). Thus, the BMS is configured to select or incorporate an appropriate model based on the detection of the crystal structure change.

In some embodiments, BMS operating parameters are updated based on detected changes in crystal structure while the battery is in service (otherwise referred to as online). In particular, in various embodiments, crystal structure changes are detected to improve the accuracy of voltage prediction and SOC estimation, improve voltage prediction and power prediction accuracy, adapt battery limits for battery life and control battery aging behavior, and/or optimize fast charging algorithms for Li-ion batteries.

FIG. 8 depicts a flowchart example of a process 800 for improving model voltage prediction and SOC estimation accuracy based on detection of crystal structure changes. During operation of the battery, the electrochemical cell model is used to estimate the state of charge of the battery by, for example, the process described above with reference to fig. 5 and block 704 (block 804). When using an electrochemical model, the BMS can be based on the full cell potential and internal state(such as V)_negWhich is equivalent to the half cell potential of the anode). In other embodiments, the BMS may operate based on the full cell potential or the internal state of the battery. From the experimental data, certain characteristics of the discharge curve are determined (block 808) that are relevant to: whether a crystal structure change has occurred during a charging process for a battery having a negative electrode comprising Si, SiO, Si alloy, or other material that can undergo a crystal structure change.

The observed change in characteristics can be attributed to a change in the OCP of the battery cell during delithiation of the negative electrode. Thus, the internal states associated with the structural changes are used to determine which delithiation boundary curve of the negative electrode is used for the model predicted for the subsequent model (block 812). In particular, when the electrode of the battery has undergone a crystal structure change, a state of charge curve and a power prediction are determined from the curve based on the determined crystal structure change, whereas when the electrode has not undergone a crystal structure change, the state of charge and power prediction are based on the curve for no crystal structure change.

Advantageously, the disclosed BMS may thus provide more accurate model-specific voltage and state-of-charge predictions than in conventional BMS systems. Since the algorithm for power prediction in the BMS relies on a model for accurate voltage prediction, improving the quality of the voltage prediction model by detecting and accounting for crystal structure changes leads to improved power prediction capabilities for the BMS.

Also, since the algorithm for accurate SOC estimation relies on voltage error feedback between the model predicted voltage 820 and the measured cell voltage 824 (block 816), improving the model quality while the battery is online by detecting structural changes in the negative electrode results in a more accurate estimation of the battery SOC.

The BMS is configured to control the internal state (e.g., V) of the battery_neg) The charging current of (a) charges the battery to maintain the current and the current integral (i.e., capacity) within a specified range, thereby also maintaining the potential in a desired range. Since the disclosed BMS operation provides more accurate SOC determination, charging is performedThe electrical current is more precisely controlled to maintain the potential in a desired range.

In another embodiment, the BMS is configured to optimize operational regulations of the battery in order to reduce battery aging over the life of the battery. The battery is operated by the BMS to gradually reduce the maximum charge cutoff potential or applied constant voltage over the life of the battery. For cells exhibiting crystal structure changes, detection of crystal structure changes may be used to adapt the boundary conditions of the operational regime. In one particular embodiment, the detection of crystal structure changes and lithium plating regulations (which occur at V) close to the battery_neg< 0) but at a potential just outside it. Since lithium plating behavior is a well-known aging mechanism and potential safety issue, by detecting crystal structure changes, the maximum operating voltage of the battery can be adapted to the battery age to maintain V _neg0 to reduce the deterioration of the battery due to lithium plating.

Detecting crystal structure changes also helps in the adaptation of empirical fast charge algorithms in the absence of an electrochemical model. The adaptation is made on a cycle-by-cycle basis after detection of a crystal structure change on the discharge. This information is used by the BMS to adapt the parameters of the fast charge algorithm in the next charge cycle, resulting in an iterative learning control process. In particular, knowledge of the crystal structure change during discharge can be used to adapt the maximum voltage or cut-off criterion of the battery during fast charge to achieve fast charge while minimizing aging of the battery.

For example, based on the derived and validated relationship between OCP and SOC, lithiation of the battery may be limited to potential values immediately adjacent to, but not beyond, a determined threshold potential at which the electrodes undergo a change in crystal structure. In particular, in one embodiment, the cell is lithiated to a full cell potential that is directly above or directly below (e.g., within 2 mV) a threshold potential at which silicon or silicon-based material has been determined to undergo a crystal structure change. In various embodiments, lithiation during cell operation can be limited to a charging target half-cell potential that is less than or greater than the crystal structure change threshold potential, e.g., at approximately 1mV, approximately 2mV, approximately 5mV, or approximately 10 mV. Advantageously, in such operation, individual cells or cell types can be tested using both detailed electrochemical models and simpler models, and cell operating parameters can be optimized more accurately than in BMS where crystal structure changes are assumed, to avoid or, if desired, ensure that crystal structure changes occur.

In another embodiment, the BMS strategy includes using the verified internal states to control the negative electrode potential to a charging target potential in a region between 70mV and 55 mV. In such embodiments, the BMS strategy is used in combination with a detailed electrochemical model.

In further embodiments, the BMS strategy includes controlling the negative electrode potential to a charging target potential in a region below 55 mV. Controlling the negative electrode potential in the region below 55mV may enable acquisition of additional capacity for the cell that would otherwise not be available if the cell was operated to a conventional 55mV potential level, which is merely an estimate of the potential at which the crystal structure change occurred rather than an accurate determination thereof.

It will be appreciated that variations of the above-described and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems, applications, or methods. Various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the foregoing disclosure.